Moghaddas Mohammad Javad, Moosavi Horieh, Yaghoubirad Sara, Chiniforush Nasim
Dental Material Research Center, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of density, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
J Lasers Med Sci. 2020 Spring;11(2):160-166. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2020.27. Epub 2020 Mar 15.
The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of the bioactive glass, the glass ionomer, and the Erbium YAG laser as liners on the remineralization of the affected dentin. The present study was conducted on 64 healthy extracted human molars divided into 4 groups, 1 control group and 3 experimental groups. After artificially inducing dentinal caries lesions, each of the experimental groups was applied to the cavity floor and then restored with a composite. The samples were stored after thermocycling in an incubator for two months. Finally, the hardness of the cavity floor was measured at 3 depths of 20, 50 and 100 μm by the Vickers microhardness tester. The dentin conditions underneath the liners were also evaluated with FESEM. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA and the post-hoc Games-Howell test (<0.05). Among the groups, the lowest microhardness value was in the control group (<0.05) except at a depth of 100 μm; therefore, there was no significant difference between the control group and the bioactive glass (>0.05). The laser group had the highest microhardness value, which was significantly different from the control group (<0.05). There was a significant difference between the laser and bioactive glass (<0.05), except at a depth of 20 μm. The laser and glass ionomer had only a significant difference at a depth of 100 μm (<0.05). The microhardness value induced by glass ionomer was higher than bioactive glass, which in no depth was significant (>0.05). Partial dentinal tubule occlusion was observed with FESEM in each of the experimental groups as compared to the control group. The microhardness values were higher in all groups than in the control group. The laser might be more successful in remineralization than the other ones.
本研究的目的是比较生物活性玻璃、玻璃离子体和铒钇铝石榴石激光作为衬层对患龋牙本质再矿化的影响。本研究选取64颗健康拔除的人类磨牙,分为4组,1个对照组和3个实验组。人工诱导牙本质龋损后,将每个实验组应用于洞底,然后用复合树脂修复。热循环后,将样本置于培养箱中储存两个月。最后,用维氏显微硬度计在20、50和100μm的3个深度测量洞底的硬度。还用场发射扫描电子显微镜评估了衬层下方的牙本质状况。采用双向方差分析和事后Games-Howell检验进行统计分析(<0.05)。在各组中,除100μm深度外,对照组的显微硬度值最低(<0.05);因此,对照组与生物活性玻璃之间无显著差异(>0.05)。激光组的显微硬度值最高,与对照组有显著差异(<0.05)。除20μm深度外,激光组与生物活性玻璃组之间有显著差异(<0.05)。激光组与玻璃离子体组仅在100μm深度有显著差异(<0.05)。玻璃离子体诱导的显微硬度值高于生物活性玻璃,在任何深度均无显著差异(>0.05)。与对照组相比,在每个实验组中用场发射扫描电子显微镜观察到部分牙本质小管堵塞。所有组的显微硬度值均高于对照组。激光在再矿化方面可能比其他方法更成功。