Suchyta Marissa, Azad Amee, Patel Ashraf A, Khosla Rohit K, Lorenz H Peter, Nazerali Rahim S
From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA.
Ann Plast Surg. 2020 May;84(5S Suppl 4):S307-S310. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002389.
Aesthetic outcomes of unilateral cleft lip repairs have important psychosocial implications for patients who are heavily influenced by social perceptions. Online crowdsourcing offers the unique potential to efficiently recruit large numbers of laypeople to assess public perception. The aim of this study was to use the online crowdsourcing platform Mechanical Turk to compare the postoperative outcomes of Fisher, Millard, and Mohler cleft lip repair techniques.
Two hundred fifty-four participants were recruited through Mechanical Turk to evaluate 29 cropped and deidentified photographs of children, 8 photographs were controls without cleft lips and 21 were children with unilateral cleft lips who had undergone Fisher, Millard, or Mohler repairs (7 in each group). Respondents were asked whether a scar was present, whether they would be personally satisfied with the surgical result and used a Likert scale from 1 to 5 to rate overall appearance, scar severity, and nasal symmetry.
Fewer respondents reported that a scar was present when assessing postoperative photographs of Fisher repairs (70.3 ± 8.6%) compared with Millard (92.0 ± 1.5%) or Mohler (88.8 ± 3.1%) repairs. Average rating of scar severity was also lower for Fisher (1.9) compared with Millard (2.6) or Mohler (2.6) repairs. Average ratings of nose symmetry, general appearance, and satisfaction with operative result were not statistically significantly different between the repair groups.
This study demonstrates the potential of online crowdsourcing to assess public perception of plastic surgery outcomes. The Mechanical Turk platform offers a reduction in selection bias, ease of study design, and enhanced efficiency of large-scale participant recruitment. Results indicate that the Fisher repair led to the most favored aesthetic outcomes compared with the Millard and Mohler techniques, particularly with regard to scar severity. Crowdsourcing is a powerful tool to assess layperson perception of plastic surgery outcomes and can be used to better guide surgical decision-making.
单侧唇裂修复的美学效果对受社会观念严重影响的患者具有重要的心理社会意义。在线众包提供了有效招募大量非专业人士来评估公众认知的独特潜力。本研究的目的是使用在线众包平台亚马逊土耳其机器人(Mechanical Turk)比较费舍尔(Fisher)、米勒德(Millard)和莫勒(Mohler)唇裂修复技术的术后效果。
通过亚马逊土耳其机器人招募了254名参与者,以评估29张裁剪并去除身份信息的儿童照片,其中8张照片为无唇裂的对照,21张是接受费舍尔、米勒德或莫勒修复手术的单侧唇裂儿童(每组7名)。受访者被问及是否存在疤痕,他们个人是否会对手术结果满意,并使用1至5的李克特量表对整体外观、疤痕严重程度和鼻对称性进行评分。
与评估米勒德(92.0 ± 1.5%)或莫勒(88.8 ± 3.1%)修复术后照片相比,在评估费舍尔修复术后照片时,报告存在疤痕的受访者较少(70.3 ± 8.6%)。费舍尔修复术的疤痕严重程度平均评分(1.9)也低于米勒德(2.6)或莫勒(2.6)修复术。修复组之间鼻对称性、总体外观和手术结果满意度的平均评分在统计学上无显著差异。
本研究证明了在线众包在评估公众对整形手术效果认知方面的潜力。亚马逊土耳其机器人平台减少了选择偏差,便于研究设计,并提高了大规模参与者招募的效率。结果表明,与米勒德和莫勒技术相比,费舍尔修复术产生了最受青睐的美学效果,尤其是在疤痕严重程度方面。众包是评估非专业人士对整形手术效果认知的有力工具,可用于更好地指导手术决策。