ProNobis Health, San Francisco, CA.
UC Berkeley School of Law, Berkeley, CA.
J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Jun;230(6):1111-1113. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.03.031. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
This article proposes systems for the fair distribution of scarce resources to healthcare providers. It builds on classic ethical structures and adapts them to the equitable distribution of personal protective equipment (PPE) to clinicians at risk of contracting novel corona virus-19 (COVID-19). The article also defines systems of allocation that are generally considered unethical and are to be avoided. We emphasize that policies must be transparent, collaborative, applied equally, and have a system of accountability. It is recognized that unless the supply of PPE is quickly replenished, or viable alternatives to traditional equipment are devised in the coming days to weeks, hospitals and healthcare systems will face the difficult task of rationing PPE to at-risk clinicians. This paper suggests an ethical framework for that process.
本文为医疗保健提供者提出了公平分配稀缺资源的系统。它建立在经典的伦理结构之上,并将其适应于向有感染新型冠状病毒-19(COVID-19)风险的临床医生公平分配个人防护设备(PPE)。本文还定义了通常被认为不道德且应避免的分配系统。我们强调政策必须具有透明度、协作性、平等应用和问责制。除非 PPE 的供应能够迅速得到补充,或者在未来几天到几周内设计出传统设备的可行替代品,否则医院和医疗保健系统将面临向有风险的临床医生分配 PPE 的艰巨任务。本文为该过程提供了一个伦理框架。