Zheng Weijie, Zhu Shan, Zhang Yimin, Wang Zhong, Liao Shichong, Sun Shengrong
Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Front Surg. 2022 Aug 26;9:896275. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.896275. eCollection 2022.
Energy-based devices (EBD) have been popularized in thyroidectomy worldwide. Microdissection tungsten needle (MDTN) is characterized by the ultra-sharp tip providing safe and meticulous dissection with effective hemostasis. However, little study has applied MDTN in thyroidectomy.
This retrospective study compared clinical data of the patients who underwent total thyroidectomy (TT) with central neck dissection (CND) using MDTN, harmonic scalpel (HS), and conventional electrocautery (CE). We assessed outcomes related to surgical efficacy and safety. The injury degree of tissue was assessed by biochemical indicators and early-stage inflammatory factors in the drainage fluid. Histological sections of the thyroid specimens were evaluated to compare levels of thermal damage by the three EBD.
There was a significant decrease in the intraoperative blood loss, operation time and 24-hour drainage volume in the MDTN group compared to the CE group. The total drainage volume, duration of drainage, and average length of stay of the MDTN group were less compared to the CE group though they did not reach statistical significance. No disparity was observed between the MDTN group and HS group in these variables. Total costs were not significantly different among these groups. The incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury was the lowest using MDTN compared to the CE ( = 0.034) and HS (not significant). No statistical differences were observed among these groups regarding postoperative wound pain and infection, hypoparathyroidism, and postoperative hemorrhage. Analysis of biochemical indicators showed a lower level of hemoglobin in the MDTN and HS group than the CE group ( = 0.046 and 0.038, respectively) and less triglyceride in the HS group than the MDTN and CE group ( = 0.002 and 0.029, respectively) but no significant difference in cholesterol level in these groups. Early-stage inflammatory factors including TNF-α and IL-6 showed significantly higher concentration in the CE group than the MDTN and HS group. Histological sections of thyroid specimens revealed that MDTN caused the lowest degree of thermal damage followed by HS then CE.
MDTN exhibited comparable surgical efficacy and safety outcomes as HS in thyroidectomy. Therefore, MDTN is a safe and viable alternative for hemostasis in thyroidectomy.
基于能量的器械(EBD)在全球甲状腺切除术中已得到广泛应用。显微解剖钨针(MDTN)的特点是尖端超锋利,能提供安全、细致的解剖且止血效果良好。然而,很少有研究将MDTN应用于甲状腺切除术。
这项回顾性研究比较了使用MDTN、超声刀(HS)和传统电灼术(CE)进行全甲状腺切除术(TT)并伴有中央区淋巴结清扫(CND)的患者的临床资料。我们评估了与手术疗效和安全性相关的结果。通过引流液中的生化指标和早期炎症因子评估组织的损伤程度。对甲状腺标本的组织切片进行评估,以比较三种EBD造成的热损伤程度。
与CE组相比,MDTN组的术中出血量、手术时间和24小时引流量显著减少。MDTN组的总引流量、引流持续时间和平均住院时间虽未达到统计学意义,但均少于CE组。在这些变量方面,MDTN组和HS组之间未观察到差异。这些组之间的总费用无显著差异。与CE组(P = 0.034)和HS组(无显著差异)相比,使用MDTN时喉返神经(RLN)损伤的发生率最低。在术后伤口疼痛和感染、甲状旁腺功能减退以及术后出血方面,这些组之间未观察到统计学差异。生化指标分析显示,MDTN组和HS组的血红蛋白水平低于CE组(分别为P = 0.046和0.038),HS组的甘油三酯水平低于MDTN组和CE组(分别为P = 0.002和0.029),但这些组的胆固醇水平无显著差异。包括肿瘤坏死因子-α和白细胞介素-6在内的早期炎症因子在CE组中的浓度显著高于MDTN组和HS组。甲状腺标本的组织切片显示,MDTN造成的热损伤程度最低,其次是HS,然后是CE。
在甲状腺切除术中,MDTN表现出与HS相当的手术疗效和安全性结果。因此,MDTN是甲状腺切除术中一种安全可行的止血替代方法。