McFarland Richard, Verthelyi Daniela, Casey Warren, Arciniega Juan, Isbrucker Richard, Schmitt Michael, Finn Theresa, Descamps Johan, Horiuchi Yoshinobu, Sesardic Dorothea, Stickings Paul, Johnson Nelson W, Lipscomb Elizabeth, Allen David
United States Food and Drug Administration- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
United States Food and Drug Administration- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Procedia Vaccinol. 2011;5:16-32. doi: 10.1016/j.provac.2011.10.002. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
NICEATM and ICCVAM convened an international workshop to review the state of the science of human and veterinary vaccine potency and safety testing methods, and to identify opportunities to advance new and improved methods that can further reduce, refine, and replace animal use. This report addresses methods and strategies identified by workshop participants for replacement of animals used for potency testing of human vaccines. Vaccines considered to have the highest priority for future efforts were (1) vaccines for which antigen quantification methods are already developed but not validated, (2) vaccines/components that require the largest number of animals, (3) vaccines that require an in vivo challenge test, and (4) vaccines with in vivo tests that are highly variable and cause a significant number of invalid tests. Vaccine potency tests identified as the highest priorities for replacement were those for diphtheria and tetanus, pertussis (whole cell and acellular), rabies, anthrax, polio vaccine (inactivated) and complex combination vaccines based on DT or DTwP/aP. Research into understanding the precise mechanism of protection afforded by vaccines and the identification of clinically relevant immunological markers are needed to facilitate the successful implementation of in vitro testing alternatives. This report also identifies several priority human vaccines and associated research objectives that are necessary to successfully implement in vitro vaccine potency testing alternatives.
美国国立毒理学项目中替代方法和动物管理中心(NICEATM)与美国国立卫生研究院实验动物管理与使用评估委员会(ICCVAM)召开了一次国际研讨会,以审查人类和兽用疫苗效力及安全性检测方法的科学现状,并确定推进新的和改进方法的机会,这些方法可进一步减少、优化和替代动物使用。本报告阐述了研讨会参与者确定的替代用于人类疫苗效力测试的动物的方法和策略。未来工作中被认为具有最高优先级的疫苗包括:(1)已开发但未经验证抗原定量方法的疫苗;(2)需要使用动物数量最多的疫苗/成分;(3)需要进行体内攻毒试验的疫苗;(4)体内试验高度可变且导致大量无效试验的疫苗。被确定为替代最高优先级的疫苗效力测试是白喉和破伤风、百日咳(全细胞和无细胞)、狂犬病、炭疽、脊髓灰质炎疫苗(灭活)以及基于白喉类毒素或白百破/无细胞百白破的复合联合疫苗的效力测试。需要开展研究以了解疫苗提供保护的确切机制,并确定临床相关的免疫标志物,以促进体外测试替代方法的成功实施。本报告还确定了几种优先考虑的人类疫苗以及成功实施体外疫苗效力测试替代方法所需的相关研究目标。