Carlo Andrew D, Drake Lauren, Ratzliff Anna D H, Chang Denise, Unützer Jürgen
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle (Carlo, Ratzliff, Chang, Unützer); Department of Population Health Management, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle (Drake). Benjamin G. Druss, M.D., M.P.H., and Gail Daumit, M.D., M.H.S., are editors of this column.
Psychiatr Serv. 2020 Sep 1;71(9):972-974. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900581. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
Novel Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes specific to the collaborative care model (CoCM) offer advantages over traditional billing options, but their uptake may require considerable billing and clinical workflow adjustments. This column presents a case study addressing the challenges of using these codes within the University of Washington Neighborhood Clinics (UWNC), an academically affiliated primary care clinic system in western Washington State. The UWNC experience thus far demonstrates that CoCM CPT codes can successfully be used in a large academic primary care system to help move this evidence-based service model toward financial sustainability.
特定于协作护理模式(CoCM)的新型现行程序编码(CPT)比传统计费选项具有优势,但其采用可能需要对计费和临床工作流程进行相当大的调整。本专栏呈现了一个案例研究,该研究解决了在华盛顿大学社区诊所(UWNC)使用这些编码所面临的挑战,UWNC是华盛顿州西部一家隶属于学术机构的初级保健诊所系统。UWNC迄今为止的经验表明,CoCM CPT编码能够成功应用于大型学术初级保健系统,以帮助推动这种基于证据的服务模式实现财务可持续性。