Clinic for Animal Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Koenigsweg 65, 14163 Berlin, Germany.
Department of Veterinary Sciences, Chair of Animal Welfare, Ethology, Animal Hygiene and Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, LMU Munich, Veterinärstraße 13, 80539 Munich, Germany.
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Jun;103(6):5387-5397. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17928. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
The objective of this study was to evaluate different analytical methods of assessing failure of passive transfer (FPT) in neonatal calves. We hypothesized that 3 different media (i.e., centrifuged serum, centrifuged plasma, filtered plasma) and different analytical methods [i.e., ELISA, capillary electrophoresis (CE), Brix refractometer, and handheld optical refractometer] would be highly correlated with the gold standard radial immunodiffusion (RID) and would generate comparable results. Serum and plasma blood samples were collected from Holstein Friesian calves (n = 216) aged 1 to 7 d, from 2 commercial dairy herds in northeast Germany. The RID analysis showed that 59 of 216 calves (27%) had serum IgG concentrations of <10 mg/mL and 157 calves (73%) had serum concentrations of ≥10 mg/mL. The mean IgG concentration (± standard deviation) was 17.1 ± 9.8 mg/mL, and the range was 0.8 to 47.8 mg/mL. In serum, the correlation between RID and CE was r = 0.97, and between RID and ELISA was r = 0.90; CE and ELISA were also highly correlated (r = 0.89). Both refractometry methods were highly correlated with RID using centrifuged serum, centrifuged plasma, or filtered plasma (Brix refractometer: r = 0.84, 0.80, and 0.78, respectively; handheld optical refractometer: r = 0.83, 0.81, and 0.80, respectively). We determined test characteristics (optimum thresholds, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the curve) for CE, ELISA, and the handheld optical and digital refractometers using receiver operating characteristic curve analyses with RID as the reference value. Optimal thresholds for assessing FPT using plasma were higher than for serum, regardless of the method of plasma harvesting. The 4 different devices had comparable areas under the curve, irrespective of the medium used. All analytical methods can be used to assess FPT.
本研究旨在评估不同的分析方法评估新生犊牛被动传递失败(FPT)。我们假设 3 种不同的介质(即离心血清、离心血浆、过滤血浆)和不同的分析方法(即酶联免疫吸附试验、毛细管电泳、Brix 折射计和手持式光学折射计)与金标准放射免疫扩散(RID)高度相关,并产生可比的结果。血清和血浆血液样本采集自年龄在 1 至 7 天的荷斯坦弗里生犊牛(n=216),来自德国东北部的 2 个商业奶牛场。RID 分析显示,216 头犊牛中有 59 头(27%)血清 IgG 浓度<10mg/mL,157 头(73%)血清浓度≥10mg/mL。平均 IgG 浓度(±标准偏差)为 17.1±9.8mg/mL,范围为 0.8 至 47.8mg/mL。在血清中,RID 与 CE 之间的相关性为 r=0.97,与 ELISA 之间的相关性为 r=0.90;CE 和 ELISA 之间也高度相关(r=0.89)。两种折射计方法与 RID 均与离心血清、离心血浆或过滤血浆高度相关(Brix 折射计:r=0.84、0.80 和 0.78;手持式光学折射计:r=0.83、0.81 和 0.80)。我们使用 RID 作为参考值,通过接受者操作特征曲线分析确定 CE、ELISA 和手持式光学和数字折射计的测试特征(最佳阈值、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和曲线下面积)。使用血浆评估 FPT 的最佳阈值高于血清,无论血浆采集方法如何。无论使用何种介质,这 4 种不同的设备的曲线下面积都具有可比性。所有分析方法都可用于评估 FPT。