Independent researcher, Ikenobe 3011-2, Kagawa-ken, 761-0799, Japan.
J Bioeth Inq. 2022 Sep;19(3):433-443. doi: 10.1007/s11673-022-10191-x. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
This paper explores that the topic of ethics dumping (ED), its causes and potential remedies. In ED, the weaknesses or gaps in ethics policies and systems of lower income countries are intentionally exploited for intellectual or financial gains through research and publishing by higher income countries with a more stringent or complex ethical infrastructure in which such research and publishing practices would not be permitted. Several examples are provided. Possible ED needs to be evaluated before research takes place, and detected prior to publication as an academic paper, because it might lead to a collaborative effort between a wealthier country with restrictive ethical policies and a less wealthy country with more permissive policies. Consequently, if that collaboration ultimately results in an academic paper, there are ethical ramifications of ED to scholarly communication. Institutional review board approval is central to avoid ED-based collaborations. Blind trust and goodwill alone cannot eliminate the exploitation of indigenous or "vulnerable" populations' intellect and resources. Combining community-based participatory research using clear codes of research conduct and a simple but robust verification system in academic publishing may reduce the risks of ED-based research from being published.
本文探讨了道德倾销(ED)的主题、其原因和潜在的补救措施。在 ED 中,高收入国家利用低收入国家的道德政策和制度的弱点或差距,通过在道德基础设施更为严格或复杂的情况下进行研究和发表,以获取智力或经济利益,而这些研究和发表实践在高收入国家是不被允许的。本文提供了几个例子。在开展研究之前,需要对可能存在的 ED 进行评估,并在作为学术论文发表之前进行检测,因为它可能导致具有限制性道德政策的富裕国家与具有更宽松政策的较不富裕国家之间进行合作。因此,如果这种合作最终导致学术论文发表,那么 ED 对学术交流就会产生伦理影响。机构审查委员会的批准是避免 ED 合作的核心。仅仅依靠盲目信任和善意不能消除对土著或“弱势”人群的智力和资源的剥削。通过使用明确的研究行为准则和学术出版中的简单但强大的验证系统,结合基于社区的参与式研究,可以降低基于 ED 的研究被发表的风险。