Center for Pelvic and Women's Health, Marathon Physical Therapy and Sports Medicine, LLC, Norton, MA.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 May 1;27(5):315-321. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000849.
The aim of the study was to evaluate a short course of postpartum pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) on symptoms and quality of life after obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (OASIS).
This was a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Adult women were eligible if they had a vaginal delivery complicated by OASIS and did not have a prior vaginal delivery after 24 weeks' gestation. Participants were randomized to standard care plus PFPT or standard care alone. The primary outcome was change in the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) at 12 weeks postpartum. Secondary outcomes included other validated questionnaires assessing pelvic floor symptoms and bother.
We approached 89 eligible women; 50 were enrolled and randomized. We excluded 6 participants in the PFPT group and 1 in the standard care group who withdrew before study initiation or did not provide baseline data at 2 weeks postpartum. Thus, we analyzed 19 in the PFPT group and 24 in the standard care group. The groups were similar with regard to most baseline characteristics.The PFPT group reported significant improvement in pelvic floor symptoms and bother compared with the standard care group, reflected by a decrease of 29.2 (interquartile range = -58.3 to -4.2) compared with 0.0 (interquartile range = -14.6 to 20.8) on the PFDI-20 from 2 to 12 weeks postpartum (P = 0.002). Significant differences also were observed for all PFDI-20 subscales (all P ≤ 0.02).
At 12 weeks postpartum, the PFPT group reported a significant improvement in pelvic floor symptoms and bother compared with the standard care group.
本研究旨在评估产后盆底物理治疗(PFPT)短期疗程对产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASIS)后症状和生活质量的影响。
这是一项多中心、随机对照试验。符合条件的成年女性为经阴道分娩合并 OASIS 且在 24 孕周后无既往阴道分娩史的患者。参与者被随机分配至标准护理加 PFPT 组或标准护理组。主要结局为产后 12 周时 Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory(PFDI-20)的变化。次要结局包括其他评估盆底症状和困扰的经过验证的问卷。
我们共纳入了 89 名符合条件的女性,其中 50 名入组并被随机分组。我们排除了 PFPT 组的 6 名参与者和标准护理组的 1 名参与者,这些参与者在研究开始前退出或在产后 2 周未提供基线数据。因此,我们分析了 PFPT 组的 19 名和标准护理组的 24 名参与者。两组在大多数基线特征方面相似。与标准护理组相比,PFPT 组报告的盆底症状和困扰明显改善,产后 2 至 12 周时,PFDI-20 评分分别下降 29.2(四分位距= -58.3 至 -4.2)和 0.0(四分位距= -14.6 至 20.8),差异具有统计学意义(P=0.002)。PFDI-20 的所有子量表也均存在显著差异(均 P≤0.02)。
产后 12 周时,PFPT 组报告的盆底症状和困扰较标准护理组显著改善。