Climate Change Institute, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469;
Anthropology Department, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Apr 14;117(15):8287-8294. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1914154117.
Understanding the causes and consequences of previous climate changes is essential for testing present-day climate models and projections. Archaeological sites are paleoenvironmental archives containing unique ecological baselines with data on paleoclimate transformations at a human timescale. Anthropogenic and nonanthropogenic forces have destroyed many sites, and others are under immediate threat. In the face of this loss, previously excavated collections from these sites-referred to as legacy collections-offer a source of climate and other paleoenvironmental information that may no longer exist elsewhere. Here, we 1) review obstacles to systematically using data from legacy archaeological collections, such as inconsistent or unreported field methods, inadequate records, unsatisfactory curation, and insufficient public knowledge of relevant collections; 2) suggest best practices for integrating archaeological data into climate and environmental research; and 3) summarize several studies to demonstrate the benefits and challenges of using legacy collections as archives of local and regional environmental proxies. Data from archaeological legacy collections contribute regional ecological baselines as well as serve to correct shifting baselines. They also enable regional climate reconstructions at various timescales and corroborate or refine radiocarbon dates. Such uses of legacy collections raise ethical concerns regarding ownership of and responsibility for cultural resources and highlight the importance of Indigenous involvement in planning and executing fieldwork and stewardship of cultural heritage. Finally, we discuss methodologies, practices, and policies pertaining to archaeological legacy collections and support calls for discipline-wide shifts in collections management to ensure their long-term utility in multidisciplinary research and public engagement.
了解先前气候变化的原因和后果对于检验当今气候模型和预测至关重要。考古遗址是古环境档案,其中包含独特的生态基线数据,记录了人类时间尺度上的古气候变化。人为和非人为因素已经破坏了许多遗址,而其他遗址则面临直接威胁。面对这种损失,以前从这些遗址挖掘出来的藏品——称为遗产藏品——提供了气候和其他古环境信息的来源,这些信息在其他地方可能已经不复存在。在这里,我们 1)回顾了系统使用遗产考古藏品数据所面临的障碍,例如不一致或未报告的野外方法、不充分的记录、不令人满意的保管以及公众对相关藏品的了解不足;2)提出了将考古数据纳入气候和环境研究的最佳实践;3)总结了几项研究,以展示利用遗产藏品作为本地和区域环境替代物档案的益处和挑战。考古遗产藏品的数据不仅提供了区域生态基线,还有助于纠正基线偏移。它们还使我们能够在不同时间尺度上进行区域气候重建,并证实或修正放射性碳测年数据。对遗产藏品的这种利用引发了关于文化资源所有权和责任的伦理问题,并强调了土著人参与规划和执行实地工作以及文化遗产管理的重要性。最后,我们讨论了与考古遗产藏品相关的方法、实践和政策,并支持呼吁在整个学科范围内转变藏品管理方式,以确保它们在多学科研究和公众参与方面的长期效用。