Suppr超能文献

GM-CSF 不能挽救劣质胚胎:一项随机对照试验的二次分析。

GM-CSF does not rescue poor-quality embryos: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Division of Gynecology and Reproduction, Department of Reproductive Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 May;301(5):1341-1346. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05532-3. Epub 2020 Apr 9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate implantation potential of cleavage-stage embryos cultured in medium containing 2 ng/ml granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) versus control medium, according to embryo morphological quality and then transferred on day 3.

METHODS

Explorative secondary data analysis of a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded prospective study of 1149 couples with embryo transfer after IVF/ICSI. This analysis includes a subgroup of 422 subjects with either single-embryo transfer (SET, N = 286) or double-embryo transfer of two embryos with equivalent morphological quality (DET, N = 136). Implantation rate and live birth rate were assessed according to category of morphological embryo quality on day 3.

RESULTS

Culture with GM-CSF did not increase the implantation rate for embryos classified as poor quality. A trend towards greater benefit of GM-CSF on implantation and survival until live birth for top-quality embryos (TQEs) compared with poor-quality embryos was observed, although not statistically significant. For TQEs, the percentage of transferred embryos resulting in a live born baby was: 40.9 ± 5.3% (GM-CSF) versus 30.5 ± 4.6% (control) (P = 0.24; odds ratio [OR] 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-2.59), and for embryos with less than 6 cells at day 3 this same rate was: 7.4 ± 3.3% (GM-CSF) versus 12.0 ± 4.0% (control) (P = 0.26; OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.17-1.61).

CONCLUSION

This exploratory analysis is consistent with GM-CSF protecting morphologically normal embryos from culture-induced stress and does not support an effect of GM-CSF in rescuing poor-quality embryos. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00565747.

摘要

目的

评估胚胎在含有 2ng/ml 粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)的培养基中与对照培养基中的分裂期胚胎的植入潜力,根据胚胎形态质量,然后在第 3 天进行转移。

方法

对 1149 对接受 IVF/ICSI 后胚胎移植的夫妇进行的多中心、随机、安慰剂对照、双盲前瞻性研究的二次数据分析。该分析包括具有单个胚胎转移(SET,N=286)或具有相同形态质量的两个胚胎的双胚胎转移(DET,N=136)的 422 名受试者的亚组。根据第 3 天胚胎形态质量类别评估植入率和活产率。

结果

GM-CSF 培养并未增加形态学质量差的胚胎的着床率。尽管没有统计学意义,但观察到 GM-CSF 对优质胚胎(TQE)的着床和存活至活产的益处趋势大于对劣质胚胎的益处。对于 TQE,导致活产婴儿的转移胚胎百分比为:40.9±5.3%(GM-CSF)与 30.5±4.6%(对照)(P=0.24;优势比[OR]1.43,95%置信区间[CI]0.79-2.59),对于第 3 天少于 6 个细胞的胚胎,相同的比率为:7.4±3.3%(GM-CSF)与 12.0±4.0%(对照)(P=0.26;OR 0.53,95%CI 0.17-1.61)。

结论

这项探索性分析与 GM-CSF 保护形态正常的胚胎免受培养诱导的应激一致,并且不支持 GM-CSF 对挽救劣质胚胎的作用。临床试验.gov 标识符:NCT00565747。

相似文献

1
GM-CSF does not rescue poor-quality embryos: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 May;301(5):1341-1346. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05532-3. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
4
The BlastGen study: a randomized controlled trial of blastocyst media supplemented with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2020 May;40(5):645-652. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.01.011. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
7
Guidelines for the number of embryos to transfer following in vitro fertilization No. 182, September 2006.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008 Aug;102(2):203-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.01.007.
9
Comparison of the Effects of GMCSF-Containing and Traditional Culture Media on Embryo Development and Pregnancy Success Rates.
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2022 Nov;44(11):1047-1051. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1759630. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
10
Influence of embryo culture medium (G5 and HTF) on pregnancy and perinatal outcome after IVF: a multicenter RCT.
Hum Reprod. 2016 Oct;31(10):2219-30. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew156. Epub 2016 Aug 23.

本文引用的文献

2
Piglets produced from cloned blastocysts cultured in vitro with GM-CSF.
Mol Reprod Dev. 2013 Feb;80(2):145-54. doi: 10.1002/mrd.22143. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
3
Porcine granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor improves the in vitro development of cloned porcine embryos.
J Vet Med Sci. 2012 Sep;74(9):1095-102. doi: 10.1292/jvms.12-0050. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
4
When and how should new technology be introduced into the IVF laboratory?
Hum Reprod. 2012 Feb;27(2):303-13. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der414. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
5
Effects of porcine granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor on porcine in vitro-fertilized embryos.
Theriogenology. 2012 Apr 1;77(6):1186-97. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.10.025. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
6
Peri-conceptual cytokines--setting the trajectory for embryo implantation, pregnancy and beyond.
Am J Reprod Immunol. 2011 Jul;66 Suppl 1:2-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2011.01039.x.
7
Culture of human oocytes with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor has no effect on embryonic chromosomal constitution.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Apr;20(4):477-84. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.12.026. Epub 2009 Dec 28.
8
Effect of the association of IGF-I, IGF-II, bFGF, TGF-beta1, GM-CSF, and LIF on the development of bovine embryos produced in vitro.
Theriogenology. 2010 Mar 15;73(5):595-604. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.10.015. Epub 2009 Dec 24.
9
Colony-stimulating factor 2 (CSF-2) improves development and posttransfer survival of bovine embryos produced in vitro.
Endocrinology. 2009 Nov;150(11):5046-54. doi: 10.1210/en.2009-0481. Epub 2009 Sep 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验