Parry Steve, Stachler Shawn, Mahylis Jared
Department of Orthopaedics, Midwestern University/Franciscan Health-Olympia Fields, 20202 S, Crawford Ave, Olympia Fields, IL, 60461, USA.
Tier 1 Orthopedic and Neurosurgical Institute, 105 South Willow Avenue, Cookeville, TN, 38501, USA.
J Orthop. 2020 Mar 27;22:64-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.03.027. eCollection 2020 Nov-Dec.
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty, as originally designed by Grammont, has revolutionized the treatment of rotator cuff arthropathy as well as fractures about the proximal humerus. The original design consisted of glenoid and humeral components with a medialized center or rotation compared to the native shoulder. Long term outcome studies on this design demonstrated high rates of scapular notching as well as significant loss of external rotation. To combat these flaws, prosthesis design has evolved to include the concept of lateralization whereby the center of rotation is moved laterally compared to the Grammont prosthesis via either the glenoid or humeral components. Lateralization via the glenoid component has sought to reduce scapular notching, however, concerns over early loosening have been raised secondary to increasing stress at the glenosphere/glenoid interface. Lateralization via the humeral component has been theorized to improve the mechanics of the remaining rotator cuff and deltoid musculature while avoiding the problems inherent with glenoid lateralization. While limited clinical evidence is available currently to support one design over the other, multiple biomechanical studies have shown improvements in rates of scapular notching and post-operative external rotation for lateralized humeral and glenoid components. Future research should aim to delineate advantages of one design over the other or optimal combinations of the two designs.
由格拉蒙特最初设计的反式肩关节置换术,彻底改变了肩袖关节病以及肱骨近端骨折的治疗方式。与天然肩关节相比,其最初设计包括关节盂和肱骨组件,且旋转中心向内侧偏移。对该设计的长期疗效研究表明,肩胛切迹发生率较高,且外旋明显丧失。为克服这些缺陷,假体设计不断演变,纳入了外移的概念,即通过关节盂或肱骨组件,使旋转中心相对于格拉蒙特假体向外移动。通过关节盂组件进行外移旨在减少肩胛切迹,但由于关节盂球头/关节盂界面处应力增加,引发了对早期松动的担忧。通过肱骨组件进行外移的理论依据是,可改善剩余肩袖和三角肌肌肉的力学性能,同时避免关节盂外移固有的问题。虽然目前有限的临床证据支持一种设计优于另一种设计,但多项生物力学研究表明,外移的肱骨和关节盂组件在肩胛切迹发生率和术后外旋方面有所改善。未来的研究应旨在明确一种设计相对于另一种设计的优势,或两种设计的最佳组合。