• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在联邦合格健康中心中检查精神科协作护理和行为健康整合代码的使用:一项混合方法研究。

Examining the use of psychiatric collaborative care and behavioral health integration codes at federally qualified health centers: A mixed-methods study.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

School of Social Work, University of Pittsburgh.

出版信息

Fam Syst Health. 2023 Dec;41(4):527-536. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000827. Epub 2023 Sep 28.

DOI:10.1037/fsh0000827
PMID:37768626
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite evidence to support the integration of behavioral health and physical health care, the adoption of Integrated Behavioral Health (IBH) has been stymied by a lack of reliable and sustainable financing mechanisms. This study aimed to provide information on the use of Psychiatric Collaborative Care Model (CoCM) and behavioral health integration (BHI) codes and the implementation of IBH in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs).

METHOD

This cross-sectional, mixed-methods study involved an electronic survey of administrators and follow-up qualitative interviews from a subset of survey respondents. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive analysis and thematic coding was used to analyze qualitative data to identify salient themes.

RESULTS

Administrators ( = 52) from 11 states completed the survey. Use of CoCM (13%) or BHI codes (17.4%) was low. Most administrators were not aware that CoCM (72%) or BHI codes (70%) existed. Qualitative interviews ( = 9) described barriers that further complicate IBH and code use like workforce shortages and insufficient reimbursement for the cost to deliver CoCM services.

DISCUSSION

Although FQHCs are working to meet the needs of the communities they serve, a lack of billing clarity and awareness and workforce issues hinder the adoption of the CoCM. FQHCs face many demands to provide care to safety net populations, yet are not fully equipped with the resources, workflows, staffing, and payment structures to support CoCM/BHI billing. Increased financial and logistical support to build practice infrastructure is needed to reduce the administrative complexity and inadequate reimbursement mechanisms that currently hinder the implementation of the CoCM and integrated care delivery. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

简介

尽管有证据支持将行为健康和身体健康护理相结合,但由于缺乏可靠和可持续的融资机制,综合行为健康(IBH)的采用一直受到阻碍。本研究旨在提供有关在合格的联邦健康中心(FQHC)中使用精神病协作护理模式(CoCM)和行为健康整合(BHI)代码以及实施 IBH 的信息。

方法

这项横断面混合方法研究涉及对管理人员进行电子调查,并对调查受访者的一部分进行后续定性访谈。使用描述性分析对定量数据进行分析,并使用主题编码对定性数据进行分析,以确定突出的主题。

结果

来自 11 个州的 11 位管理员完成了调查。CoCM(13%)或 BHI 代码(17.4%)的使用率较低。大多数管理员不知道 CoCM(72%)或 BHI 代码(70%)的存在。定性访谈(n=9)描述了进一步使 IBH 和代码使用复杂化的障碍,例如劳动力短缺和提供 CoCM 服务的成本报销不足。

讨论

尽管 FQHC 正在努力满足其服务社区的需求,但计费不明确和缺乏意识以及劳动力问题阻碍了 CoCM 的采用。FQHC 面临着为保障人群提供护理的诸多需求,但他们没有完全配备提供 CoCM/BHI 计费所需的资源、工作流程、人员配备和支付结构。需要增加财务和后勤支持来建立实践基础设施,以减少当前阻碍 CoCM 和综合护理实施的行政复杂性和不足的报销机制。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2024 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Examining the use of psychiatric collaborative care and behavioral health integration codes at federally qualified health centers: A mixed-methods study.在联邦合格健康中心中检查精神科协作护理和行为健康整合代码的使用:一项混合方法研究。
Fam Syst Health. 2023 Dec;41(4):527-536. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000827. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
2
Early Health System Experiences with Collaborative Care (CoCM) Billing Codes: a Qualitative Study of Leadership and Support Staff.早期医疗体系中合作式照护(CoCM)计费代码的应用经验:对领导层和支持人员的定性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Oct;34(10):2150-2158. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05195-0. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
3
Provision of Collaborative Care Model and General Behavioral Health Integration Services in Medicare.医疗保险中协作式护理模式和一般行为健康整合服务的提供。
Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Jul 1;72(7):822-825. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000265. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
4
Barriers and facilitators to collaborative care implementation within the New York State Collaborative Care Medicaid Program.纽约州协同照护医疗补助计划中协同照护实施的障碍与促进因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 24;24(1):505. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10909-0.
5
Federally Qualified Health Centers Use of Telehealth to Deliver Integrated Behavioral Health Care During COVID-19.联邦合格医疗中心在新冠疫情期间利用远程医疗提供综合行为健康护理
Community Ment Health J. 2024 Feb;60(2):215-223. doi: 10.1007/s10597-022-01070-1. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
6
Strategies for Implementing Integrated Behavioral Health into Health Centers.将综合行为健康纳入健康中心的策略。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2025 Feb 20;37(5):833-846. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230417R1.
7
Experiences of Telehealth Reimbursement Policies in Federally Qualified Health Centers.联邦合格健康中心的远程医疗报销政策经验
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2459554. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.59554.
8
Behavioral Health Integration into Primary Care: a Microsimulation of Financial Implications for Practices.行为健康融入初级保健:对实践财务影响的微观模拟。
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Dec;32(12):1330-1341. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4177-9.
9
Leveraging an implementation science partnership network to understand how Federally Qualified Health Centers operationalize and address health equity.利用实施科学伙伴关系网络了解联邦合格健康中心如何实施和解决公平问题。
Transl Behav Med. 2024 Jan 11;14(1):23-33. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad046.
10
Making It to Sustainability: Evaluating Billing Strategies for Collaborative Care.实现可持续性:评估协作护理的计费策略
Psychiatr Serv. 2023 Nov 1;74(11):1192-1195. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220596. Epub 2023 Mar 20.

引用本文的文献

1
The Importance of Honoring Family Caregiver Burden: Challenges in Mental Health Care Delivery.重视家庭照顾者负担的重要性:心理健康护理提供中的挑战。
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2025 Jun;32(2):193-201. doi: 10.1007/s10880-024-10051-3. Epub 2024 Oct 13.