Robson Emma K, Hodder Rebecca K, Kamper Steven J, O'Brien Kate M, Williams Amanda, Lee Hopin, Wolfenden Luke, Yoong Serene, Wiggers John, Barnett Chris, Williams Christopher M
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020 Jun;50(6):319-333. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2020.9041. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
To assess the effectiveness of weight-loss interventions on pain and disability in people with knee and hip osteoarthritis (OA) and spinal pain.
Intervention systematic review.
Twelve online databases and clinical trial registries.
Randomized controlled trials of any weight-loss intervention (eg, diet, physical activity, surgical, pharmaceutical) that reported pain or disability outcomes in people with knee or hip OA or spinal pain.
We calculated mean differences or standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool to assess risk of bias and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool to judge credibility of evidence.
Twenty-two trials with 3602 participants were included. There was very low- to very low-credibility evidence for a moderate effect of weight-loss interventions on pain intensity (10 trials, n = 1806; SMD, -0.54; 95% CI: -0.86, -0.22; I = 87%, <.001) and a small effect on disability (11 trials, n = 1821; SMD, -0.32; 95% CI: -0.49, -0.14; I = 58%, <.001) compared to minimal care for people with OA. For knee OA, there was low- to moderate-credibility evidence that weight-loss interventions were not more effective than exercise only for pain intensity and disability, respectively (4 trials, n = 673; SMD, -0.13; 95% CI: -0.40, 0.14; I = 55%; 5 trials, n = 737; SMD, -0.20; 95% CI: -0.41, 0.00; I = 32%).
Weight-loss interventions may provide small to moderate improvements in pain and disability for OA compared to minimal care. There was limited and inconclusive evidence for weight-loss interventions targeting spinal pain. .
评估减肥干预措施对膝关节和髋关节骨关节炎(OA)患者以及脊柱疼痛患者的疼痛和功能障碍的效果。
干预性系统评价。
十二个在线数据库和临床试验注册库。
任何减肥干预措施(如饮食、体育活动、手术、药物治疗)的随机对照试验,这些试验报告了膝关节或髋关节OA患者或脊柱疼痛患者的疼痛或功能障碍结果。
我们计算了平均差或标准化平均差(SMD)以及95%置信区间(CI)。我们使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险,并使用推荐分级评估、制定和评价工具判断证据的可信度。
纳入了22项试验,共3602名参与者。与OA患者的最低限度护理相比,减肥干预措施对疼痛强度有中度影响(10项试验,n = 1806;SMD,-0.54;95%CI:-0.86,-0.22;I² = 87%,P <.001),证据可信度极低至非常低,对功能障碍有轻微影响(11项试验,n = 1821;SMD,-0.32;95%CI:-0.49,-0.14;I² = 58%,P <.001)。对于膝关节OA,有低至中度可信度的证据表明,减肥干预措施在疼痛强度和功能障碍方面并不比单纯运动更有效(4项试验,n = 673;SMD,-0.13;95%CI:-0.40,0.14;I² = 55%;5项试验,n = 737;SMD,-0.20;95%CI:-0.41,0.00;I² = 32%)。
与最低限度护理相比,减肥干预措施可能会使OA患者的疼痛和功能障碍有轻微到中度的改善。针对脊柱疼痛的减肥干预措施的证据有限且尚无定论。