From the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital.
UPMC Rehabilitation Institute, Pittsburgh, PA.
Urogynecology (Phila). 2024 Mar 1;30(3):363-368. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001492. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
Limited data describe attendance to pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) in a postpartum patient population.
The objective was describe attendance to PFPT in a cohort of postpartum women at high-risk of pelvic floor concerns. We secondarily compared attendance between patients with and without evaluation in a postpartum pelvic floor healing clinic (PPFHC).
This was a retrospective cohort study of 2 convenience samples from an academic hospital. The PPFHC cohort comprised all postpartum vaginal delivery patients evaluated in the PPFHC from July 2021 to July 2022. The historical pre-PPFHC cohort comprised patients with third/fourth-degree obstetrical lacerations from December 2019 to January 2021. We abstracted attendance to PFPT, number of visits, Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20) scores, Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ) scores, and discharge status.
Our cohort contained 464 patients, 195 (42.0%) from pre-PPFHC and 269 (58.0%) from PPFHC. Among all patients 302 (65.1%) were referred to PFPT and 170 (56.3%) attended at least 1 visit, 82 (48.2%) were discharged from PFPT with goals met, and the median number of visits was 6 (3-10). The majority of patients (97.0%, n = 261) seen in the PPFHC were referred to PFPT, compared with 22.0% (n = 41) of pre-PPFHC patients (P < 0.01). More patients in the pre-PPFHC cohort attended PFPT than in those the PPFHC cohort (75.6% vs 53.5%, P ≤ 0.01). Most patients exhibited improved PFDI and PFIQ scores after PFPT (n = 88, 80.0%, and n = 89, 81.7% respectively).
Patients attending postpartum PFPT demonstrated high therapy completion rates. A dedicated PPFHC had more referrals, however, lower PFPT attendance rates, when compared with a historical cohort.
关于产后女性盆底物理治疗(PFPT)就诊情况的数据有限。
本研究旨在描述高危盆底问题的产后女性盆底物理治疗就诊情况,并比较产后盆底康复门诊(PPFHC)评估与未评估患者的就诊情况。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象来自于一家学术医院的两个便利样本。PPFHC 队列包括 2021 年 7 月至 2022 年 7 月在 PPFHC 评估的所有阴道分娩产后患者。历史的 PPFHC 前队列包括 2019 年 12 月至 2021 年 1 月的第三/四级产科裂伤患者。我们提取了 PFPT 就诊、就诊次数、盆底窘迫量表 20 项(PFDI-20)评分、盆底功能障碍问卷 12 项(PFIQ-12)评分和出院情况。
我们的队列共包含 464 例患者,其中 195 例(42.0%)来自 PPFHC 前队列,269 例(58.0%)来自 PPFHC 队列。所有患者中,302 例(65.1%)被转介至 PFPT,170 例(56.3%)至少就诊 1 次,82 例(48.2%)在满足治疗目标后结束 PFPT 治疗,就诊中位数为 6 次(3-10 次)。与 PPFHC 前队列的 22.0%(n=41)相比,PPFHC 中就诊的患者(97.0%,n=261)更倾向于被转介至 PFPT(P<0.01)。与 PPFHC 队列相比,更多的 PPFHC 前队列患者接受了 PFPT(75.6% vs 53.5%,P≤0.01)。PFPT 治疗后,大多数患者的 PFDI 和 PFIQ 评分均有所改善(分别有 88 例患者[n=88,80.0%]和 89 例患者[n=89,81.7%])。
接受产后盆底物理治疗的患者表现出较高的治疗完成率。与历史队列相比,专门的 PPFHC 虽然有更多的转诊,但 PFPT 就诊率较低。