• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于隐私保护的敏感数据分割技术的试点评估。

Pilot evaluation of sensitive data segmentation technology for privacy.

作者信息

Grando Adela, Sottara Davide, Singh Ripudaman, Murcko Anita, Soni Hiral, Tang Tianyu, Idouraine Nassim, Todd Michael, Mote Mike, Chern Darwyn, Dye Christy, Whitfield Mary Jo

机构信息

Biomedical Informatics, College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Scottsdale, AZ, United States.

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2020 Jun;138:104121. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104121. Epub 2020 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104121
PMID:32278288
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7229704/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Consent2Share (C2S) is an open source software created by the Office of the National Coordinator Data Segmentation for Privacy initiative to support electronic health record (EHR) granular segmentation. To date, there are no published formal evaluations of Consent2Share.

METHOD

Structured data (e.g. medications) codified using standard clinical terminologies (e.g. RxNorm) was extracted from the EHR of 36 patients with behavioral health conditions from study sites. EHRs were available through a health information exchange and two sites. The EHR data was already classified into data types (e.g. procedures and services). Both Consent2Share and health providers classified EHR data based on value sets (e.g. mental health) and sensitivity (e.g. not sensitive. Descriptive statistics and Chi-square analysis were used to compare differences between data categorizations.

RESULTS

From the resulting 1,080 medical records items, 584 were distinct. Significant differences were found between sensitivity classifications by Consent2Share and providers (χ2 (2, N = 584) = 114.74, p = <0.0001). Sensitivity comparisons led to 56.0 % of agreements, 31.2 % disagreements, and 12.8 % partial agreements. Most (97.8 %) disagreements resulted from information classified as not sensitive by Consent2Share, but sensitive by provider (e.g. behavioral health prevention education service). In terms of data types, most disagreements (57.1 %) focused on procedures and services information (e.g. ligation of fallopian tube). When considering value sets, most disagreements focused on genetic data (100.0 %), followed by sexual and reproductive health (88.9 %).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need to further validate Consent2Share before broad use in health care settings. The outcomes from this pilot study will help guide improvements in segmentation logic of tools like Consent2Share and may set the stage for a new generation of personalized consent engines.

摘要

背景

“同意共享”(C2S)是由国家协调员办公室为隐私倡议进行数据分割而创建的开源软件,旨在支持电子健康记录(EHR)的细粒度分割。迄今为止,尚未有关于“同意共享”的正式评估发表。

方法

从研究地点的36名患有行为健康疾病患者的电子健康记录中提取使用标准临床术语(如RxNorm)编码的结构化数据(如药物)。电子健康记录可通过健康信息交换平台和两个站点获取。电子健康记录数据已被分类为数据类型(如程序和服务)。“同意共享”和医疗服务提供者均根据值集(如心理健康)和敏感度(如不敏感)对电子健康记录数据进行分类。使用描述性统计和卡方分析来比较数据分类之间的差异。

结果

在生成的1080份医疗记录项目中,有584项是不同的。发现“同意共享”和提供者在敏感度分类上存在显著差异(χ2(2,N = 584)= 114.74,p = <0.0001)。敏感度比较导致56.0%的一致性、31.2%的不一致性和12.8%的部分一致性。大多数(97.8%)不一致是由于“同意共享”分类为不敏感但提供者分类为敏感的信息(如行为健康预防教育服务)。就数据类型而言,大多数不一致(57.1%)集中在程序和服务信息(如输卵管结扎)。在考虑值集时,大多数不一致集中在基因数据(100.0%),其次是性健康和生殖健康(88.9%)。

结论

在医疗保健环境中广泛使用之前,需要进一步验证“同意共享”。这项试点研究的结果将有助于指导改进“同意共享”等工具的分割逻辑,并可能为新一代个性化同意引擎奠定基础。

相似文献

1
Pilot evaluation of sensitive data segmentation technology for privacy.用于隐私保护的敏感数据分割技术的试点评估。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Jun;138:104121. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104121. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
2
My data choices: Pilot evaluation of patient-controlled medical record sharing technology.我的数据选择:患者自控病历共享技术的初步评估。
Health Informatics J. 2022 Oct-Dec;28(4):14604582221143893. doi: 10.1177/14604582221143893.
3
A pilot comparison of medical records sensitivity perspectives of patients with behavioral health conditions and healthcare providers.行为健康状况患者与医疗保健提供者的医疗记录敏感性视角的初步比较。
Health Informatics J. 2021 Apr-Jun;27(2):14604582211009925. doi: 10.1177/14604582211009925.
4
State of the art and a mixed-method personalized approach to assess patient perceptions on medical record sharing and sensitivity.评估患者对病历共享和敏感性看法的最新技术与混合方法个性化途径
J Biomed Inform. 2020 Jan;101:103338. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103338. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
5
Physicians differ in their perceptions of sensitive medical records: Survey and interview study.医生对敏感医疗记录的认知存在差异:调查与访谈研究。
Health Informatics J. 2023 Jul-Sep;29(3):14604582231193519. doi: 10.1177/14604582231193519.
6
The role of health care experience and consumer information efficacy in shaping privacy and security perceptions of medical records: national consumer survey results.医疗保健体验和消费者信息效能在塑造病历隐私和安全认知方面的作用:全国消费者调查结果。
JMIR Med Inform. 2015 Apr 2;3(2):e14. doi: 10.2196/medinform.3238.
7
Impacts of mobile tablet computing on provider productivity, communications, and the process of care.移动平板电脑计算对医疗服务提供者的工作效率、沟通及护理流程的影响。
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Apr;88:62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.01.010. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
8
A method for cohort selection of cardiovascular disease records from an electronic health record system.一种从电子健康记录系统中选择心血管疾病记录队列的方法。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jun;102:138-149. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.03.015. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
9
The double-edged sword of electronic health records: implications for patient disclosure.电子健康记录的双刃剑:对患者信息披露的影响
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Apr;22(e1):e130-40. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002804. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
10
Patient and public views about the security and privacy of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) in the UK: results from a mixed methods study.英国患者及公众对电子健康记录(EHRs)安全性和隐私性的看法:一项混合方法研究的结果
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Oct 14;15:86. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0202-2.

引用本文的文献

1
FHIR Granular Sensitive Data Segmentation.FHIR 细粒度敏感数据分割
Appl Clin Inform. 2025 Jan;16(1):156-166. doi: 10.1055/a-2466-4371. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
2
Ingredient-based method to create medication lists and support granular data segmentation.基于成分的方法来创建用药清单并支持细粒度数据分割。
Health Informatics J. 2025 Jan-Mar;31(1):14604582251316781. doi: 10.1177/14604582251316781.
3
Physicians' Perspectives on HL7 Information Policy Sensitive Value Set: A Validation Study through Health Concept Categorization.医生对HL7信息政策敏感值集的看法:通过健康概念分类进行的验证研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 28;11(21):2845. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11212845.
4
Behavioral Health Professionals' Perceptions on Patient-Controlled Granular Information Sharing (Part 2): Focus Group Study.行为健康专业人员对患者控制的细粒度信息共享的看法(第2部分):焦点小组研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2022 Apr 20;9(4):e18792. doi: 10.2196/18792.
5
A pilot comparison of medical records sensitivity perspectives of patients with behavioral health conditions and healthcare providers.行为健康状况患者与医疗保健提供者的医疗记录敏感性视角的初步比较。
Health Informatics J. 2021 Apr-Jun;27(2):14604582211009925. doi: 10.1177/14604582211009925.

本文引用的文献

1
GRANULAR PATIENT CONTROL OF PERSONAL HEALTH INFORMATION: FEDERAL AND STATE LAW CONSIDERATIONS.个人健康信息的颗粒状患者控制:联邦和州法律考量
Jurimetrics. 2018 Summer;58(4):411-435.
2
State of the art and a mixed-method personalized approach to assess patient perceptions on medical record sharing and sensitivity.评估患者对病历共享和敏感性看法的最新技术与混合方法个性化途径
J Biomed Inform. 2020 Jan;101:103338. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103338. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
3
Perceptions and Preferences About Granular Data Sharing and Privacy of Behavioral Health Patients.行为健康患者对颗粒数据共享和隐私的认知与偏好
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Aug 21;264:1361-1365. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190449.
4
Using Health Information Exchange: Usage and Perceived Usefulness in Primary Care.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Aug 21;264:709-713. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190315.
5
A Study to Elicit Behavioral Health Patients' and Providers' Opinions on Health Records Consent.一项征集行为健康患者和医疗服务提供者对健康记录同意书看法的研究。
J Law Med Ethics. 2017 Jun;45(2):238-259. doi: 10.1177/1073110517720653. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
6
Systematic Literature Review of Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs.处方药监测项目的系统文献综述
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Dec 5;2018:1478-1487. eCollection 2018.
7
Interpretation and integration of the federal substance use privacy protection rule in integrated health systems: A qualitative analysis.联邦物质使用隐私保护规则在综合卫生系统中的解释和整合:定性分析。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019 Feb;97:41-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.11.005. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
8
SNOMED CT Concept Hierarchies for Sharing Definitions of Clinical Conditions Using Electronic Health Record Data.使用电子健康记录数据共享临床病症定义的SNOMED CT概念层次结构。
Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Jul;9(3):667-682. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1668090. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
9
The benefits of health information exchange: an updated systematic review.健康信息交换的益处:更新的系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Sep 1;25(9):1259-1265. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy035.
10
Health information exchange associated with improved emergency department care through faster accessing of patient information from outside organizations.通过更快地从外部组织获取患者信息,健康信息交换有助于改善急诊科护理。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e103-e110. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw116.