• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症患者、医生和护士在对不复苏决策中的决策角色的态度上存在差异。

Cancer patients, physicians, and nurses differ in their attitudes toward the decisional role in do-not-resuscitate decision-making.

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 7, DK-2730, Herlev, Denmark.

Survivorship and Inequality in Cancer, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2020 Dec;28(12):6057-6066. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05460-7. Epub 2020 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-020-05460-7
PMID:32291599
Abstract

PURPOSE

Do-not-resuscitate (DNR) decision-making in severely ill patients presents many difficult medical, ethical, and legal challenges. The primary aim of this study was to explore cancer patients' and health care professionals' attitudes regarding DNR decision-making authority and timing of the decision.

METHODS

This study was a questionnaire survey among Danish cancer patients and their attending physicians and nurses in an oncology outpatient setting. Potential differences between patients', physicians', and nurses' answers to the questionnaire were analyzed using Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

Responses from 904 patients, 59 physicians, and 160 nurses were analyzed. The majority in all three groups agreed that DNR decisions should be made in collaboration between physician and patient. However, one-third of the patients answered that the patient alone should make the decision regarding DNR, which contrasts with the physicians' and nurses' attitudes, 0% and 6% pointing to the patient as sole decision-maker, respectively. In case of disagreement between patient and physician, a majority of both patients (66%) and physicians (86%) suggested themselves as the ultimate decision-maker. Additionally, 43% of patients but only 19% of physicians preferred the DNR discussion being brought up early in the course of the disease.

CONCLUSIONS

With regard to the decisional role of patient vs. physician and the timing of the DNR discussion, we found a substantial discrepancy between the attitudes of cancer patients and physicians. This discrepancy calls for a greater awareness and discussion of this sensitive topic among both health care professionals and the public.

摘要

目的

在重病患者中做出不复苏(DNR)决策带来了许多医学、伦理和法律方面的难题。本研究的主要目的是探讨癌症患者和医疗保健专业人员对 DNR 决策权限和决策时机的态度。

方法

本研究采用问卷调查的方式,在肿瘤门诊环境中调查丹麦癌症患者及其主治医生和护士。使用 Fisher 确切检验分析患者、医生和护士对问卷回答的潜在差异。

结果

分析了 904 名患者、59 名医生和 160 名护士的回复。这三组人群中的大多数人都认为 DNR 决策应由医生和患者共同做出。然而,三分之一的患者回答说,应该由患者独自决定 DNR,这与医生和护士的态度形成对比,他们分别有 0%和 6%的人认为患者应该是唯一的决策者。如果患者和医生意见不一致,大多数患者(66%)和医生(86%)都认为自己应该是最终的决策者。此外,43%的患者希望在疾病早期就开始讨论 DNR,而只有 19%的医生希望这样做。

结论

在患者与医生的决策角色以及 DNR 讨论的时机方面,我们发现癌症患者和医生的态度存在很大差异。这种差异呼吁医疗保健专业人员和公众更加关注和讨论这一敏感话题。

相似文献

1
Cancer patients, physicians, and nurses differ in their attitudes toward the decisional role in do-not-resuscitate decision-making.癌症患者、医生和护士在对不复苏决策中的决策角色的态度上存在差异。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Dec;28(12):6057-6066. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05460-7. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
2
Attitudes towards do-not-resuscitate decisions: differences among health professionals in a Portuguese hospital.对不进行心肺复苏决定的态度:葡萄牙一家医院医护人员之间的差异。
Intensive Care Med. 2001 Mar;27(3):555-8. doi: 10.1007/s001340100852.
3
Perspectives on the DNR decision process: A survey of nurses and physicians in hematology and oncology.对 DNR 决策过程的看法:一项血液病学和肿瘤学护士和医师的调查。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 21;13(11):e0206550. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206550. eCollection 2018.
4
Australian nurses' experiences and attitudes in the "Do Not Resuscitate" decision.澳大利亚护士在“不予复苏”决策中的经历与态度。
Res Nurs Health. 1998 Oct;21(5):429-41. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-240x(199810)21:5<429::aid-nur6>3.0.co;2-p.
5
Physicians attitudes toward DNR of terminally ill cancer patients in Taiwan.台湾地区医生对晚期癌症患者“不要复苏”医嘱的态度。
J Nurs Res. 2002 Sep;10(3):161-7. doi: 10.1097/01.jnr.0000347595.66638.1e.
6
Beliefs and attitudes of nurses and physicians about do not resuscitate orders and who should speak to patients and families about them.护士和医生对于“不要复苏”医嘱以及应由谁向患者及其家属传达这些医嘱的看法和态度。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Jun;36(6):1817-22. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31817c79fe.
7
Knowledge, Attitude and Decision-making of Nurses in the Resuscitation Team towards Terminating Resuscitation and Do-not-Resuscitate Order.复苏团队护士对终止复苏和不复苏医嘱的知识、态度和决策。
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2022 Mar;32(2):413-422. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v32i2.22.
8
Dying cancer patients talk about physician and patient roles in DNR decision making.临终癌症患者谈论在 DNR 决策中医生和患者的角色。
Health Expect. 2011 Jun;14(2):147-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00630.x. Epub 2010 Sep 23.
9
Do-not-resuscitate orders--should the patient be informed?“不要复苏”医嘱——是否应告知患者?
J Intern Med. 1997 May;241(5):421-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.1997.138144000.x.
10
The attitudes of neonatal professionals towards end-of-life decision-making for dying infants in Taiwan.台湾地区新生儿专业人员对濒死婴儿生命终末期决策的态度。
J Med Ethics. 2013 Jun;39(6):382-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100428. Epub 2012 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
A survey study of healthcare workers on do not Attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation practice and policy in Ireland.一项关于爱尔兰医护人员对不进行心肺复苏操作及政策的调查研究。
Resusc Plus. 2024 Oct 17;20:100799. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100799. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Further Psychometric Evaluation of the Eight-Item Hospice Philosophy Scale: Results From a National Sample of Interdisciplinary Hospice Clinicians.八项临终关怀理念量表的进一步心理测量评估:来自全国跨学科临终关怀临床医生样本的结果
J Appl Gerontol. 2025 Jan;44(1):70-82. doi: 10.1177/07334648241265183. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
3
Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation decision-making process: scoping review.
不尝试进行心肺复苏的决策过程:范围综述
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2025 Apr 30;15(3):400-410. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004573.
4
Cancer care physicians' attitudes toward do not resuscitate orders during the COVID-19 pandemic.癌症护理医生在新冠疫情期间对“不要复苏”医嘱的态度。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2024 May;15(4):101717. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101717. Epub 2024 Feb 10.
5
Factors affecting do-not-attempt-resuscitation (DNAR) decisions among adult patients in the emergency department of a general tertiary teaching hospital in China: a retrospective observational study.中国一家综合性三级教学医院急诊科成人患者不进行心肺复苏术(DNAR)决策的影响因素:一项回顾性观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 10;13(10):e075714. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075714.
6
Low adherence to legislation regarding Do-Not-Attempt-Cardiopulmonary-Resuscitation orders in a Swedish University Hospital.瑞典一家大学医院对“不要尝试心肺复苏”医嘱相关立法的依从性较低。
Resusc Plus. 2021 Apr 29;6:100128. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100128. eCollection 2021 Jun.
7
Research progress in decision-making aids for breast cancer patients.乳腺癌患者决策辅助工具的研究进展。
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021 Feb 28;46(2):176-182. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2021.190584.