Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts;
Division of Population Sciences and.
Pediatrics. 2020 May;145(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-3552. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
More than 80% of children with cancer become long-term survivors, yet most survivors experience late effects of treatment. Little is known about how parents and physicians consider late-effects risks against a potential survival benefit when making treatment decisions.
We used a discrete choice experiment to assess the importance of late effects on treatment decision-making and acceptable trade-offs between late-effects risks and survival benefit. We surveyed 95 parents of children with cancer and 41 physicians at Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center to assess preferences for 5 late effects of treatment: neurocognitive impairment, infertility, cardiac toxicity, second malignancies, and impaired growth and development.
Each late effect had a statistically significant association with treatment choice, as did survival benefit ( < .001). Avoidance of severe cognitive impairment was the most important treatment consideration to parents and physicians. Parents also valued cure and decreased risk of second malignancies; physician decision-making was driven by avoidance of second malignancies and infertility. Both parents and physicians accepted a high risk of infertility (parents, a 137% increased risk; physicians, an 80% increased risk) in exchange for a 10% greater chance of cure.
Avoidance of severe neurocognitive impairment was the predominant driver of parent and physician treatment preferences, even over an increased chance of cure. This highlights the importance of exploring parental late-effects priorities when discussing treatment options.
超过 80%的癌症患儿成为长期幸存者,但大多数幸存者都经历治疗的晚期副作用。在做出治疗决策时,父母和医生如何权衡潜在的生存获益与晚期副作用风险,这方面的了解甚少。
我们采用离散选择实验来评估晚期效应在治疗决策中的重要性,以及晚期效应风险与生存获益之间可接受的权衡。我们调查了达纳-法伯/波士顿儿童癌症和血液疾病中心的 95 名癌症患儿的父母和 41 名医生,以评估他们对 5 种治疗晚期效应的偏好:认知功能障碍、不孕、心脏毒性、第二肿瘤和生长发育受损。
每种晚期效应都与治疗选择具有统计学显著关联,生存获益也是如此(<.001)。避免严重认知障碍是父母和医生最看重的治疗考虑因素。父母还重视治愈和降低第二肿瘤风险;医生的决策则受到避免第二肿瘤和不孕的驱动。父母和医生都接受了高不孕风险(父母为 137%的风险增加;医生为 80%的风险增加),以换取治愈机会增加 10%。
避免严重的认知功能障碍是父母和医生治疗偏好的主要驱动因素,甚至超过了治愈机会的增加。这凸显了在讨论治疗方案时探索父母对晚期效应优先事项的重要性。