• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Association of Guideline-Recommended COPD Inhaler Regimens With Mortality, Respiratory Exacerbations, and Quality of Life: A Secondary Analysis of the Long-Term Oxygen Treatment Trial.指南推荐的 COPD 吸入器方案与死亡率、呼吸恶化和生活质量的关联:长期氧疗试验的二次分析。
Chest. 2020 Aug;158(2):529-538. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.02.073. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
2
Effects of inhaled corticosteroids /long-acting agonists in a single inhaler versus inhaled corticosteroids alone on all-cause mortality, pneumonia, and fracture in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A nationwide cohort study 2002-2013.吸入皮质类固醇/长效激动剂单药与吸入皮质类固醇单独治疗在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者全因死亡率、肺炎和骨折中的影响:2002-2013 年全国队列研究。
Respir Med. 2017 Sep;130:75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.07.012. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
3
Single inhaler triple therapy versus inhaled corticosteroid plus long-acting β2-agonist therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (TRILOGY): a double-blind, parallel group, randomised controlled trial.三联吸入治疗与吸入性皮质类固醇加长效β2-激动剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(TRILOGY):一项双盲、平行组、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2016 Sep 3;388(10048):963-73. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31354-X. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
4
Low-dose oral theophylline combined with inhaled corticosteroids for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and high risk of exacerbations: a RCT.低剂量茶碱口服联合吸入皮质激素治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病且有加重高风险的患者:一项 RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Jul;23(37):1-146. doi: 10.3310/hta23370.
5
Real-life evaluation of COPD treatment in a Bulgarian population: a 1-year prospective, observational, noninterventional study.保加利亚人群慢性阻塞性肺疾病治疗的真实生活评估:一项为期1年的前瞻性、观察性、非干预性研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Feb 22;13:653-663. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S153969. eCollection 2018.
6
The effects of single inhaler triple therapy vs single inhaler dual therapy or separate triple therapy for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.单吸入器三联疗法与单吸入器双联疗法或单独三联疗法治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的效果:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Jul 11;14:1539-1548. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S200846. eCollection 2019.
7
Inhaled corticosteroids versus long-acting beta(2)-agonists for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.吸入性糖皮质激素与长效β₂受体激动剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5(10):CD007033. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007033.pub2.
8
Single-inhaler triple therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review.单吸入器三联疗法治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者:系统评价。
Respir Res. 2019 Nov 4;20(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12931-019-1213-9.
9
Factors influencing treatment escalation from long-acting muscarinic antagonist monotherapy to triple therapy in patients with COPD: a retrospective THIN-database analysis.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者从长效抗毒蕈碱单一疗法升级至三联疗法的治疗影响因素:一项回顾性THIN数据库分析
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Mar 5;13:781-792. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S153655. eCollection 2018.
10
Alignment of Inhaled Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Therapies with Published Strategies. Analysis of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Recommendations in SPIROMICS.吸入性慢性阻塞性肺病治疗与已发表策略的一致性。SPIROMICS 中对全球慢性阻塞性肺病倡议建议的分析。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Feb;16(2):200-208. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201804-283OC.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving Patient-Centric COPD Management.改善以患者为中心的慢性阻塞性肺疾病管理。
Fed Pract. 2024 Nov;41(Suppl 6):S35-S40. doi: 10.12788/fp.0534. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
2
A Syndemic Model: COPD, Multimorbidity, and Poverty.一种综合征模型:慢性阻塞性肺疾病、多重疾病与贫困
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2024 Sep 27;11(5):437-443. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.2024.0558.
3
The Correlation Between Cardiac Oxidative Stress and Inflammatory Cytokine Response Following Myocardial Infarction.心肌梗死后心脏氧化应激与炎症细胞因子反应的相关性。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023 Jan-Dec;29:10760296231211907. doi: 10.1177/10760296231211907.
4
Adverse Effects, Smoking, Alcohol Consumption, and Quality of Life during Long-Term Oxygen Therapy: A Nationwide Study.长期氧疗期间的不良反应、吸烟、饮酒与生活质量:一项全国性研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Oct;19(10):1677-1686. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202110-1174OC.
5
Association of Patient and Primary Care Provider Factors with Outpatient COPD Care Quality.患者及基层医疗服务提供者因素与慢性阻塞性肺疾病门诊护理质量的关联
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2022 Jan 27;9(1):55-67. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.2021.0232.
6
Initiative to Improve Evidence-Based Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Hospitalist Care Using a Novel On-Line Gamification Patient Simulation Tool: A Prospective Study.使用新型在线游戏化患者模拟工具改善慢性阻塞性肺疾病住院医生循证护理的倡议:一项前瞻性研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Sep 26;9(10):1267. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9101267.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of LABA-LAMA vs LABA-ICS Treatment of COPD in Real-World Clinical Practice.在真实临床实践中,LABA-LAMA 与 LABA-ICS 治疗 COPD 的疗效和安全性比较。
Chest. 2019 Jun;155(6):1158-1165. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
2
Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease: the GOLD science committee report 2019.全球慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊断、管理和预防策略:GOLD 科学委员会报告 2019.
Eur Respir J. 2019 May 18;53(5). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00164-2019. Print 2019 May.
3
Mortality and Exacerbations by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Groups ABCD: 2011 Versus 2017 in the COPDGene® Cohort.慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议ABCD组的死亡率和急性加重情况:COPDGene®队列中2011年与2017年对比
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2019 Jan 10;6(1):64-73. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.6.1.2018.0130.
4
What is the impact of GOLD 2017 recommendations in primary care? - a descriptive study of patient classifications, treatment burden and costs.《慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议(GOLD)2017版建议对基层医疗的影响——一项关于患者分类、治疗负担及成本的描述性研究》
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Oct 23;13:3485-3492. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S173664. eCollection 2018.
5
The impact of 2011 and 2017 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (GOLD) guidelines on allocation and pharmacological management of patients with COPD in Taiwan: Taiwan Obstructive Lung Disease (TOLD) study.2011年和2017年慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议(GOLD)指南对台湾慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者分配及药物治疗的影响:台湾阻塞性肺病(TOLD)研究
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Sep 25;13:2949-2959. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S176065. eCollection 2018.
6
Alignment of Inhaled Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Therapies with Published Strategies. Analysis of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Recommendations in SPIROMICS.吸入性慢性阻塞性肺病治疗与已发表策略的一致性。SPIROMICS 中对全球慢性阻塞性肺病倡议建议的分析。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Feb;16(2):200-208. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201804-283OC.
7
Single-Inhaler Triple versus Dual Therapy in Patients with COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者单吸入器三联疗法与双联疗法的比较
N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 9;379(6):592-593. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1807380.
8
Tiotropium and olodaterol in the prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations (DYNAGITO): a double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, active-controlled trial.噻托溴铵和奥达特罗预防慢性阻塞性肺疾病恶化(DYNAGITO):一项双盲、随机、平行分组、阳性对照试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2018 May;6(5):337-344. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30102-4. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
9
Association of sputum and blood eosinophil concentrations with clinical measures of COPD severity: an analysis of the SPIROMICS cohort.痰和血嗜酸性粒细胞浓度与 COPD 严重程度的临床指标的关联:SPIROMICS 队列分析。
Lancet Respir Med. 2017 Dec;5(12):956-967. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30432-0. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
10
The Long-Term Oxygen Treatment Trial for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Rationale, Design, and Lessons Learned.慢性阻塞性肺疾病长期氧疗试验:原理、设计和经验教训。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018 Jan;15(1):89-101. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201705-374SD.

指南推荐的 COPD 吸入器方案与死亡率、呼吸恶化和生活质量的关联:长期氧疗试验的二次分析。

Association of Guideline-Recommended COPD Inhaler Regimens With Mortality, Respiratory Exacerbations, and Quality of Life: A Secondary Analysis of the Long-Term Oxygen Treatment Trial.

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Health Services Research & Development Center of Innovation for Veteran-centered and Value-driven Care, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA.

出版信息

Chest. 2020 Aug;158(2):529-538. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.02.073. Epub 2020 Apr 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2020.02.073
PMID:32278779
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7417382/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although inhaled therapy reduces exacerbations among patients with COPD, the effectiveness of providing inhaled treatment per risk stratification models remains unclear.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Are inhaled regimens that align with the 2017 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) strategy associated with clinically important outcomes?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted secondary analyses of Long-term Oxygen Treatment Trial (LOTT) data. The trial enrolled patients with COPD with moderate resting or exertional hypoxemia between 2009 and 2015. Our exposure was the patient-reported inhaled regimen at enrollment, categorized as either aligning with, undertreating, or potentially overtreating per the 2017 GOLD strategy. Our primary composite outcome was time to death or first hospitalization for COPD. Additional outcomes included individual components of the composite outcome and time to first exacerbation. We generated multivariable Cox proportional hazard models across strata of GOLD-predicted exacerbation risk (high vs low) to estimate between-group hazard ratios for time to event outcomes. We adjusted models a priori for potential confounders, clustered by site.

RESULTS

The trial enrolled 738 patients (73.4% men; mean age, 68.8 years). Of the patients, 571 (77.4%) were low risk for future exacerbations. Of the patients, 233 (31.6%) reported regimens aligning with GOLD recommendations; most regimens (54.1%) potentially overtreated. During a 2.3-year median follow-up, 332 patients (44.9%) experienced the composite outcome. We found no difference in time to composite outcome or death among patients reporting regimens aligning with recommendations compared with undertreated patients. Among patients at low risk, potential overtreatment was associated with higher exacerbation risk (hazard ratio, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.09-1.87), whereas inhaled corticosteroid treatment was associated with 64% higher risk of pneumonia (incidence rate ratio, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.01-2.66).

INTERPRETATION

Among patients with COPD with moderate hypoxemia, we found no difference in clinical outcomes between inhaled regimens aligning with the 2017 GOLD strategy compared with those that were undertreated. These findings suggest the need to reevaluate the effectiveness of risk stratification model-based inhaled treatment strategies.

摘要

背景

尽管吸入疗法可减少 COPD 患者的恶化,但根据风险分层模型提供吸入治疗的效果仍不清楚。

研究问题

与 2017 年全球慢性阻塞性肺疾病倡议 (GOLD) 策略一致的吸入方案是否与临床重要结局相关?

研究设计和方法

我们对长期氧疗试验 (LOTT) 数据进行了二次分析。该试验招募了 2009 年至 2015 年间患有中度静息或运动性低氧血症的 COPD 患者。我们的暴露因素是患者在入组时报告的吸入方案,根据 2017 年 GOLD 策略分为与方案一致、治疗不足或潜在过度治疗。我们的主要复合结局是死亡或首次因 COPD 住院的时间。其他结局包括复合结局的单个组成部分和首次恶化的时间。我们根据 GOLD 预测的恶化风险(高 vs 低)生成了多变量 Cox 比例风险模型,以估计事件时间结局的组间风险比。我们预先根据地点进行了模型调整,以对潜在混杂因素进行分层。

结果

该试验共纳入 738 名患者(73.4%为男性;平均年龄 68.8 岁)。其中 571 名(77.4%)患者未来恶化的风险较低。其中 233 名(31.6%)患者报告的方案与 GOLD 建议一致;大多数方案(54.1%)潜在过度治疗。在中位随访 2.3 年期间,332 名患者(44.9%)发生了复合结局。我们发现,与治疗不足的患者相比,报告与建议一致的方案的患者在复合结局或死亡时间方面没有差异。在低风险患者中,潜在过度治疗与更高的恶化风险相关(风险比,1.42;95%CI,1.09-1.87),而吸入皮质类固醇治疗与肺炎风险增加 64%相关(发病率比,1.64;95%CI,1.01-2.66)。

解释

在患有中度低氧血症的 COPD 患者中,我们发现与 2017 年 GOLD 策略一致的吸入方案与治疗不足的方案相比,临床结局没有差异。这些发现表明需要重新评估基于风险分层模型的吸入治疗策略的有效性。