Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Japan; Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Japan.
Int J Surg. 2020 May;77:198-204. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.03.072. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
The benefits of using energy devices (EDs) such as ultrasonic coagulating shears or electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing devices for thyroid cancer surgery have been evaluated only with limited data obtained from small samples.
Using a Japanese national inpatient database, we identified 59,394 patients with thyroid cancer who underwent thyroidectomy without EDs (without-ED group, n = 32,360) and with EDs (with-ED group, n = 26,764) from July 2010 to March 2017. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed to compare the occurrence of postoperative complications including recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis and chyle leakage, duration of anesthesia, length of stay, total costs, in-hospital mortality rate between the two groups. We also performed multivariate regression analyses using a generalized estimating equation and multiple imputation as a sensitivity analysis.
In the propensity-matched analysis involving 22,108 pairs, no significant differences were found in any postoperative complications (7.4% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.73), duration of anesthesia (217 min vs. 218 min, p = 0.54), length of stay (8.7 days vs. 8.2 days, p = 0.07) and in-hospital mortality rate (0.07% vs. 0.09%, p = 0.61). Compared with the without-ED group, the with-ED group showed a lower occurrence of postoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis (2.3% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.01) but a higher occurrence of postoperative chyle leakage (0.3% vs. 0.1%, p < 0.001) and total cost (US $7246 vs. US $6937, p < 0.001). The multivariate regression analysis showed compatible results with the propensity-matched analysis.
In this large nationwide cohort of patients with thyroid cancer, no significant difference was detected in the proportions of any complications. The use of EDs was associated with a lower occurrence of postoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis but a higher occurrence of postoperative chylothorax and higher cost.
使用能量设备(EDs),如超声凝固剪或电热双极血管密封设备,进行甲状腺癌手术的益处,仅通过从小样本中获得的有限数据进行了评估。
使用日本全国住院患者数据库,我们从 2010 年 7 月至 2017 年 3 月期间,确定了 59394 例未使用 EDs(无 ED 组,n=32360)和使用 EDs(有 ED 组,n=26764)进行甲状腺切除术的甲状腺癌患者。采用 1:1 倾向评分匹配比较两组患者术后并发症(包括喉返神经麻痹和乳糜漏)的发生率、麻醉持续时间、住院时间、总费用和住院死亡率。我们还使用广义估计方程和多重插补进行了多变量回归分析作为敏感性分析。
在涉及 22108 对患者的倾向评分匹配分析中,两组患者术后并发症发生率(7.4% vs. 7.3%,p=0.73)、麻醉持续时间(217 分钟 vs. 218 分钟,p=0.54)、住院时间(8.7 天 vs. 8.2 天,p=0.07)和住院死亡率(0.07% vs. 0.09%,p=0.61)均无显著差异。与无 ED 组相比,ED 组术后喉返神经麻痹发生率较低(2.3% vs. 2.7%,p=0.01),但乳糜漏发生率较高(0.3% vs. 0.1%,p<0.001)和总费用较高(7246 美元 vs. 6937 美元,p<0.001)。多变量回归分析结果与倾向评分匹配分析结果一致。
在这项大型全国性甲状腺癌患者队列研究中,两组患者任何并发症的比例均无显著差异。EDs 的使用与术后喉返神经麻痹发生率降低相关,但与术后乳糜胸发生率升高和成本增加相关。