Zarei Mohammad, Mahmoudi Alireza, Hadi Abdollah, Riazi-Esfahani Hamid
Retina service, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin Square, South Karegar Street, Tehran, 1336616351 Iran.
Int J Retina Vitreous. 2020 Apr 9;6:7. doi: 10.1186/s40942-020-00210-7. eCollection 2020.
The authors report two cases of the scleral buckles intrusion and erosion that presented many years after primary surgery with vitreous haemorrhage in one of them. Although the erosion/intrusion of a silicone scleral buckle (SB) is rare, it may have serious consequences and optimal management can be challenging. Therefore, this diagnosis should be considered if attributable signs and symptoms including vitreous haemorrhage occurred after scleral buckling. The authors briefly review the literature on clinical presentation and management of the episcleral silicone buckling erosion and intrusion.
Case 1: A 48-year-old woman with a history of scleral buckling for an inferior rhegmatogenous retinal detachment presented with visual loss in her right eye. A vitreous haemorrhage was observed. After Close observation, Partial resolution of haemorrhage revealed an intruded sponge segment in inferior vitreous cavity. Case 2: A 26-year-old man was referred for retinal evaluation. Twenty years earlier, he had undergone lensectomy for bilateral childhood cataract. Ten years ago, he had developed an aphakic RRD in the left eye. The detachment was managed with pars plana deep vitrectomy, endolaser, an encircling silicone band, and silicone oil injection. On examination an eroded band was noted.
Although the erosion/intrusion of a silicone episcleral buckle is rare, it may have serious consequences and optimal management can be challenging. Unnecessarily destructive techniques may predispose the eye to this complication and should be avoided. Patients who have a history of SB need lifelong follow-up and this diagnosis should be considered if attributable signs and symptoms occurred.
作者报告了两例巩膜扣带侵入和侵蚀的病例,其中一例在原发性玻璃体出血手术后多年出现这种情况。尽管硅胶巩膜扣带(SB)的侵蚀/侵入很少见,但可能会产生严重后果,最佳治疗方案颇具挑战性。因此,如果巩膜扣带术后出现包括玻璃体出血在内的相关体征和症状,应考虑这一诊断。作者简要回顾了关于巩膜硅胶扣带侵蚀和侵入的临床表现及治疗的文献。
病例1:一名48岁女性,有下方孔源性视网膜脱离巩膜扣带手术史,右眼视力下降。观察到玻璃体出血。密切观察后,出血部分吸收,显示下方玻璃体腔有一个侵入的海绵段。病例2:一名26岁男性因视网膜评估前来就诊。20年前,他因双侧儿童白内障接受了晶状体切除术。10年前,他左眼发生无晶状体性视网膜脱离。采用玻璃体切除术、眼内激光、环形硅胶带和硅油注射治疗视网膜脱离。检查时发现一条带侵蚀。
尽管硅胶巩膜扣带的侵蚀/侵入很少见,但可能会产生严重后果,最佳治疗方案颇具挑战性。不必要的破坏性技术可能使眼睛易患这种并发症,应避免使用。有巩膜扣带手术史的患者需要终身随访,如果出现相关体征和症状,应考虑这一诊断。