• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

等待时间对高危子宫内膜癌患者肿瘤学结局的影响。

The impact of wait times on oncological outcome in high-risk patients with endometrial cancer.

机构信息

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Gynecologic Oncology Laboratory, Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

J Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug;122(2):306-314. doi: 10.1002/jso.25929. Epub 2020 Apr 14.

DOI:10.1002/jso.25929
PMID:32291783
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of surgical wait times on outcome of patients with grade 3 endometrial cancer.

METHODS

All consecutive patients surgically treated for grade 3 endometrial cancer between 2007 and 2015 were included. Patients were divided into two groups based on the time interval between endometrial biopsy and surgery: wait time from biopsy to surgery ≤12 weeks (84 days) vs more than 12 weeks. Survival analyses were conducted using log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

A total of 136 patients with grade 3 endometrial cancer were followed for a median of 5.6 years. Fifty-one women (37.5%) waited more than 12 weeks for surgery. Prolonged surgical wait times were not associated with advanced stage at surgery, positive lymph nodes, increased lymphovascular space invasion, and tumor size (P = .8, P = 1.0, P = .2, P = .9, respectively). In multivariable analysis adjusted for clinical and pathological factors, wait times did not significantly affect disease-specific survival (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6-2.5, P = .6), overall survival (HR: 1.1, 95% CI, 0.6-2.1, P = .7), or progression-free survival (HR: 0.9, 95% CI, 0.5-1.7, P = .8).

CONCLUSION

Prolonged surgical wait time for poorly differentiated endometrial cancer seemed to have a limited impact on clinical outcomes compared to biological factors.

摘要

目的

评估手术等待时间对 3 级子宫内膜癌患者结局的影响。

方法

纳入 2007 年至 2015 年间接受手术治疗的 3 级子宫内膜癌连续患者。根据子宫内膜活检与手术之间的时间间隔,将患者分为两组:活检至手术的等待时间≤12 周(84 天)与超过 12 周。使用对数秩检验和 Cox 比例风险模型进行生存分析。

结果

共 136 例 3 级子宫内膜癌患者的中位随访时间为 5.6 年。51 例(37.5%)女性等待手术的时间超过 12 周。手术等待时间延长与手术时分期较晚、淋巴结阳性、淋巴管血管间隙侵犯增加和肿瘤大小无关(P = .8,P = 1.0,P = .2,P = .9)。在调整临床和病理因素的多变量分析中,等待时间并未显著影响疾病特异性生存(调整后的危险比[HR]:1.2,95%置信区间[CI]:0.6-2.5,P = .6)、总生存(HR:1.1,95% CI:0.6-2.1,P = .7)或无进展生存(HR:0.9,95% CI:0.5-1.7,P = .8)。

结论

与生物因素相比,分化不良的子宫内膜癌手术等待时间延长似乎对临床结局的影响有限。

相似文献

1
The impact of wait times on oncological outcome in high-risk patients with endometrial cancer.等待时间对高危子宫内膜癌患者肿瘤学结局的影响。
J Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug;122(2):306-314. doi: 10.1002/jso.25929. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
2
Pre-operative wait times in high-grade non-endometrioid endometrial cancer: Do surgical delays impact patient survival?高级别非子宫内膜样子宫内膜癌的术前等待时间:手术延迟是否影响患者生存?
Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Feb;164(2):333-340. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.11.016. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
3
Time interval between endometrial biopsy and surgical staging for type I endometrial cancer: association between tumor characteristics and survival outcome.I型子宫内膜癌子宫内膜活检与手术分期之间的时间间隔:肿瘤特征与生存结局之间的关联
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;125(2):424-433. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000636.
4
Outcomes and relapse patterns of stage IB grade 2 or 3 endometrial cancer treated with adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy.辅助阴道近距离放疗治疗 IIB 期分级 2 或 3 期子宫内膜癌的结果和复发模式。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Jan;30(1):48-55. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000675. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
5
Does surgical platform impact recurrence and survival? A study of utilization of multiport, single-port, and robotic-assisted laparoscopy in endometrial cancer surgery.手术平台是否会影响复发和生存?子宫内膜癌手术中多端口、单端口和机器人辅助腹腔镜应用的研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Sep;221(3):243.e1-243.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.038. Epub 2019 May 7.
6
Clinical significance of surgical staging for obese women with endometrial cancer: a retrospective analysis in a Japanese cohort.肥胖型子宫内膜癌患者行外科分期的临床意义:日本队列的回顾性分析。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2014 Oct;44(10):903-9. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyu106. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
7
Surgical wait time: A new health indicator in women with endometrial cancer.手术等待时间:子宫内膜癌女性的一项新健康指标。
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Jun;141(3):511-515. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.04.014. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
8
The role of multi-modality adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation in women with advanced stage endometrial cancer.多模式辅助化疗和放疗在晚期子宫内膜癌女性患者中的作用。
Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Nov;107(2):285-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.06.014. Epub 2007 Aug 6.
9
Hormone receptor loss in endometrial carcinoma curettage predicts lymph node metastasis and poor outcome in prospective multicentre trial.激素受体丢失在内膜癌刮宫术中预测淋巴结转移和前瞻性多中心试验中的不良预后。
Eur J Cancer. 2013 Nov;49(16):3431-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.06.016. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
10
The impact of age on long-term outcome in patients with endometrial cancer treated with postoperative radiation.年龄对接受术后放疗的子宫内膜癌患者长期预后的影响。
Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Oct;103(1):87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.01.038. Epub 2006 Mar 20.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Treatment Delay on Endometrial and Ovarian Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review.治疗延迟对子宫内膜癌和卵巢癌患者的影响:一项系统综述。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 21;17(13):2076. doi: 10.3390/cancers17132076.
2
Comprehensive Review of Endometrial Cancer: New Molecular and FIGO Classification and Recent Treatment Changes.子宫内膜癌综合综述:新的分子和国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分类以及近期治疗变化
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 19;14(4):1385. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041385.
3
The Impact of Waiting Time-to-Surgery on Survival in Endometrial Cancer Patients.
等待手术时间对子宫内膜癌患者生存的影响。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 Jan 1;25(1):95-101. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.1.95.
4
Association between time to diagnosis, time to treatment, and ovarian cancer survival in the United States.美国诊断时间、治疗时间与卵巢癌生存之间的关联。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022 Sep 6;32(9):1153-1163. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003696.