• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用紫杉醇涂层药物洗脱技术改善血液透析通路中心静脉通畅性:有何益处?

Use of Paclitaxel Coated Drug Eluting Technology to Improve Central Vein Patency for Haemodialysis Access Circuits: Any Benefit?

作者信息

Chong Tze Tec, Yap Hao Yun, Tan Chieh Suai, Lee Qingwei Shaun, Chan Sze Ling, Wee Ian Jun Yan, Tang Tjun Yip

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.

Department of Interventional Nephrology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.

出版信息

Vasc Specialist Int. 2020 Mar 31;36(1):21-27. doi: 10.5758/vsi.2020.36.1.21.

DOI:10.5758/vsi.2020.36.1.21
PMID:32292765
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7119145/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Central venous stenosis is a recurring problem affecting dialysis access patency. Increasing evidence suggests that the use of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) improves target lesion primary patency (TLPP) in dialysis access. However, few studies have investigated the use of DCBs specifically in central venous stenosis. Thus, this study presents our initial experience with DCBs in the central vein of a dialysis access circuit.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of all hemodialysis patients who underwent central vein angioplasty with DCB between February 2017 and March 2018 at Singapore General Hospital. We compared the primary patency post DCB angioplasty to the primary patency of the patient's previous plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA).

RESULTS

We observed a 100% anatomic and procedural success rate with no complications. The median follow-up period was 151 days (interquartile range, 85.5-234 days) and no patients were lost to follow-up. The 30- and 90-day TLPPs after DCB were 93.3% and 75.7%, respectively. The mean primary patency in our study group post-DCB during the follow-up period was 164 days (vs. 140 days in the POBA group). However, no statistically significant difference was detected.

CONCLUSION

DCB showed a similar TLPP to that for POBA in treating central venous stenosis with a trend toward a longer re-intervention-free period for DCB. However, there were numerous confounding factors and a well-designed randomized controlled trial is warranted to assess the true utility of DCB in treating central venous stenosis.

摘要

目的

中心静脉狭窄是影响透析通路通畅性的一个反复出现的问题。越来越多的证据表明,使用药物涂层球囊(DCB)可提高透析通路中靶病变的初始通畅率(TLPP)。然而,很少有研究专门探讨DCB在中心静脉狭窄中的应用。因此,本研究介绍了我们在透析通路回路中心静脉使用DCB的初步经验。

材料与方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为2017年2月至2018年3月在新加坡总医院接受DCB中心静脉血管成形术的所有血液透析患者。我们将DCB血管成形术后的初始通畅率与患者之前单纯球囊血管成形术(POBA)的初始通畅率进行了比较。

结果

我们观察到解剖和手术成功率为100%,无并发症。中位随访期为151天(四分位间距,85.5 - 234天),无患者失访。DCB术后30天和90天的TLPP分别为93.3%和75.7%。在随访期间,我们研究组DCB术后的平均初始通畅时间为164天(POBA组为140天)。然而,未检测到统计学上的显著差异。

结论

在治疗中心静脉狭窄方面,DCB的TLPP与POBA相似,且DCB有延长无再次干预期的趋势。然而,存在众多混杂因素,有必要进行一项设计良好的随机对照试验来评估DCB在治疗中心静脉狭窄中的真正效用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c4/7119145/2df8c781e990/VSI-36-021-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c4/7119145/100eea76c1d5/VSI-36-021-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c4/7119145/2df8c781e990/VSI-36-021-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c4/7119145/100eea76c1d5/VSI-36-021-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c4/7119145/2df8c781e990/VSI-36-021-f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Use of Paclitaxel Coated Drug Eluting Technology to Improve Central Vein Patency for Haemodialysis Access Circuits: Any Benefit?使用紫杉醇涂层药物洗脱技术改善血液透析通路中心静脉通畅性:有何益处?
Vasc Specialist Int. 2020 Mar 31;36(1):21-27. doi: 10.5758/vsi.2020.36.1.21.
2
A randomized controlled trial of drug-coated balloon angioplasty in venous anastomotic stenosis of dialysis arteriovenous grafts.药物涂层球囊血管成形术治疗透析动静脉移植物吻合口静脉狭窄的随机对照试验。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Jun;71(6):1994-2003. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.07.090. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
3
Efficacy and Safety of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Dysfunctional Arteriovenous Fistulas: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.紫杉醇涂层球囊血管成形术治疗功能不良动静脉瘘的疗效和安全性:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2021 Jul;78(1):19-27.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.11.022. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
4
Multicenter randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of PASSEO-LUX DCB drug coated balloon compared to plain balloon angioplasty of arteriovenous fistulae for hemodialysis: Two-years results.多中心随机对照试验:评估用于血液透析的动静脉内瘘PASSEO-LUX药物涂层球囊与普通球囊血管成形术相比的有效性:两年结果
J Vasc Access. 2025 Jul;26(4):1337-1347. doi: 10.1177/11297298241272259. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
5
Editor's Choice - Paclitaxel Coated Balloon Angioplasty vs. Plain Balloon Angioplasty for Haemodialysis Arteriovenous Access Stenosis: A Systematic Review and a Time to Event Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.编辑精选 - 紫杉醇涂层球囊血管成形术与普通球囊血管成形术治疗血液透析动静脉内瘘狭窄的比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和时间事件荟萃分析。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Oct;62(4):597-609. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.05.043. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
6
Drug Coated Balloons for Dysfunctional Haemodialysis Venous Access: A Patient Level Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.药物涂层球囊治疗功能不良血液透析静脉通路:随机对照试验的患者水平荟萃分析。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Oct;62(4):610-621. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.06.006. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
7
Systematic review and updated meta-analysis of the use of drug-coated balloon angioplasty versus plain old balloon angioplasty for femoropopliteal arterial disease.药物涂层球囊血管成形术与普通球囊血管成形术治疗股腘动脉疾病的系统评价和更新的荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Sep;70(3):981-995.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.01.080. Epub 2019 May 21.
8
Drug-Coated versus Plain Balloon Angioplasty in Bypass Vein Grafts (the DRECOREST I-Study).药物涂层与普通球囊血管成形术在旁路静脉移植物中的应用(DRECOREST I研究)
Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 Feb;55:36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.04.042. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
9
Paclitaxel drug-coated balloon angioplasty for the treatment of failing arteriovenous fistulas: a single-center experience.紫杉醇药物涂层球囊血管成形术治疗失功动静脉瘘:单中心经验。
Acta Chir Belg. 2020 Apr;120(2):85-91. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2018.1561796. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
10
A systematic review and meta-analysis of drug-coated balloon versus conventional balloon angioplasty for dialysis access stenosis.药物涂层球囊与传统球囊血管成形术治疗透析通路狭窄的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Sep;70(3):970-979.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.01.082.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and Performance of a Cell-Impermeable Endoprosthesis for Hemodialysis Vascular Access Outflow Stenosis: A Brazilian Multicenter Retrospective Study.细胞不可渗透的血液透析血管通路流出道狭窄内支架的安全性和性能:巴西多中心回顾性研究。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024 Aug;47(8):1057-1065. doi: 10.1007/s00270-024-03790-1. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
2
Management of Central Venous Stenoses and Occlusions.中心静脉狭窄和闭塞的处理。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023 Sep;46(9):1182-1191. doi: 10.1007/s00270-023-03461-7. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
3
Drug-eluting balloon (DEB) versus plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) in the treatment of failing dialysis access: A prospective randomized trial.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review and meta-analysis of drug-coated balloon versus conventional balloon angioplasty for dialysis access stenosis.药物涂层球囊与传统球囊血管成形术治疗透析通路狭窄的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Sep;70(3):970-979.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.01.082.
2
Risk of Death Following Application of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons and Stents in the Femoropopliteal Artery of the Leg: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.紫杉醇涂层球囊和支架在下肢股腘动脉中的应用死亡风险:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Dec 18;7(24):e011245. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011245.
3
药物洗脱球囊(DEB)与普通球囊血管成形术(POBA)治疗失败的透析通路:一项前瞻性随机试验。
J Int Med Res. 2022 Mar;50(3):3000605221081662. doi: 10.1177/03000605221081662.
4
Drug-Coated Balloons for the Dysfunctional Vascular Access: An Evidence-Based Road Map to Treatment and the Existing Obstacles.用于功能失调的血管通路的药物涂层球囊:基于证据的治疗路线图及现存障碍
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2022 Feb 18;39(1):56-65. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1742483. eCollection 2022 Feb.
Antiplatelet agents maintain arteriovenous fistula and graft function in patients receiving hemodialysis: A nationwide case-control study.
抗血小板药物可维持接受血液透析患者动静脉瘘和移植物功能:一项全国性病例对照研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 18;13(10):e0206011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206011. eCollection 2018.
4
Prevalence of Central Vein Stenosis in Patients Referred for Vein Mapping.中心静脉狭窄患者在接受静脉映射检查中的患病率。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018 Jul 6;13(7):1063-1068. doi: 10.2215/CJN.14001217. Epub 2018 May 8.
5
Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Early Restenosis of Central Veins in Hemodialysis Patients: A Single Center Initial Experience.紫杉醇涂层球囊血管成形术治疗血液透析患者中心静脉早期再狭窄:单中心初步经验。
Korean J Radiol. 2018 May-Jun;19(3):410-416. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.19.3.410. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
6
Society of Interventional Radiology Reporting Standards for Thoracic Central Vein Obstruction: Endorsed by the American Society of Diagnostic and Interventional Nephrology (ASDIN), British Society of Interventional Radiology (BSIR), Canadian Interventional Radiology Association (CIRA), Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Indian Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (ISVIR), Vascular Access Society of the Americas (VASA), and Vascular Access Society of Britain and Ireland (VASBI).介入放射学会关于胸段中心静脉阻塞的报告标准:得到美国诊断与介入肾脏病学会(ASDIN)、英国介入放射学会(BSIR)、加拿大介入放射学会(CIRA)、心律学会(HRS)、印度血管与介入放射学会(ISVIR)、美洲血管通路学会(VASA)以及英国和爱尔兰血管通路学会(VASBI)的认可。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018 Apr;29(4):454-460.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.12.013. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
7
Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons for the Treatment of Symptomatic Central Venous Stenosis in Dialysis Access: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.用于治疗透析通路中症状性中心静脉狭窄的紫杉醇涂层球囊:一项随机对照试验的结果
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017 Jun;28(6):811-817. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
8
Systematic review of drug eluting balloon angioplasty for arteriovenous haemodialysis access stenosis.药物洗脱球囊血管成形术治疗动静脉血液透析通路狭窄的系统评价
J Vasc Access. 2016 Mar-Apr;17(2):103-10. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000508. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
9
Paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty for symptomatic central vein restenosis in patients with hemodialysis fistulas.紫杉醇涂层球囊血管成形术治疗血液透析动静脉内瘘有症状的中心静脉再狭窄
J Endovasc Ther. 2015 Feb;22(1):74-9. doi: 10.1177/1526602814566907.
10
Drug-eluting versus plain balloon angioplasty for the treatment of failing dialysis access: final results and cost-effectiveness analysis from a prospective randomized controlled trial (NCT01174472).药物洗脱球囊血管成形术与普通球囊血管成形术治疗失败的透析通路:一项前瞻性随机对照试验(NCT01174472)的最终结果及成本效益分析
Eur J Radiol. 2015 Mar;84(3):418-423. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.11.037. Epub 2014 Dec 15.