• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Marketization in Long-Term Care: A Cross-Country Comparison of Large For-Profit Nursing Home Chains.长期护理的市场化:大型营利性连锁养老院的跨国比较
Health Serv Insights. 2017 Jun 8;10:1178632917710533. doi: 10.1177/1178632917710533. eCollection 2017.
2
Ownership, financing, and management strategies of the ten largest for-profit nursing home chains in the United States.美国十大营利性养老院连锁集团的所有权、融资和管理策略。
Int J Health Serv. 2011;41(4):725-46. doi: 10.2190/HS.41.4.g.
3
The effects of ownership and ownership change on nursing home industry costs.所有权及所有权变更对疗养院行业成本的影响。
Health Serv Res. 1996 Aug;31(3):327-46.
4
Do public nursing home care providers deliver higher quality than private providers? Evidence from Sweden.公立养老院护理服务提供者的服务质量是否高于私立提供者?来自瑞典的证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 14;17(1):487. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2403-0.
5
Private equity ownership and nursing home financial performance.私募股权投资与养老院财务绩效。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2013 Jul-Sep;38(3):224-33. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e31825729ab.
6
For-Profit Nursing Homes in the Netherlands: What Factors Explain Their Rise?荷兰营利性养老院:哪些因素导致了它们的兴起?
Int J Health Serv. 2020 Oct;50(4):431-443. doi: 10.1177/0020731420915658. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
7
Hidden Owners, Hidden Profits, and Poor Nursing Home Care: A Case Study.隐性所有者、隐性利润与糟糕的养老院护理:一项案例研究
Int J Health Serv. 2015;45(4):779-800. doi: 10.1177/0020731415594772. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
8
Nurse staffing and deficiencies in the largest for-profit nursing home chains and chains owned by private equity companies.最大的营利性养老院连锁机构和私募股权公司拥有的养老院连锁机构的护士人员配备和人员短缺问题。
Health Serv Res. 2012 Feb;47(1 Pt 1):106-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01311.x. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
9
Exploring the relationship between private equity ownership and nursing home performance: a review.探索私募股权所有权与养老院绩效之间的关系:一项综述
Adv Health Care Manag. 2011;11:63-89. doi: 10.1108/s1474-8231(2011)0000011007.
10
Nursing home financial performance: the role of ownership and chain affiliation.养老院财务表现:所有权和连锁隶属关系的作用。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2012 Jul-Sep;37(3):235-45. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e31823dfe13.

引用本文的文献

1
Total healthcare costs of deinstitutionalized long-term care provision in the Netherlands: an instrumental variable analysis.荷兰非机构化长期护理服务的总体医疗保健成本:一项工具变量分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 10;25(1):529. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12693-x.
2
Paid care worker organizing in England: priorities and progress?英国付费护理工作者的组织工作:优先事项与进展?
Front Sociol. 2025 Mar 14;10:1548473. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2025.1548473. eCollection 2025.
3
Does outsourcing enable the survival of good care homes? A longitudinal analysis of all care homes in England, 2011-2023.外包能让优质养老院得以存续吗?对2011年至2023年英格兰所有养老院的纵向分析。
BMJ Public Health. 2024 Jul 29;2(2):e001227. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001227. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Growth of the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly and the role of for-profit programs.老年人全面护理计划的发展及营利性计划的作用。
Health Aff Sch. 2025 Jan 16;3(1):qxae174. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae174. eCollection 2025 Jan.
5
How outsourcing has contributed to England's social care crisis.外包是如何导致英国社会护理危机的。
BMJ. 2024 Nov 13;387:e080380. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-080380.
6
Involuntary closures of for-profit care homes in England by the Care Quality Commission.英格兰医疗质量委员会强制关闭营利性养老院。
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2024 Apr;5(4):e297-e302. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00008-4. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
7
Older adults' experiences of self-determination when needing homecare services-an interview study.老年人在需要家庭护理服务时的自主体验:一项访谈研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Dec 8;23(1):824. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04533-6.
8
The Association of Organizational, Environmental, and Staffing Characteristics of Residential Care Facilities and the Risk Rating of Statutory Notifications: A Cross-Sectional Study in Ireland.爱尔兰的一项横断研究:居住护理机构的组织、环境和人员配备特征与法定通知风险评级之间的关联。
J Patient Saf. 2024 Mar 1;20(2):131-137. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001185. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
9
Beyond crisis? Using rent theory to understand the restructuring of publicly funded seniors' care in British Columbia, Canada.超越危机?运用租金理论理解加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省公共资助的老年人护理体系的重组
Environ Plan A. 2023 Sep;55(6):1506-1527. doi: 10.1177/0308518X20983152. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
10
Evaluating trends in private equity ownership and impacts on health outcomes, costs, and quality: systematic review.评估私募股权投资所有权的趋势及其对健康结果、成本和质量的影响:系统评价。
BMJ. 2023 Jul 19;382:e075244. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-075244.

本文引用的文献

1
Staffing in Ontario's Long-Term Care Homes: Differences by Profit Status and Chain Ownership.安大略省长期护理院的人员配备:按盈利状况和连锁所有权划分的差异
Can J Aging. 2016 Jun;35(2):175-89. doi: 10.1017/S0714980816000192.
2
Low-Quality Nursing Homes Were More Likely Than Other Nursing Homes To Be Bought Or Sold By Chains In 1993-2010.1993年至2010年期间,低质量疗养院比其他疗养院更有可能被连锁机构收购或出售。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 May 1;35(5):907-14. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1042.
3
The Need for Higher Minimum Staffing Standards in U.S. Nursing Homes.美国疗养院提高最低人员配备标准的必要性。
Health Serv Insights. 2016 Apr 12;9:13-9. doi: 10.4137/HSI.S38994. eCollection 2016.
4
Observational Evidence of For-Profit Delivery and Inferior Nursing Home Care: When Is There Enough Evidence for Policy Change?营利性养老服务与劣质养老院护理的观察证据:何时有足够证据推动政策变革?
PLoS Med. 2016 Apr 19;13(4):e1001995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001995. eCollection 2016 Apr.
5
Hidden Owners, Hidden Profits, and Poor Nursing Home Care: A Case Study.隐性所有者、隐性利润与糟糕的养老院护理:一项案例研究
Int J Health Serv. 2015;45(4):779-800. doi: 10.1177/0020731415594772. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
6
The effects of regulation and litigation on a large for-profit nursing home chain.监管与诉讼对一家大型营利性养老院连锁机构的影响。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2014 Aug;39(4):781-809. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2743039. Epub 2014 May 19.
7
Nursing home ownership trends and their impacts on quality of care: a study using detailed ownership data from Texas.养老院所有权趋势及其对护理质量的影响:一项使用德克萨斯州详细所有权数据的研究。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2013;25(1):30-47. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2012.705702.
8
Effect of nursing home ownership on the quality of post-acute care: an instrumental variables approach.养老院所有权对康复后护理质量的影响:工具变量法。
J Health Econ. 2013 Jan;32(1):12-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.08.007. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
9
Private equity ownership and nursing home financial performance.私募股权投资与养老院财务绩效。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2013 Jul-Sep;38(3):224-33. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e31825729ab.
10
Complaints in for-profit, non-profit and public nursing homes in two Canadian provinces.加拿大两个省份营利性、非营利性和公立养老院的投诉情况。
Open Med. 2011;5(4):e183-92. Epub 2011 Nov 15.

长期护理的市场化:大型营利性连锁养老院的跨国比较

Marketization in Long-Term Care: A Cross-Country Comparison of Large For-Profit Nursing Home Chains.

作者信息

Harrington Charlene, Jacobsen Frode F, Panos Justin, Pollock Allyson, Sutaria Shailen, Szebehely Marta

机构信息

Department of Social & Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Center for Care Research, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Health Serv Insights. 2017 Jun 8;10:1178632917710533. doi: 10.1177/1178632917710533. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1177/1178632917710533
PMID:28634428
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5467918/
Abstract

This article presents cross-country comparisons of trends in for-profit nursing home chains in Canada, Norway, Sweden, United Kingdom, and the United States. Using public and private industry reports, the study describes ownership, corporate strategies, costs, and quality of the 5 largest for-profit chains in each country. The findings show that large for-profit nursing home chains are increasingly owned by private equity investors, have had many ownership changes over time, and have complex organizational structures. Large for-profit nursing home chains increasingly dominate the market and their strategies include the separation of property from operations, diversification, the expansion to many locations, and the use of tax havens. Generally, the chains have large revenues with high profit margins with some documented quality problems. The lack of adequate public information about the ownership, costs, and quality of services provided by nursing home chains is problematic in all the countries. The marketization of nursing home care poses new challenges to governments in collecting and reporting information to control costs as well as to ensure quality and public accountability.

摘要

本文呈现了加拿大、挪威、瑞典、英国和美国营利性养老院连锁机构的跨国趋势比较。该研究利用公共和私营行业报告,描述了每个国家最大的5家营利性连锁机构的所有权、企业战略、成本和质量。研究结果表明,大型营利性养老院连锁机构越来越多地由私募股权投资者所有,随着时间推移经历了多次所有权变更,并且拥有复杂的组织结构。大型营利性养老院连锁机构在市场中占据主导地位的趋势日益明显,其战略包括资产与运营分离、多元化、向多地扩张以及利用避税天堂。总体而言,这些连锁机构收入丰厚,利润率高,但存在一些记录在案的质量问题。在所有国家,养老院连锁机构的所有权、成本和所提供服务质量方面缺乏足够的公开信息都是个问题。养老院护理的市场化给各国政府在收集和报告信息以控制成本以及确保质量和公共问责方面带来了新挑战。