Suppr超能文献

增强定性研究结果清晰度和读者可理解性的策略综述。

A Review of Strategies for Enhancing Clarity and Reader Accessibility of Qualitative Research Results.

机构信息

University of Washington School of Pharmacy, Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Jan;84(1):7124. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7124.

Abstract

To characterize elements of the results section of qualitative research reports that make findings more accessible to readers. Two analytical methods were used for this review. First, published reviews and textbooks written by experts outlining how to evaluate qualitative research were retrieved and reviewed to identify common elements that enhance clarity of the results section. In the second analysis, the authors analyzed the results sections of a subset of qualitative studies to identify, from a reader's point of view, aspects that enhanced and detracted from communication of the results. Four elements improve accessibility of the results section for readers of qualitative research reports. Content, the first element, describes what information the reader should look for in the results section. Style of results, the second element, identifies wording choices that improve reader accessibility and understanding. Narrative flow, the third element, describes a results section that flows smoothly and logically. Structural cohesiveness, the final element, outlines effective organization of the results section. While authors take several approaches to the presentation of results in qualitative research reports, some strategies appear to be more common and effective than others. The efficient presentation of results can impact a reader's assessment of the quality and credibility of a study. Identified content and stylistic elements should be considered by authors hoping to make the results of their qualitative research more accessible and comprehensible to readers.

摘要

为了描述定性研究报告结果部分的元素,这些元素可以使读者更容易理解研究结果。本研究采用了两种分析方法。首先,检索并回顾了由专家撰写的关于如何评估定性研究的已发表的综述和教科书,以确定增强结果部分清晰度的常见元素。在第二种分析中,作者分析了一组定性研究的结果部分,从读者的角度出发,确定了增强和削弱研究结果交流的方面。有四个元素可以提高定性研究报告读者对结果部分的理解。内容是第一个元素,描述了读者应该在结果部分中寻找的信息。结果的表述风格是第二个元素,确定了提高读者可理解性的措辞选择。叙述流程是第三个元素,描述了一个流畅且逻辑上合理的结果部分。结构内聚性是最后一个元素,概述了结果部分的有效组织。虽然作者在定性研究报告中采用了几种呈现结果的方法,但有些策略似乎比其他策略更为常见和有效。结果的有效呈现可以影响读者对研究质量和可信度的评估。希望使定性研究结果更易于读者理解的作者应该考虑到所识别的内容和文体元素。

相似文献

6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Reading, writing and systematic review.阅读、写作与系统综述。
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Oct;64(1):104-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04813.x.

本文引用的文献

2
Qualitative Research Methods: A Phenomenological Focus.定性研究方法:以现象学为重点
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2018 Nov/Dec;37(6):302-309. doi: 10.1097/DCC.0000000000000322.
3
Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds?定性研究数据的主题分析:它有听起来那么简单吗?
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018 Jun;10(6):807-815. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019. Epub 2018 Apr 5.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验