Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland, Oregon.
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Jul 15;26(14):3578-3588. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-3978. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
Two studies in previously treated metastatic pancreatic cancer have been completed combining GVAX pancreas vaccine (GM-CSF-secreting allogeneic pancreatic tumor cells) with cyclophosphamide (Cy) and CRS-207 (live, attenuated -expressing mesothelin). In the current study, we compared Cy/GVAX followed by CRS-207 with (Arm A) or without nivolumab (Arm B).
Patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who received one prior therapy for metastatic disease and RECIST measurable disease were randomized 1:1 to receive treatment on Arm A or Arm B. The primary objective was to compare overall survival (OS) between the arms. Additional objectives included assessment of progression-free survival, safety, tumor responses, CA19-9 responses, and immunologic correlates.
Ninety-three patients were treated (Arm A, 51; Arm B, 42). The median OS in Arms A and B were 5.9 [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.7-8.6] and 6.1 (95% CI, 3.5-7.0) months, respectively, with an HR of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.55-1.34). Objective responses were seen in 3 patients using immune-related response criteria (4%, 2/51, Arm A; 2%, 1/42, Arm B). The grade ≥3 related adverse event rate, whereas higher in Arm A (35.3% vs. 11.9%) was manageable. Changes in the microenvironment, including increase in CD8 T cells and a decrease in CD68 myeloid cells, were observed in long-term survivors in Arm A only.
Although the study did not meet its primary endpoint of improvement in OS of Arm A over Arm B, the OS was comparable with standard therapy. Objective responses and immunologic changes in the tumor microenvironment were evident.
两项已完成的转移性胰腺癌的既往治疗研究将 GVAX 胰腺疫苗(分泌 GM-CSF 的同种异体胰腺肿瘤细胞)与环磷酰胺(Cy)和 CRS-207(活减毒表达间皮素)联合使用。在目前的研究中,我们比较了 Cy/GVAX 序贯 CRS-207 联合(A 组)或不联合纳武利尤单抗(B 组)的疗效。
接受过一种转移性疾病标准治疗且 RECIST 可测量疾病的胰腺腺癌患者按 1:1 随机分为 A 组或 B 组。主要终点是比较两组的总生存期(OS)。次要终点包括无进展生存期、安全性、肿瘤反应、CA19-9 反应和免疫相关性评估。
共 93 例患者接受治疗(A 组 51 例,B 组 42 例)。A 组和 B 组的中位 OS 分别为 5.9 [95%置信区间(CI),4.7-8.6]和 6.1 个月(95%CI,3.5-7.0),HR 为 0.86(95%CI,0.55-1.34)。根据免疫相关反应标准,A 组和 B 组分别有 3 例患者(4%,2/51;2%,1/42)出现客观缓解。A 组(35.3%)与 B 组(11.9%)相比,≥3 级相关不良事件发生率更高,但可管理。仅在 A 组的长期生存者中观察到微环境的变化,包括 CD8 T 细胞增加和 CD68 髓样细胞减少。
尽管该研究没有达到 A 组 OS 优于 B 组的主要终点,但 OS 与标准治疗相当。客观缓解和肿瘤微环境中的免疫变化是明显的。