University of Parma.
University di Parma.
Acta Biomed. 2020 Apr 10;91(3-S):165-167. doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i3-S.9440.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between the microbial air contamination values obtained by active sampling (colony-forming units per cubic metre, CFU/m3) and by passive sampling (Index of microbial air contamination, IMA) and to calculate the corresponding equations. Air sampling was performed in ten dental clinics (DC), before (T0), during (T1) and after (T2) the clinical activity, for five consecutive days, once a month for a period of three months, for a total of 450 air samplings. The correlation was evaluated using the Spearman test, and a p value below 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A statistically significant correlation was found considering both the results obtained from the total observations and from the single sampling times, T0, T1 and T2. Different correlation patterns were observed stratifying by DC. Both methods were able to evaluate the microbial air quality and highlight critical situations; therefore, both can be used with this aim. However, in particular during the activity, passive sampling resulted more sensitive, and for its simplicity, economy and standardization by IMA, as suggested by several authors, can be suggested for routine monitoring.
本研究旨在评估主动采样(每立方米菌落形成单位,CFU/m3)和被动采样(空气微生物污染指数,IMA)获得的空气微生物污染值之间的相关性,并计算相应的方程。在临床活动前(T0)、期间(T1)和之后(T2),对十个牙科诊所(DC)进行了空气采样,连续五天,每月一次,共进行了 450 次空气采样,持续三个月。使用 Spearman 检验评估相关性,p 值低于 0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。考虑到总观察结果和单个采样时间 T0、T1 和 T2,都发现了具有统计学意义的相关性。通过对 DC 进行分层,观察到不同的相关性模式。两种方法都能够评估空气微生物质量并突出关键情况;因此,都可以用于此目的。然而,特别是在活动期间,被动采样的灵敏度更高,并且正如几位作者所建议的那样,IMA 具有简单、经济和标准化的特点,可以建议将其用于常规监测。