• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰营利性养老院:哪些因素导致了它们的兴起?

For-Profit Nursing Homes in the Netherlands: What Factors Explain Their Rise?

机构信息

Utrecht University School of Governance, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands *Both the authors share first authorship of this article.

出版信息

Int J Health Serv. 2020 Oct;50(4):431-443. doi: 10.1177/0020731420915658. Epub 2020 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1177/0020731420915658
PMID:32276563
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7441333/
Abstract

This exploratory, mixed-methods study analyzes characteristics of the emerging for-profit nursing home industry in the Netherlands and identifies the interrelated set of factors (context, trends, and sector conditions) that contribute to its growth. Until recently, the Dutch nursing home sector relied almost exclusively on nonprofit providers. Even though profit distribution in nursing home care is still banned, the for-profit nursing home sector is expanding. The study uses economic theory on nonprofit organizations and mixed-form markets to understand this expansion. We find that changes in the regulatory framework have unlocked the potential of the for-profit nursing home sector, enabling for-profit nursing homes to circumvent the for-profit ban. The expansion of the for-profit sector was mainly driven by the low responsiveness of the nonprofit sector to increased and changed demands. For-profit providers took advantage of this void. Moreover, they exploited "cream-skimming" potential in the market and used the wider care system to reduce their labor costs by relying on external specialist care. Another main driver was the access to financial capital from private investors (e.g., private equity firms).

摘要

本探索性、混合方法研究分析了荷兰新兴营利性养老院行业的特征,并确定了促成其增长的一系列相互关联的因素(背景、趋势和行业条件)。直到最近,荷兰养老院行业几乎完全依赖非营利性提供商。尽管在养老院护理中仍然禁止利润分配,但营利性养老院行业正在扩张。该研究利用非营利组织和混合形式市场的经济理论来理解这种扩张。我们发现,监管框架的变化释放了营利性养老院行业的潜力,使营利性养老院能够规避营利性禁令。营利性部门的扩张主要是由于非营利部门对增加和变化的需求反应迟钝。营利性供应商利用了这一空白。此外,他们利用了市场的“择优筛选”潜力,并利用更广泛的护理系统,通过依赖外部专业护理来降低劳动力成本。另一个主要驱动因素是私人投资者(如私募股权公司)获得金融资本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f77/7441333/eb9aabccadcc/10.1177_0020731420915658-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f77/7441333/960c14adf47c/10.1177_0020731420915658-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f77/7441333/eb9aabccadcc/10.1177_0020731420915658-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f77/7441333/960c14adf47c/10.1177_0020731420915658-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f77/7441333/eb9aabccadcc/10.1177_0020731420915658-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
For-Profit Nursing Homes in the Netherlands: What Factors Explain Their Rise?荷兰营利性养老院:哪些因素导致了它们的兴起?
Int J Health Serv. 2020 Oct;50(4):431-443. doi: 10.1177/0020731420915658. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
2
The quasi-market for adult residential care in the UK: Do for-profit, not-for-profit or public sector residential care and nursing homes provide better quality care?英国成人住宿护理的准市场:营利性、非营利性或公共部门的住宿护理院及疗养院能提供质量更好的护理服务吗?
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Apr;179:137-146. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.02.037. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
3
Consumer information and competition between nonprofit and for-profit nursing homes.消费者信息以及非营利性与营利性养老院之间的竞争。
J Health Econ. 1999 Apr;18(2):219-40. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(98)00035-6.
4
Do public nursing home care providers deliver higher quality than private providers? Evidence from Sweden.公立养老院护理服务提供者的服务质量是否高于私立提供者?来自瑞典的证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 14;17(1):487. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2403-0.
5
The effects of ownership and ownership change on nursing home industry costs.所有权及所有权变更对疗养院行业成本的影响。
Health Serv Res. 1996 Aug;31(3):327-46.
6
Competitive spillovers across non-profit and for-profit nursing homes.非营利性和营利性养老院之间的竞争溢出效应。
J Health Econ. 2003 Jan;22(1):1-22. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(02)00093-0.
7
Quality of care in nursing homes: an analysis of relationships among profit, quality, and ownership.养老院的护理质量:对利润、质量和所有权之间关系的分析。
Med Care. 2003 Dec;41(12):1318-30. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000100586.33970.58.
8
Does the public sector outperform the nonprofit and for-profit sectors? Evidence from a national panel study on nursing home quality and access.公共部门的表现是否优于非营利部门和营利部门?来自一项关于养老院质量和可及性的全国性面板研究的证据。
J Policy Anal Manage. 2008 Spring;27(2):326-53. doi: 10.1002/pam.20327.
9
Comparative Performance of Private Equity-Owned US Nursing Homes During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间私募股权拥有的美国养老院的表现比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2026702. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.26702.
10
Financial performance, employee well-being, and client well-being in for-profit and not-for-profit nursing homes: A systematic review.营利性和非营利性养老院的财务绩效、员工福利和客户福利:系统评价。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2017 Oct/Dec;42(4):352-368. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000121.

引用本文的文献

1
Total healthcare costs of deinstitutionalized long-term care provision in the Netherlands: an instrumental variable analysis.荷兰非机构化长期护理服务的总体医疗保健成本:一项工具变量分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 10;25(1):529. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12693-x.
2
How outsourcing has contributed to England's social care crisis.外包是如何导致英国社会护理危机的。
BMJ. 2024 Nov 13;387:e080380. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-080380.
3
Evaluating trends in private equity ownership and impacts on health outcomes, costs, and quality: systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
The Dutch health system in 2019: Many major reforms, but still work in progress.2019年的荷兰医疗体系:进行了多项重大改革,但仍在不断完善中。
Health Policy. 2019 Mar;123(3):249-251. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.02.005.
2
Public/private ownership and quality of care: Evidence from Danish nursing homes.公有/私有产权与医疗服务质量:来自丹麦养老院的证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Nov;216:41-49. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.09.029. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
3
Financial performance, employee well-being, and client well-being in for-profit and not-for-profit nursing homes: A systematic review.
评估私募股权投资所有权的趋势及其对健康结果、成本和质量的影响:系统评价。
BMJ. 2023 Jul 19;382:e075244. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-075244.
4
Equity financing intention of elderly care enterprises: Influence of institutional logic and operation mode.养老企业股权融资意向:制度逻辑与运营模式的影响。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 18;10:811876. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.811876. eCollection 2022.
5
The Impact of Social Distancing Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic on People with Dementia, Family Carers and Healthcare Professionals: A Qualitative Study.由于 COVID-19 大流行而采取的社交隔离措施对痴呆症患者、家庭照顾者和医疗保健专业人员的影响:一项定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 4;19(1):519. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010519.
6
The Increasing Investment of Real Estate in the Health System-A Comparison between the USA and Europe.房地产在医疗体系中的投资不断增加——美国与欧洲的比较。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Nov 25;9(12):1633. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9121633.
7
How the logics of the market, bureaucracy, professionalism and care are reconciled in practice: an empirical ethics approach.如何在实践中协调市场、官僚主义、专业主义和关怀的逻辑:一种经验伦理方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 10;20(1):1024. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05870-7.
营利性和非营利性养老院的财务绩效、员工福利和客户福利:系统评价。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2017 Oct/Dec;42(4):352-368. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000121.
4
Do public nursing home care providers deliver higher quality than private providers? Evidence from Sweden.公立养老院护理服务提供者的服务质量是否高于私立提供者?来自瑞典的证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 14;17(1):487. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2403-0.
5
Marketization in Long-Term Care: A Cross-Country Comparison of Large For-Profit Nursing Home Chains.长期护理的市场化:大型营利性连锁养老院的跨国比较
Health Serv Insights. 2017 Jun 8;10:1178632917710533. doi: 10.1177/1178632917710533. eCollection 2017.
6
The quasi-market for adult residential care in the UK: Do for-profit, not-for-profit or public sector residential care and nursing homes provide better quality care?英国成人住宿护理的准市场:营利性、非营利性或公共部门的住宿护理院及疗养院能提供质量更好的护理服务吗?
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Apr;179:137-146. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.02.037. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
7
The policy and politics of the 2015 long-term care reform in the Netherlands.荷兰2015年长期护理改革的政策与政治情况
Health Policy. 2016 Mar;120(3):241-5. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.01.014. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
8
Satisfaction with Massachusetts nursing home care was generally high during 2005-09, with some variability across facilities.2005-09 年期间,马萨诸塞州养老院的护理满意度普遍较高,各机构之间存在一定差异。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Aug;32(8):1416-25. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1416.
9
Nurse staffing and deficiencies in the largest for-profit nursing home chains and chains owned by private equity companies.最大的营利性养老院连锁机构和私募股权公司拥有的养老院连锁机构的护士人员配备和人员短缺问题。
Health Serv Res. 2012 Feb;47(1 Pt 1):106-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01311.x. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
10
Privatization of social services: quality differences in Swedish elderly care.社会服务的私有化:瑞典老年护理中的质量差异。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Feb;72(4):560-7. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.11.012. Epub 2010 Nov 24.