Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec;58(6):1164-1171. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14207. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
To understand the relative role of prices versus utilization in the variation in total spending per patient across medical groups.
We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of medical claims for commercially insured adults from a large national insurer in 2018.
After assigning patients to a medical group based on primary care visits in 2018, we calculated total medical spending for each patient in that year. Total spending included care provided by clinicians within the medical group and care provided by other providers, including hospitals. It did not include drug spending. We estimated the case mix adjusted spending per patient for each medical group. Within each market, we categorized medical groups into quartiles based on the group's spending per patient. To decompose spending variation into price versus utilization, we compared spending differences between highest and lowest quartile medical groups under two scenarios: (1) using actual prices (2) using a standardized price (same price used for a given service across the nation).
In total, 3,921,736 patients were assigned to 7284 medical groups. Per-patient spending in the highest quartile of spending medical groups was $1813 higher than per-patient spending in the lowest spending quartile of medical groups (50% higher relative spending). This overall difference was primarily driven by differences in inpatient care, imaging, and specialty care. In the scenario where we used standardized prices, the difference in spending between medical groups in the top and bottom quartiles decreased to $1425, implying that 79% of the $1813 difference in spending between the top and bottom quartile groups is explained by utilization and the remaining 21% by prices. The likely explanation for the modest impact of prices is that patients cared for by a given medical group receive care across a wide range of providers.
Prices explained a modest fraction of the differences in spending between medical groups.
了解在医疗组间每位患者总支出的变化中,价格与利用率的相对作用。
我们对一家大型全国保险公司 2018 年商业参保成年人的医疗索赔进行了横断面分析。
根据 2018 年的初级保健就诊情况将患者分配到医疗组后,我们计算了当年每位患者的总医疗支出。总支出包括医疗组内临床医生提供的护理以及其他提供者(包括医院)提供的护理。它不包括药物支出。我们估计了每个医疗组每位患者的病例组合调整后支出。在每个市场中,我们根据每个医疗组的每位患者的支出将医疗组分为四分位数。为了将支出变化分解为价格和利用率,我们在两种情况下比较了支出最高和最低四分位医疗组之间的支出差异:(1)使用实际价格;(2)使用标准化价格(全国范围内用于给定服务的相同价格)。
共有 3921736 名患者被分配到 7284 个医疗组。支出最高四分位医疗组的每位患者的支出比支出最低四分位医疗组的每位患者的支出高出 1813 美元(相对支出高出 50%)。这种总体差异主要是由住院护理、影像和专科护理的差异造成的。在我们使用标准化价格的情况下,顶级和底部四分位医疗组之间的支出差异缩小到 1425 美元,这意味着在顶级和底部四分位组之间的 1813 美元支出差异中,79%是由利用率造成的,剩余的 21%是由价格造成的。价格影响不大的可能原因是,由特定医疗组照顾的患者在广泛的提供者中接受护理。
价格仅解释了医疗组间支出差异的一小部分。