Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020 Jun;41(6):734-736. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.72.
We compared methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSIs) captured by culture-based surveillance and MRSA septicemia hospitalizations captured by administrative coding using statewide hospital discharge data in Connecticut from 2010 to 2018. Observed discrepancies between identification methods suggest administrative coding is inappropriate for assessing trends in MRSA BSIs.
我们比较了 2010 年至 2018 年康涅狄格州全州医院出院数据中基于培养的监测捕获的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)血流感染(BSI)和行政编码捕获的 MRSA 败血症住院数据。鉴定方法之间的观察到的差异表明,行政编码不适合评估 MRSA BSI 的趋势。