Department of Operative and Preventive Dentistry, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Aßmannshauser Str. 4-6, 14197 Berlin, Germany.
Department of Operative and Preventive Dentistry, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Aßmannshauser Str. 4-6, 14197 Berlin, Germany.
Dent Mater. 2019 May;35(5):772-779. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.02.021. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the remineralization effects of conventional and experimental ion-releasing materials on different artificial dentin carious lesions.
Forty human dentin discs were submitted to different demineralization protocols for simulated caries lesion: (D1) Shallow chemically-induced caries, (D2) deep chemically-induced caries, (D3) deep bacterially-induced caries. Each disc was divided in five parts; one of those served as baseline control. The remaining parts of each disc (n=12-16/group) were treated using the following materials: EXP, an experimental resin-based bioactive material consisting of a self-etch primer and an adhesive containing a fluoride-doped bioglass; GIC, a glass ionomer cement (Riva LC); MTA, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (ProRoot MTA); BIO, a calcium silicate cement (Biodentine). Specimens were mounted in a dual-chamber device to simulate the exposure to pulpal pressure and oral fluids. After 3 months, mineral and mechanical gains were assessed using transverse microradiography (vol% × μm) and microhardness measurements (VHN). Characterization using confocal microscopy and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was also performed.
All four restorative materials induced mineral gains regardless of the protocol for caries lesion, without significant differences between materials. Microhardness significantly increased in the groups BIO and MTA, but not GIC; EXP only provided hardness gains in D3-lesions. Fluorescence and confocal microscopy confirmed these results. There was a clear "top-down" remineralization in the groups BIO and MTA, and "bottom-up" intrafibrillar collagen remineralization in EXP.
Mineral gains did not always translate into hardness gains. Biodentine and MTA induced evident mineral precipitation, but intra/inter-fibrillar collagen mineral infiltration was only provided by biomimetic remineralisation via the use of the experimental adhesive. Complete remineralization of caries lesions remains a challenge.
本研究旨在评估传统和实验性离子释放材料对不同人工牙本质龋损的再矿化效果。
将 40 个人牙本质圆盘分为五部分,每部分进行不同的脱矿处理以模拟龋损:(D1)浅层化学诱导龋损,(D2)深层化学诱导龋损,(D3)深层细菌诱导龋损。其中一部分作为对照。其余部分(n=12-16/组)使用以下材料进行处理:EXP,一种实验性树脂基生物活性材料,由自酸蚀底漆和含有氟掺杂生物玻璃的胶粘剂组成;GIC,玻璃离子水门汀(Riva LC);MTA,矿化三氧化物聚合体(ProRoot MTA);BIO,硅酸钙水泥(Biodentine)。将标本装入双室装置中,以模拟牙髓压力和口腔液体的暴露。3 个月后,使用横向显微放射摄影术(体积%×μm)和显微硬度测量(VHN)评估矿物质和机械增益。还进行了共聚焦显微镜和透射电子显微镜(TEM)的特性分析。
所有四种修复材料均诱导了矿物质的增加,无论龋损的处理方案如何,材料之间没有显著差异。BIO 和 MTA 组的显微硬度显著增加,但 GIC 组没有;EXP 仅在 D3 病变中提供硬度增加。荧光和共聚焦显微镜证实了这些结果。BIO 和 MTA 组有明显的“自上而下”的再矿化,EXP 组有“自下而上”的纤维内胶原再矿化。
矿物质的增加并不总是转化为硬度的增加。Biodentine 和 MTA 诱导了明显的矿物质沉淀,但仅通过使用实验性胶粘剂进行仿生再矿化,才能提供纤维内/间胶原的矿物质渗透。龋病的完全再矿化仍然是一个挑战。