Suppr超能文献

1 型糖尿病患者心血管疾病首发表现的危险因素不同。

Risk factors differ by first manifestation of cardiovascular disease in type 1 diabetes.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, United States.

Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, United States.

出版信息

Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020 May;163:108141. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108141. Epub 2020 Apr 8.

Abstract

AIMS

We compared risk factors for three CVD manifestations and a composite outcome over 25 years' follow-up in the Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications (EDC) prospective cohort study of childhood-onset (<17 years) type 1 diabetes (n = 658).

METHODS

First CVD manifestations examined were: (1) major atherosclerotic cardiovascular event (MACE, i.e. CVD death, myocardial infarction, stroke), (2) coronary revascularization, (3) soft coronary artery disease (CAD, i.e. ischemia ECG, angina), and a (4) composite (MACE + revascularization) outcome. Baseline and time-varying mean and current risk factors, including medication use, were assessed, in diabetes duration-adjusted models.

RESULTS

MACE (n = 107) was predicted by ln(albumin excretion rate) (AER, HR = 1.3, p < 0.0001), systolic BP (SBP, HR = 1.03, p < 0.0001), white blood cell count (WBC, HR = 1.2, p < 0.0001), HbA1c (HR = 1.2p = 0.03), LDLc (HR = 1.01, p = 0.03). Soft CAD (n = 91) was predicted by ln(AER) (HR = 1.2, p = 0.004), SBP (HR = 1.03, p = 0.0002), WBC (HR = 1.2, p = 0.0003), HbA1c (HR = 1.2, p = 0.005). Revascularization (n = 38) was predicted by LDLc (HR = 1.03, p < 0.0001), eGFR (HR = 0.98, p = 0.002), HbA1c (HR = 1.3, p = 0.03). Adding revascularization to MACE enhanced the role of LDLc, while diminishing that of HbA1c, compared to MACE alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Important risk factor associations may be affected by examining composite CVD outcomes. More research is needed to determine how to best incorporate revascularization into composite CVD definitions.

摘要

目的

我们比较了 658 名儿童期(<17 岁) 1 型糖尿病患者(Pittsburgh 糖尿病并发症流行病学 [EDC] 前瞻性队列研究)在 25 年随访期间三种心血管疾病(CVD)表现和复合结局的风险因素。

方法

首先检查的 CVD 表现是:(1)主要动脉粥样硬化性心血管事件(MACE,即 CVD 死亡、心肌梗死、中风),(2)冠状动脉血运重建,(3)软冠状动脉疾病(CAD,即缺血性心电图、心绞痛),和(4)复合(MACE+血运重建)结局。在糖尿病病程调整模型中,评估基线和时变的平均和当前风险因素,包括药物使用情况。

结果

MACE(n=107)由 ln(白蛋白排泄率)(AER,HR=1.3,p<0.0001)、收缩压(SBP,HR=1.03,p<0.0001)、白细胞计数(WBC,HR=1.2,p<0.0001)、HbA1c(HR=1.2,p=0.03)和 LDLc(HR=1.01,p=0.03)预测。软 CAD(n=91)由 ln(AER)(HR=1.2,p=0.004)、SBP(HR=1.03,p=0.0002)、WBC(HR=1.2,p=0.0003)和 HbA1c(HR=1.2,p=0.005)预测。血运重建(n=38)由 LDLc(HR=1.03,p<0.0001)、eGFR(HR=0.98,p=0.002)和 HbA1c(HR=1.3,p=0.03)预测。与仅 MACE 相比,将血运重建加入 MACE 可增强 LDLc 的作用,同时降低 HbA1c 的作用。

结论

检查复合 CVD 结局可能会影响重要的风险因素关联。需要进一步研究如何将血运重建最佳纳入复合 CVD 定义。

相似文献

9
Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease in Type 1 Diabetes.1型糖尿病患者心血管疾病的危险因素
Diabetes. 2016 May;65(5):1370-9. doi: 10.2337/db15-1517. Epub 2016 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

5
The Remnant Lipoprotein Hypothesis of Diabetes-Associated Cardiovascular Disease.糖尿病相关心血管疾病的残余脂蛋白假说。
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2022 Jul;42(7):819-830. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.122.317163. Epub 2022 May 26.
7
Cardiovascular Risk Management in Type 1 Diabetes.1 型糖尿病的心血管风险管理。
Curr Diab Rep. 2021 Aug 26;21(9):29. doi: 10.1007/s11892-021-01400-9.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验