• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Decentralization and collaborative disaster governance: Evidence from South Korea.权力下放与协作性灾害治理:来自韩国的证据
Habitat Int. 2016 Mar;52:50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.08.027. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
2
The Dynamics of Cross-Sector Collaboration in Centralized Disaster Governance: A Network Study of Interorganizational Collaborations during the MERS Epidemic in South Korea.集中式灾害治理中的跨部门合作动态:韩国中东呼吸综合征疫情期间组织间合作的网络研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 21;19(1):18. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010018.
3
Decentralization can help reduce deforestation when user groups engage with local government.当用户群体与地方政府合作时,权力下放有助于减少森林砍伐。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Dec 27;113(52):14958-14963. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1610650114. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
4
Governing decentralization in health care under tough budget constraint: what can we learn from the Italian experience?在严峻的预算约束下管理医疗保健的权力下放:我们可以从意大利的经验中学到什么?
Health Policy. 2009 May;90(2-3):303-12. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.10.012. Epub 2008 Dec 5.
5
Dealing with wicked problems in socio-ecological systems affected by industrial disasters: A framework for collaborative and adaptive governance.应对受工业灾害影响的社会-生态系统中的棘手问题:协同和适应性治理框架。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Dec 1;694:133700. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133700. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
6
Risk, vulnerability, and pragmatic inevitability: the conflict-disaster nexus and urban governance in Johannesburg, South Africa.风险、脆弱性和实用必然性:冲突-灾害关联与南非约翰内斯堡的城市治理。
Disasters. 2022 Jan;46(1):271-295. doi: 10.1111/disa.12461. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
7
Does Decentralization Improve Health System Performance and Outcomes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries? A Systematic Review of Evidence From Quantitative Studies.去中心化是否能提高中低收入国家的卫生系统绩效和结果?来自定量研究的证据的系统评价。
Milbank Q. 2018 Jun;96(2):323-368. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12327.
8
Disaster Governance for Community Resilience in Coastal Towns: Chilean Case Studies.沿海城镇社区抗灾能力的灾害治理:智利案例研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Sep 14;14(9):1063. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14091063.
9
Decentralization, national context and environmental policy performance: a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis.权力下放、国家背景与环境政策绩效:模糊集定性比较分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Oct;25(28):28471-28488. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2846-9. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
10
Key Factors and Coupling Relationships of Collaborative Governance for Disaster Prevention in China's Coastal Cities.中国沿海城市防灾协同治理的关键因素与耦合关系。
Risk Anal. 2021 Jun;41(6):895-910. doi: 10.1111/risa.13586. Epub 2020 Sep 7.

引用本文的文献

1
[Collaborative Disaster Governance Recognized by Nurses during a Pandemic].[大流行期间护士认可的协作式灾害治理]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2021 Dec;51(6):703-719. doi: 10.4040/jkan.21163.
2
The Dynamics of Cross-Sector Collaboration in Centralized Disaster Governance: A Network Study of Interorganizational Collaborations during the MERS Epidemic in South Korea.集中式灾害治理中的跨部门合作动态:韩国中东呼吸综合征疫情期间组织间合作的网络研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 21;19(1):18. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010018.
3
Haiti and the politics of governance and community responses to Hurricane Matthew.海地与治理政治及社区对飓风马修的应对措施
Disaster Health. 2016 Nov 22;3(4):151-161. doi: 10.1080/21665044.2016.1263539. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Post-tsunami recovery and reconstruction: governance issues and implications of the Great East Japan Earthquake.海啸后的恢复与重建:特大地震对日本东部地区的治理问题及影响
Disasters. 2014 Jul;38 Suppl 2:S157-78. doi: 10.1111/disa.12068.
2
Local-level governance of risk and resilience in Nepal.尼泊尔的风险和弹性的地方治理。
Disasters. 2013 Jul;37(3):442-67. doi: 10.1111/disa.12006. Epub 2013 Apr 19.
3
Reducing hazard vulnerability: towards a common approach between disaster risk reduction and climate adaptation.降低灾害脆弱性:迈向减少灾害风险与气候适应之间的共同方法。
Disasters. 2006 Mar;30(1):39-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00305.x.

权力下放与协作性灾害治理:来自韩国的证据

Decentralization and collaborative disaster governance: Evidence from South Korea.

作者信息

Bae Yooil, Joo Yu-Min, Won Soh-Yeon

机构信息

School of Social Sciences, Singapore Management University, 90 Stamford Road, #04-96, 178903, Singapore.

Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, 469B Bukit Timah Road #02-06, Level 2, Li Ka Shing Building, 259771, Singapore.

出版信息

Habitat Int. 2016 Mar;52:50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.08.027. Epub 2015 Aug 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.08.027
PMID:32287705
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7132686/
Abstract

Decentralized disaster governance has been gaining much attention with the rising global urbanization rate and the complex nature of the disasters occurring in densely urbanized areas today. This paper studies the case of South Korea, a highly urbanized country with relatively recent decentralization reforms, in order to analyze the evolution of its disaster management system and to draw out implications from its experience. Specifically, it traces the national-level institutional changes in its disaster management, and then closely examines a hydrofluoric gas leakage in the industrial city of Gumi. The finding is that South Korea simultaneously carried out both centralization and decentralization of disaster management, which are not contradictory but rather complementary. Nevertheless, while the country successfully set up an integrated and comprehensive national-level management system, from which disaster governance can successfully be decentralized to localities, it still requires much more developed and consolidated multilevel (vertical) and broader (horizontal) collaboration, which are the preconditions for decentralized disaster governance.

摘要

随着全球城市化率的不断提高以及当今人口密集的城市化地区灾害的复杂性,分散式灾害治理日益受到关注。本文以韩国为例进行研究,韩国是一个高度城市化且近期进行了分权改革的国家,旨在分析其灾害管理体系的演变并从其经验中得出启示。具体而言,它追溯了韩国灾害管理在国家层面的制度变化,然后仔细研究了工业城市龟尾发生的氢氟酸气体泄漏事件。研究结果表明,韩国在灾害管理方面同时进行了集权和分权,这两者并非相互矛盾,而是相辅相成的。尽管如此,该国虽成功建立了一个综合全面的国家层面管理体系,灾害治理也能成功下放至地方,但仍需要更为发达和巩固的多层次(纵向)和更广泛(横向)合作,而这是分散式灾害治理的前提条件。