The practical need to challenge the status quo: New directions in bioethics.
作者信息
Cooley D
机构信息
North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota USA.
出版信息
Ethics Med Public Health. 2020 Jul-Sep;14:100500. doi: 10.1016/j.jemep.2020.100500. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The practical need to challenge the status quo: New directions in bioethics.挑战现状的实际需求：生物伦理学的新方向。
Ethics Med Public Health. 2020 Jul-Sep;14:100500. doi: 10.1016/j.jemep.2020.100500. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
2
Accounting for context: future directions in bioethics theory and research.考虑背景因素：生物伦理学理论与研究的未来方向
Theor Med. 1996 Jun;17(2):101-19. doi: 10.1007/BF00539734.
3
When health means wealth, can bioethicists respond?当健康意味着财富时，生物伦理学家能做出回应吗？
Health Care Anal. 2001;9(2):213-28. doi: 10.1023/A:1011338404680.
4
The origins and evolution of bioethics: some personal reflections.生物伦理学的起源与演变：一些个人思考
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1999 Mar;9(1):73-88. doi: 10.1353/ken.1999.0006.
5
[Why should we research in bioethics?].我们为什么要进行生物伦理学研究？
Rev Med Chil. 2002 Aug;130(8):911-5.
6
Does ethical theory have a future in bioethics?伦理理论在生物伦理学中还有未来吗？
J Law Med Ethics. 2004 Summer;32(2):209-17, 190. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb00467.x.
7
The independence of practical ethics.实践伦理学的独立性。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2001;22(2):87-105. doi: 10.1023/a:1011403909450.
8
Bioethics and the challenges of the 21st century.
Rev Rom Bioet. 2003 Jan-Mar;1(1):31-4.
9
[The development of bioethics as a scientific discipline and the essence of bioethics].[作为一门科学学科的生物伦理学的发展及生物伦理学的本质]
Georgian Med News. 2010 May(182):25-31.
10
Critical Realism and Empirical Bioethics: A Methodological Exposition.批判实在论与实证生物伦理学：一种方法论阐述
Health Care Anal. 2017 Sep;25(3):191-211. doi: 10.1007/s10728-015-0290-2.
引用本文的文献
1
Handling Ethics Dumping and Neo-Colonial Research: From the Laboratory to the Academic Literature.处理伦理倾销和新殖民主义研究：从实验室到学术文献。
J Bioeth Inq. 2022 Sep;19(3):433-443. doi: 10.1007/s11673-022-10191-x. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
本文引用的文献
1
Why not common morality?为何不是共同的道德？
J Med Ethics. 2019 Dec;45(12):770-777. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105621. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
2
A non-ideal authenticity-based conceptualization of personal autonomy.一种基于非理想本真性的个人自主性概念化。
Med Health Care Philos. 2019 Sep;22(3):387-395. doi: 10.1007/s11019-018-9879-1.
3
Beyond a Western Bioethics in Asia and Its Implication on Autonomy.超越亚洲的西方生物伦理学及其对自主性的影响
New Bioeth. 2017 Jul;23(2):154-164. doi: 10.1080/20502877.2017.1345091. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
4
Ethical principles and concepts in medicine.医学中的伦理原则与概念。
Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;118:1-9. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53501-6.00001-9.
5
The four principles: can they be measured and do they predict ethical decision making?四项原则：它们能否被衡量以及是否可以预测伦理决策？
BMC Med Ethics. 2012 May 20;13:10. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-13-10.
6
Determining the common morality's norms in the sixth edition of Principles of Biomedical Ethics.确定《生物医学伦理学原理》第六版中的共同道德规范。
J Med Ethics. 2011 Oct;37(10):584-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.030114.
7
What principlism misses.原则主义遗漏了什么。
J Med Ethics. 2009 Apr;35(4):229-31; discussion 232-3. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.027227.
8
Principalism and moral dilemmas: a new principle.原则主义与道德困境：一项新原则。
J Med Ethics. 2005 Feb;31(2):101-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.007856.
9
Principlism and communitarianism.原则主义与社群主义。
J Med Ethics. 2003 Oct;29(5):287-91. doi: 10.1136/jme.29.5.287.
10
The principlism debate: a critical overview.原则主义辩论：批判性概述。
J Med Philos. 1995 Feb;20(1):85-105. doi: 10.1093/jmp/20.1.85.
Zotero 插件