Suppr超能文献

负压封闭引流术。双侧胸大肌肌瓣用于治疗深部胸骨伤口感染。

Vacuum-assisted closure . bilateral pectoralis major muscle flaps for deep sternal wounds infection.

作者信息

Pan Tuo, Li Kai, Fan Fu-Dong, Gao Yong-Shun, Wang Dong-Jin

机构信息

Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Seventh Medical Center of People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100010, China.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2020 Mar;12(3):866-875. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.76.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) is a life-threatening complication after cardiac surgery. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the outcomes of reconstructing infected poststernotomy wounds with either vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) after previous debridement or bilateral pectoralis major muscle flaps (BPMMFs).

METHODS

In total, 565 patients with postoperative DSWI were enrolled in this study from January 1, 2014, to June 1, 2018. Of these patients, 247 received BPMMFs. To address the indicated biases, a 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort was created based on age, body mass index, preoperative diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), internal thoracic artery grafting (ITAG), type of cardiac surgery, time before treatment for DSWI and wound classification. After matching, 132 patients who had similar risk profiles were enrolled in the study population (66 in the VAC group: 66 in the BPMMF group).

RESULTS

At 21.9±12.1 (median: 24, IQR: 14-28) months of follow-up, the survival rate was 93.9% in the BPMMF group and 74.4% in the VAC group (P<0.01). Compared with the VAC group, the BPMMF group had a significantly decreased length of hospital stay (P<0.01). At the spirometry assessment, the forced expiratory volume in the 1st second (FEV1), vital capacity (VC), and FEV1/VC ratio showed no significant differences in survival between the VAC group and BPMMF group.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, compared with VAC therapy, BPMMFs guaranteed better early- and late-term outcomes, as shown by less length of hospital stay, a higher rate of long-term survival and unimpaired respiratory function.

摘要

背景

深部胸骨伤口感染(DSWI)是心脏手术后一种危及生命的并发症。本研究的目的是回顾性评估在先前清创后使用负压封闭引流(VAC)或双侧胸大肌肌瓣(BPMMF)重建胸骨切开术后感染伤口的效果。

方法

2014年1月1日至2018年6月1日,共有565例术后发生DSWI的患者纳入本研究。其中,247例接受了BPMMF治疗。为解决所指出的偏差,根据年龄、体重指数、术前糖尿病、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)、胸廓内动脉移植(ITAG)、心脏手术类型、DSWI治疗前时间和伤口分类,创建了一个1:1倾向评分匹配队列。匹配后,132例具有相似风险特征的患者被纳入研究人群(VAC组66例:BPMMF组66例)。

结果

在21.9±12.1(中位数:24,四分位数间距:14 - 28)个月的随访中,BPMMF组的生存率为93.9%,VAC组为74.4%(P<0.01)。与VAC组相比,BPMMF组的住院时间显著缩短(P<0.01)。在肺功能测定评估中,第1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)、肺活量(VC)和FEV1/VC比值在VAC组和BPMMF组的生存率方面无显著差异。

结论

在我们的研究中,与VAC治疗相比,BPMMF保证了更好的早期和晚期效果,表现为住院时间更短、长期生存率更高且呼吸功能未受损。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cdc/7139061/5f05cce88427/jtd-12-03-866-f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验