Suppr超能文献

估算脉搏波速度是否能提供预后信息?MORGAM 前瞻性队列研究项目。

Does Estimated Pulse Wave Velocity Add Prognostic Information?: MORGAM Prospective Cohort Project.

机构信息

From the Center for Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, The Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark (J.K.K.V.-N., A.L.).

Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet (J.K.K.V.-N.), University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Hypertension. 2020 Jun;75(6):1420-1428. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14088. Epub 2020 Apr 10.

Abstract

The Reference Values for Arterial Stiffness Collaboration has derived an equation using age and mean blood pressure to estimated pulse wave velocity (ePWV), which predicted cardiovascular events independently of Systematic COoronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) and Framingham Risk Score. The study aim was to investigate the independent association between ePWV and clinical outcomes in 107 599 apparently healthy subjects (53% men) aged 19 to 97 years from the MORGAM Project who were included between 1982 and 2002 in 38 cohorts from 11 countries. Using multiple Cox-regression analyses, the predictive value of ePWV was calculated adjusting for country of inclusion and either SCORE, Framingham Risk Score, or traditional cardiovascular risk factors (age, sex, smoking, systolic blood pressure, body mass index [BMI], total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol). Cardiovascular mortality consisted of fatal stroke, fatal myocardial infarction, or coronary death, and the composite cardiovascular end point consisted of stroke, myocardial infarction, or coronary death. Model discrimination was assessed using Harrell's -statistic. Adjusting for country and logSCORE or Framingham Risk Score, ePWV was associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.23 [95% CI 1.20-1.25] per m/s or 1.32 [1.29-1.34]), cardiovascular mortality (1.26 [1.21-1.32] or 1.35 [1.31-1.40]), and composite cardiovascular end point (1.19 [1.16-1.22] or 1.23 [1.20-1.25]; all <0.001). However, after adjusting for traditional cardiovascular risk factors, ePWV was only associated with all-cause mortality (1.15 [1.08-1.22], <0.001) and not with cardiovascular mortality (0.97 [0.91-1.03]) nor composite cardiovascular end point (1.10 [0.97-1.26]). The areas under the last 3 receiver operator characteristic curves remained unchanged when adding ePWV. Elevated ePWV was associated with subsequent mortality and cardiovascular morbidity independently of systematic coronary risk evaluation and Framingham Risk Score but not independently of traditional cardiovascular risk factors.

摘要

动脉僵硬度参考值协作组利用年龄和平均血压推导出了一个估算脉搏波速度(ePWV)的方程,该方程可独立于系统性冠状动脉风险评估(SCORE)和弗雷明汉风险评分预测心血管事件。该研究的目的是在 1982 年至 2002 年间,从来自 11 个国家的 38 个队列的 107599 名年龄在 19 岁至 97 岁的看似健康的受试者(53%为男性)中,调查 ePWV 与临床结局之间的独立相关性。使用多 Cox 回归分析,通过调整纳入国家以及 SCORE、弗雷明汉风险评分或传统心血管危险因素(年龄、性别、吸烟、收缩压、体重指数[BMI]、总胆固醇和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇),计算 ePWV 的预测价值。心血管死亡率包括致命性中风、致命性心肌梗死或冠状动脉死亡,复合心血管终点包括中风、心肌梗死或冠状动脉死亡。使用 Harrell's -统计量评估模型区分度。在调整国家和 logSCORE 或弗雷明汉风险评分后,ePWV 与全因死亡率(危险比,每 m/s 增加 1.23[95%CI 1.20-1.25]或每增加 1.32[1.29-1.34])、心血管死亡率(1.26[1.21-1.32]或 1.35[1.31-1.40])和复合心血管终点(1.19[1.16-1.22]或 1.23[1.20-1.25])相关(均<0.001)。然而,在调整传统心血管危险因素后,ePWV 仅与全因死亡率(1.15[1.08-1.22],<0.001)相关,而与心血管死亡率(0.97[0.91-1.03])或复合心血管终点(1.10[0.97-1.26])无关。添加 ePWV 后,最后 3 个接收器工作特征曲线的面积保持不变。ePWV 升高与随后的死亡率和心血管发病率独立于系统性冠状动脉风险评估和弗雷明汉风险评分相关,但与传统心血管危险因素无关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验