• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物洗脱球囊(DEB)与普通球囊血管成形术(POBA)治疗失败的透析通路:一项前瞻性随机试验。

Drug-eluting balloon (DEB) versus plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) in the treatment of failing dialysis access: A prospective randomized trial.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.

Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 2022 Mar;50(3):3000605221081662. doi: 10.1177/03000605221081662.

DOI:10.1177/03000605221081662
PMID:35354342
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8978321/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of angioplasty using drug-eluting balloons (DEB) compared with plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) to reduce the rate of restenosis.

METHODS

This prospective, single-centre, single-blinded, 1:1 randomized, clinical trial enrolled patients that had primary or restenotic lesions in native upper extremity arteriovenous (AV) fistulas or at the graft-venous anastomosis. Patients were randomized to angioplasty with a POBA or a DEB. The primary effectiveness endpoints were freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) and functional status of access circuit at 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 42 (28 male, 14 female; age range, 42-83 years) patients were enrolled. Patients were followed for 12 months. No significant differences were detected between the POBA and DEB groups regarding total number of TLR procedures (31 versus 36, respectively), freedom from TLR (3 versus 4, respectively) and functional status of the access circuit at 12 months (14 of 20 patients [70%] versus 17 of 22 patients [77%], respectively).

CONCLUSION

This clinical trial did not demonstrate any significant differences between DEB angioplasty and standard balloon angioplasty when treating dysfunctional haemodialysis access.

摘要

目的

比较药物洗脱球囊(DEB)血管成形术与普通球囊血管成形术(POBA)降低再狭窄率的疗效。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、单中心、单盲、1:1 随机、临床试验,纳入了原发性或复发性上肢动静脉(AV)瘘或移植物-静脉吻合口病变的患者。患者被随机分为 POBA 或 DEB 血管成形术组。主要有效性终点为 12 个月时无靶病变血运重建(TLR)和通路功能状态。

结果

共纳入 42 例(28 例男性,14 例女性;年龄 42-83 岁)患者。患者随访 12 个月。POBA 组和 DEB 组在 TLR 总例数(分别为 31 例和 36 例)、TLR 无事件率(分别为 3 例和 4 例)和 12 个月时通路功能状态方面均无显著差异(20 例患者中有 14 例[70%]和 22 例患者中有 17 例[77%])。

结论

本临床试验未显示 DEB 血管成形术与标准球囊血管成形术治疗功能失调性血液透析通路时存在显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0716/8978321/9a1d6d0faf14/10.1177_03000605221081662-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0716/8978321/ecb811477c45/10.1177_03000605221081662-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0716/8978321/ff2837dbaaa7/10.1177_03000605221081662-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0716/8978321/9a1d6d0faf14/10.1177_03000605221081662-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0716/8978321/ecb811477c45/10.1177_03000605221081662-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0716/8978321/ff2837dbaaa7/10.1177_03000605221081662-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0716/8978321/9a1d6d0faf14/10.1177_03000605221081662-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Drug-eluting balloon (DEB) versus plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) in the treatment of failing dialysis access: A prospective randomized trial.药物洗脱球囊(DEB)与普通球囊血管成形术(POBA)治疗失败的透析通路:一项前瞻性随机试验。
J Int Med Res. 2022 Mar;50(3):3000605221081662. doi: 10.1177/03000605221081662.
2
Drug-eluting versus plain balloon angioplasty for the treatment of failing dialysis access: final results and cost-effectiveness analysis from a prospective randomized controlled trial (NCT01174472).药物洗脱球囊血管成形术与普通球囊血管成形术治疗失败的透析通路:一项前瞻性随机对照试验(NCT01174472)的最终结果及成本效益分析
Eur J Radiol. 2015 Mar;84(3):418-423. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.11.037. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
3
Comparison among drug-eluting balloon, drug-eluting stent, and plain balloon angioplasty for the treatment of in-stent restenosis: a network meta-analysis of 11 randomized, controlled trials.药物洗脱球囊、药物洗脱支架与普通球囊血管成形术治疗支架内再狭窄的比较:11 项随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Mar;8(3):382-394. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.09.023. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
4
Long-Term Outcomes After Treatment With a Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Versus Balloon Angioplasty: Insights From the PEPCAD-DES Study (Treatment of Drug-eluting Stent [DES] In-Stent Restenosis With SeQuent Please Paclitaxel-Coated Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty [PTCA] Catheter).紫杉醇涂层球囊与球囊血管成形术治疗的长期结果:PEPCAD-DES 研究的见解(使用 SeQuent Please 紫杉醇涂层经皮腔内冠状动脉血管成形术 [PTCA] 导管治疗药物洗脱支架 [DES] 支架内再狭窄)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Nov;8(13):1695-700. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.07.023.
5
Ranger™ paclitaxel-coated balloon versus conventional balloon angioplasty for treatment of failing arteriovenous fistulas and grafts in haemodialysis patients: A retrospective cohort study.Ranger™ 紫杉醇涂层球囊与传统球囊血管成形术治疗血液透析患者动静脉瘘和移植物失功:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Vasc Access. 2023 Sep;24(5):1032-1041. doi: 10.1177/11297298211067046. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
6
Drug-eluting balloon versus standard balloon angioplasty for infrapopliteal arterial revascularization in critical limb ischemia: 12-month results from the IN.PACT DEEP randomized trial.药物涂层球囊与标准球囊血管成形术治疗临界肢体缺血的腘动脉血运重建:来自 IN.PACT DEEP 随机试验的 12 个月结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Oct 14;64(15):1568-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.1198.
7
The Randomized Freeway Stent Study: Drug-Eluting Balloons Outperform Standard Balloon Angioplasty for Postdilatation of Nitinol Stents in the SFA and PI Segment.随机高速公路支架研究:药物洗脱球囊在 SFA 和 PI 段中用于后扩张镍钛诺支架时优于标准球囊血管成形术。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2019 Nov;42(11):1513-1521. doi: 10.1007/s00270-019-02309-3. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
8
Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Fistula and Graft Stenoses: Randomized Trial Comparing Drug-eluting Balloon Angioplasty with Conventional Angioplasty.血液透析动静脉瘘和移植物狭窄:比较药物洗脱球囊血管成形术与传统血管成形术的随机试验。
Radiology. 2018 Oct;289(1):238-247. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018170806. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
9
Paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty for symptomatic central vein restenosis in patients with hemodialysis fistulas.紫杉醇涂层球囊血管成形术治疗血液透析动静脉内瘘有症状的中心静脉再狭窄
J Endovasc Ther. 2015 Feb;22(1):74-9. doi: 10.1177/1526602814566907.
10
Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon Versus Standard Balloon Angioplasty in In-Stent Restenosis of the Superficial Femoral and Proximal Popliteal Artery: 1-Year Results of the PACUBA Trial.紫杉醇洗脱球囊与标准球囊血管成形术治疗股浅动脉和腘动脉支架内再狭窄:PACUBA 试验 1 年结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jul 11;9(13):1386-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.04.012.

引用本文的文献

1
Cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula dysfunction and approaches to promote maturation: a vascular perspective.血液透析动静脉内瘘功能障碍的细胞和分子机制及促进其成熟的方法:血管视角
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2025 Jul 1;329(1):H241-H257. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00010.2025. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
2
Efficacy of drug-coated balloon versus uncoated balloon for dysfunctional dialysis access: a systematic review and meta-analysis.药物涂层球囊与未涂层球囊治疗功能不良透析通路的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Exp Nephrol. 2025 Feb 24. doi: 10.1007/s10157-025-02642-7.
3
Drug-coated balloons versus conventional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for treatment-naïve dysfunctional arteriovenous fistulas.: A 10-year single center retrospective study.

本文引用的文献

1
A multicenter randomized controlled trial indicates that paclitaxel-coated balloons provide no benefit for arteriovenous fistulas.一项多中心随机对照试验表明,紫杉醇涂层球囊对动静脉瘘没有益处。
Kidney Int. 2021 Aug;100(2):447-456. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.02.040. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
2
Mortality with Paclitaxel-Coated Devices in Peripheral Artery Disease.紫杉醇涂层器械在外周动脉疾病中的死亡率。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 24;383(26):2538-2546. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2005206. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
3
No Difference in Mid-term and Long-Term Mortality After Vascular Paclitaxel Exposure.
药物涂层球囊与传统经皮腔内血管成形术治疗初治功能不良动静脉瘘:一项 10 年单中心回顾性研究。
Saudi Med J. 2024 Jul;45(7):741-744. doi: 10.15537/smj.2024.45.7.20230852.
4
Comparison of drug-coated balloon angioplasty versus common balloon angioplasty for arteriovenous fistula stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.药物涂层球囊血管成形术与普通球囊血管成形术治疗动静脉瘘狭窄的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2023 Aug;46(8):877-885. doi: 10.1002/clc.24078. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
血管内紫杉醇暴露后中期和长期死亡率无差异。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Apr;72:253-260. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.08.147. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
4
KDOQI 2019 Vascular Access Guidelines: What Is New?KDIGO 2019 血管通路指南:有何新变化?
Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2020 May;27(3):171-176. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2020.02.003.
5
Drug-Coated Balloons for Dysfunctional Dialysis Arteriovenous Fistulas.药物涂层球囊治疗功能不良的血液透析动静脉瘘
N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 20;383(8):733-742. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1914617.
6
Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon versus Plain Balloon Angioplasty for Dysfunctional Autogenous Radiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistulas: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.紫杉醇涂层球囊与普通球囊血管成形术治疗功能不良的自体头静脉动静脉瘘:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Korean J Radiol. 2020 Nov;21(11):1239-1247. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2020.0067. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
7
Use of Paclitaxel Coated Drug Eluting Technology to Improve Central Vein Patency for Haemodialysis Access Circuits: Any Benefit?使用紫杉醇涂层药物洗脱技术改善血液透析通路中心静脉通畅性:有何益处?
Vasc Specialist Int. 2020 Mar 31;36(1):21-27. doi: 10.5758/vsi.2020.36.1.21.
8
A retrospective comparison analysis of results of drug-coated balloon versus plain balloon angioplasty in treatment of juxta-anastomotic de novo stenosis of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas.药物涂层球囊与普通球囊血管成形术治疗头静脉桡动脉内瘘吻合口处新发狭窄效果的回顾性对比分析
J Vasc Access. 2020 Sep;21(5):596-601. doi: 10.1177/1129729819893205. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
9
Efficacy of Paclitaxel Balloon for Hemodialysis Stenosis Fistulae After One Year Compared to High-Pressure Balloons: A Controlled, Multicenter, Randomized Trial.紫杉醇球囊治疗血液透析狭窄瘘管一年后的疗效与高压球囊比较:一项对照、多中心、随机试验。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020 Mar;43(3):382-390. doi: 10.1007/s00270-019-02372-w. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
10
The Lutonix AV Randomized Trial of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in Arteriovenous Fistula Stenosis: 2-Year Results and Subgroup Analysis.卢顿尼克斯紫杉醇涂层球囊治疗动静脉瘘狭窄随机试验:2 年结果及亚组分析。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020 Jan;31(1):1-14.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.08.035. Epub 2019 Nov 6.