• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一个患有经典型半乳糖血症的婴儿险些被漏诊:检测成功但系统却掉了链子。

How a baby with classic galactosemia was nearly missed: When the test succeeds but system fails.

机构信息

Rare Disease Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.

Department of Pediatrics, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

出版信息

Am J Med Genet A. 2020 Jul;182(7):1750-1753. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.61587. Epub 2020 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1002/ajmg.a.61587
PMID:32275121
Abstract

Newborn screening (NBS) is a well-established state-run public health program which has targeted the early identification of treatable diseases like classic galactosemia (CG) for over a decade. We describe the case of a symptomatic newborn with CG and an abnormal screen report, including positive DNA-based test, who still managed to fall through the cracks in a sub-optimally functioning NBS program, despite decades of screening experience. While much attention is paid to testing technology, this case illustrates basic minimum requirements a newborn screening program must fulfill to reliably identify and treat all affected individuals including minimum reporting requirements, case surveillance and a dedicated short-term follow-up program. In newborn screening, success is systematic.

摘要

新生儿筛查(NBS)是一项成熟的国家公共卫生计划,十多年来一直致力于早期发现可治疗的疾病,如经典半乳糖血症(CG)。我们描述了一个有症状的 CG 新生儿的病例,其筛查报告异常,包括基于 DNA 的阳性检测,但仍未能通过一个功能不佳的 NBS 计划的漏洞,尽管有几十年的筛查经验。虽然人们对检测技术给予了很多关注,但这个病例说明了新生儿筛查计划必须满足的基本最低要求,以可靠地识别和治疗所有受影响的个体,包括最低报告要求、病例监测和专门的短期随访计划。在新生儿筛查中,成功是系统性的。

相似文献

1
How a baby with classic galactosemia was nearly missed: When the test succeeds but system fails.一个患有经典型半乳糖血症的婴儿险些被漏诊:检测成功但系统却掉了链子。
Am J Med Genet A. 2020 Jul;182(7):1750-1753. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.61587. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
2
Nine years of newborn screening for classical galactosemia in the Netherlands: Effectiveness of screening methods, and identification of patients with previously unreported phenotypes.荷兰九年经典型半乳糖血症新生儿筛查:筛查方法的有效性及此前未报告表型患者的识别
Mol Genet Metab. 2017 Mar;120(3):223-228. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2016.12.012. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
3
Galactosemia: when is it a newborn screening emergency?半乳糖血症:何时属于新生儿筛查急症?
Mol Genet Metab. 2012 May;106(1):7-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2012.03.007. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
4
Newborn screening for galactosemia: a 30-year single center experience.新生儿半乳糖血症筛查:30年单中心经验
World J Pediatr. 2015 May;11(2):160-4. doi: 10.1007/s12519-015-0017-3. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
5
Selective screening for neonatal galactosemia: an alternative approach.新生儿半乳糖血症的选择性筛查:一种替代方法。
Acta Paediatr. 2001 Aug;90(8):948-9.
6
Screening for galactosemia: Philippines experience. Newborn Screening Study Group.半乳糖血症筛查:菲律宾的经验。新生儿筛查研究小组。
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1999;30 Suppl 2:66-8.
7
Newborn screening for galactosemia: a new method used in Manitoba.新生儿半乳糖血症筛查:曼尼托巴省采用的一种新方法。
Pediatrics. 1989 Aug;84(2):331-5.
8
Cost-benefit analysis of newborn screening for galactosemia in the Philippines.菲律宾半乳糖血症新生儿筛查的成本效益分析。
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2003;34 Suppl 3:215-20.
9
Newborn screening for galactosemia: a review of 5 years of data and audit of a revised reporting approach.新生儿半乳糖血症筛查:5 年数据回顾及改良报告方式审核
Clin Chem. 2010 Mar;56(3):437-44. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2009.135947. Epub 2010 Jan 14.
10
Newborn mass screening for galactosemia.新生儿半乳糖血症群体筛查
Eur J Pediatr. 1995;154(7 Suppl 2):S37-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02143801.

引用本文的文献

1
Is Our Newborn Screening Working Well? A Literature Review of Quality Requirements for Newborn Blood Spot Screening (NBS) Infrastructure and Procedures.我们的新生儿筛查工作进展顺利吗?新生儿血斑筛查(NBS)基础设施与程序质量要求的文献综述。
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2023 Jun 22;9(3):35. doi: 10.3390/ijns9030035.