• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ACO 间在联邦医疗保险储蓄计划中的支出差异。

Spending variation among ACOs in the Medicare Shared Savings Program.

机构信息

Harvard Interfaculty Initiative in Health Policy, 14 Story St, Cambridge, MA 02138. Email:

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2020 Apr;26(4):170-175. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.42834.

DOI:10.37765/ajmc.2020.42834
PMID:32270984
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Understanding variation in spending across organizations, rather than across geographic areas, is important because care is delivered by organizations and interventions increasingly focus on organizations. Accountable care organizations (ACOs) are particularly important to study given their incentives to reduce spending. Analyzing spending differences across ACOs may help identify cost savings opportunities.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis of Medicare claims.

METHODS

We stratified ACOs into quartiles based on the deviation between each ACO's risk-adjusted spending and average risk-adjusted fee-for-service spending in the same market (hospital referral region). We compared spending between top- and bottom-quartile ACOs on each of 7 major service categories and 10 clinical condition groups to identify areas of potential savings. We simulated spending reductions if ACOs with high adjusted spending reduced spending to the levels of lower-spending ACOs.

RESULTS

In 2016, geographically adjusted and risk-adjusted total per-beneficiary spending for the highest-spending quartile of ACOs was 14% higher than for ACOs in the lowest quartile. Variation between high- and low-spending ACOs was greatest, at 27%, in the use of skilled nursing facilities-a service category in which ACOs have reduced spending by the greatest percentage. Inpatient care was the largest driver of absolute dollar differences in spending, however, accounting for 37% of the total spread. If spending in ACOs above median adjusted spending were brought down to the median, savings would be 3% to 4%.

CONCLUSIONS

By extending the variations literature to focus on ACOs, we illustrated that meaningful further savings opportunities exist both within and across markets.

摘要

目的

了解组织之间而非地理区域之间的支出差异很重要,因为医疗服务是由组织提供的,干预措施越来越侧重于组织。鉴于责任医疗组织(ACO)有降低支出的激励措施,因此特别有必要对其进行研究。分析 ACO 之间的支出差异可能有助于发现节省成本的机会。

研究设计

对医疗保险索赔进行的横断面分析。

方法

我们根据每个 ACO 的风险调整后支出与其在同一市场(医院转诊区)内平均风险调整后服务费用之间的偏差,将 ACO 分为四分位数。我们比较了每个主要服务类别和 10 个临床病症组中排名前四分之一和排名后四分之一的 ACO 之间的支出,以确定潜在的节省领域。我们假设高调整支出的 ACO 将支出降低至低支出 ACO 的水平,如果这种假设成立,那么模拟支出减少的情况。

结果

在 2016 年,最高支出四分位的 ACO 的地理调整后和风险调整后每位受益人的总支出比最低四分位的 ACO 高出 14%。高支出和低支出 ACO 之间的差异最大,达到 27%,这是在使用熟练护理设施方面——这是 ACO 降低支出比例最大的服务类别。然而,住院护理是导致支出绝对差异的最大因素,占总差异的 37%。如果将高于中位数调整支出的 ACO 的支出降低至中位数,节省将达到 3%至 4%。

结论

通过将变化文献扩展到关注 ACO,我们表明,在市场内部和市场之间都存在有意义的进一步节省机会。

相似文献

1
Spending variation among ACOs in the Medicare Shared Savings Program.ACO 间在联邦医疗保险储蓄计划中的支出差异。
Am J Manag Care. 2020 Apr;26(4):170-175. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.42834.
2
Avoiding unintended incentives in ACO payment models.避免负责医疗组织(ACO)支付模式中的非预期激励措施。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Jan;34(1):143-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0444.
3
Medicare Spending after 3 Years of the Medicare Shared Savings Program.医疗保险共享储蓄计划实施 3 年后的医疗保险支出。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Sep 20;379(12):1139-1149. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1803388. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
4
Association of Pioneer Accountable Care Organizations vs traditional Medicare fee for service with spending, utilization, and patient experience.先驱责任医疗组织与传统 Medicare 按服务收费制在支出、利用和患者体验方面的关联。
JAMA. 2015 Jun 2;313(21):2152-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.4930.
5
Primary care focus and utilization in the Medicare shared savings program accountable care organizations.医疗保险共享节约计划责任医疗组织中的初级保健重点与利用情况
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb 15;17(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2092-8.
6
Association Between Care Management and Outcomes Among Patients With Complex Needs in Medicare Accountable Care Organizations.医疗保险责任制医疗组织中具有复杂需求的患者的护理管理与结果之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e196939. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6939.
7
Changes in Postacute Care in the Medicare Shared Savings Program.医疗保险共同节约计划中急性后期护理的变化。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Apr 1;177(4):518-526. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9115.
8
Association Between Specialist Office Visits and Health Expenditures in Accountable Care Organizations.在责任医疗组织中,专家门诊就诊与医疗支出的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e196796. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6796.
9
Association Between Medicare Accountable Care Organization Implementation and Spending Among Clinically Vulnerable Beneficiaries.医疗保险责任制医疗组织实施与临床脆弱受益人群支出的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Aug 1;176(8):1167-75. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.2827.
10
Performance in the Medicare Shared Savings Program by Accountable Care Organizations Disproportionately Serving Dual and Disabled Populations.由负责医疗保健的组织提供服务的双重和残疾人群不成比例的医疗保险共享储蓄计划的绩效。
Med Care. 2018 Sep;56(9):805-811. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000968.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of prices in driving the variation in spending across medical groups.价格在驱动医疗组之间支出差异中的作用。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec;58(6):1164-1171. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14207. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
2
Outpatient physical therapy bundled payment models are feasible for total hip arthroplasty patients: an evaluation of utilization, cost and outcomes.门诊物理治疗捆绑支付模式对全髋关节置换术患者是可行的:利用情况、成本和结果评估
Arthroplasty. 2023 May 12;5(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s42836-023-00179-2.
3
Spending outcomes among patients with cancer in accountable care organizations 4 years after implementation.
实施责任医疗组织 4 年后癌症患者的支出结果。
Cancer. 2022 Mar 1;128(5):1093-1100. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34022. Epub 2021 Nov 12.