Besegato João Felipe, Melo Priscila Borges Gobbo de, Abreu Bernardi Adilson César, Souza Marina Trevelin, Zanotto Edgar Dutra, Bagnato Vanderlei Salvador, de Souza Rastelli Alessandra Nara
Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Araraquara, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Araraquara 14801-903, SP, Brazil.
Department of Biology and Health Sciences, University of Araraquara-UNIARA, Araraquara 14801-340, SP, Brazil.
Pathogens. 2023 Aug 17;12(8):1052. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12081052.
Novel approaches for caries lesion removal and treatment have been proposed. This study evaluates the combined use of an experimental ultrasound, aPDT (antimicrobial photodynamic therapy) and bioactive glasses on the removal, decontamination and remineralization of dentin caries lesions. A biological model created with a duo species biofilm ( and ) was used for the development of a caries-like lesion over the dentin for 7 days. Bovine dentin specimens (4 × 4 × 2 mm) were randomized according to the following caries removal techniques: bur (BUR) or ultrasound (ULT), decontamination (with or without aPDT) and remineralization materials (45S5 or F18 bioactive glasses). The following different groups were investigated: caries lesion (control); sound dentin (control); BUR; BUR + aPDT; ULT; ULT + aPDT; BUR + 45S5, BUR + F18; ULT + 45S5; ULT + F18; BUR + aPDT + 45S5; BUR + aPDT + F18; ULT + aPDT + 45S5; and ULT + aPDT + F18. Transverse microradiography (TMR), cross-sectional microhardness (CSH), FT-Raman spectroscopy and confocal microscopy (CLSM) were performed. A two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test were used (α = 0.05). (3) Results: The TMR revealed a lesion depth of 213.9 ± 49.5 μm and a mineral loss of 4929.3% vol.μm. The CSH increases as a function of depth, regardless of the group ( < 0.05). Removal with BUR (24.40-63.03 KHN) has a greater CSH than ULT (20.01-47.53 KHN; < 0.05). aPDT did not affect the CSH ( > 0.05). No difference was observed between 45S5 or F18 ( > 0.05), but a change was observed for ULT ( > 0.05). The FT-Raman shows no differences for the phosphate ( > 0.05), but a difference is observed for the carbonate and C-H bonds. The CLSM images show that aPDT effectively inactivates residual bacteria. A combination of ULT, aPDT and bioactive glasses can be a promising minimally invasive treatment.
已经提出了用于龋损去除和治疗的新方法。本研究评估了实验性超声、抗菌光动力疗法(aPDT)和生物活性玻璃联合使用对牙本质龋损的去除、去污和再矿化的效果。使用由双菌种生物膜( 和 )创建的生物学模型在牙本质上形成类似龋损的病变,持续7天。将牛牙本质标本(4×4×2毫米)根据以下龋损去除技术进行随机分组:牙钻(BUR)或超声(ULT)、去污(有或无aPDT)和再矿化材料(45S5或F18生物活性玻璃)。研究了以下不同组:龋损病变(对照组);健康牙本质(对照组);BUR;BUR + aPDT;ULT;ULT + aPDT;BUR + 45S5;BUR + F18;ULT + 45S5;ULT + F18;BUR + aPDT + 45S5;BUR + aPDT + F18;ULT + aPDT + 45S5;ULT + aPDT + F18。进行了横向显微放射照相(TMR)、横截面显微硬度(CSH)、傅里叶变换拉曼光谱和共聚焦显微镜(CLSM)检查。使用双向方差分析和Tukey检验(α = 0.05)。(3)结果:TMR显示病变深度为213.9±49.5μm,矿物质损失为4929.3%体积·μm。无论组别如何,CSH均随深度增加(<0.05)。使用BUR去除(24.40 - 63.03 KHN)后的CSH高于ULT(20.01 - 47.53 KHN;<0.05)。aPDT不影响CSH(>0.05)。45S5和F18之间未观察到差异(>0.05),但ULT组有变化(>0.05)。傅里叶变换拉曼光谱显示磷酸盐无差异(>0.05),但碳酸盐和C - H键有差异。CLSM图像显示aPDT有效灭活残留细菌。ULT、aPDT和生物活性玻璃的联合使用可能是一种有前景的微创治疗方法。