Barrett James H
McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Trinity Centre for Environmental Humanities, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
J Fish Biol. 2019 Jun;94(6):1033-1044. doi: 10.1111/jfb.13929. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
This paper explores the past and potential contribution of archaeology to marine historical ecology. The primary focus is European fishing of marine and diadromous taxa, with global comparisons highlighting the wider applicability of archaeological approaches. The review illustrates how study of excavated fish bones, otoliths and shells can inform our understanding of: (a) changes in biogeography, including the previous distribution of lost species; (b) long-term fluctuations in the aquatic environment, including climate change; (c) the intensity of exploitation and other anthropogenic effects; (d) trade, commodification and globalisation. These issues are also relevant to inform fisheries conservation and management targets. Equally important, the long (pre)history of European fishing raises awareness of our ecological heritage debt, owed for centuries of wealth, sustenance and well-being, and for which we share collective responsibility. This debt represents both a loss and a reason for optimism, insofar as it is a reservoir of potential to be filled by careful stewardship of our rivers, lakes, seas and oceans.
本文探讨了考古学对海洋历史生态学的过往贡献及潜在贡献。主要关注点是欧洲对海洋和洄游类生物的捕捞,并通过全球比较突出考古方法的更广泛适用性。该综述阐述了对发掘出的鱼骨、耳石和贝壳的研究如何增进我们对以下方面的理解:(a)生物地理学的变化,包括已灭绝物种的先前分布;(b)水生环境的长期波动,包括气候变化;(c)开发强度及其他人为影响;(d)贸易、商品化和全球化。这些问题对于确定渔业保护和管理目标也具有参考价值。同样重要的是,欧洲渔业悠久的(前)历史提高了人们对我们生态遗产债务的认识,这笔债务源于数世纪以来的财富、生计和福祉,我们对此负有共同责任。这笔债务既代表着一种损失,也代表着乐观的理由,因为它是一个潜力宝库,可通过对我们的河流、湖泊、海洋进行精心管理来加以充实。