Suppr超能文献

处理伦理倾销和新殖民主义研究:从实验室到学术文献。

Handling Ethics Dumping and Neo-Colonial Research: From the Laboratory to the Academic Literature.

机构信息

Independent researcher, Ikenobe 3011-2, Kagawa-ken, 761-0799, Japan.

出版信息

J Bioeth Inq. 2022 Sep;19(3):433-443. doi: 10.1007/s11673-022-10191-x. Epub 2022 Jun 22.

Abstract

This paper explores that the topic of ethics dumping (ED), its causes and potential remedies. In ED, the weaknesses or gaps in ethics policies and systems of lower income countries are intentionally exploited for intellectual or financial gains through research and publishing by higher income countries with a more stringent or complex ethical infrastructure in which such research and publishing practices would not be permitted. Several examples are provided. Possible ED needs to be evaluated before research takes place, and detected prior to publication as an academic paper, because it might lead to a collaborative effort between a wealthier country with restrictive ethical policies and a less wealthy country with more permissive policies. Consequently, if that collaboration ultimately results in an academic paper, there are ethical ramifications of ED to scholarly communication. Institutional review board approval is central to avoid ED-based collaborations. Blind trust and goodwill alone cannot eliminate the exploitation of indigenous or "vulnerable" populations' intellect and resources. Combining community-based participatory research using clear codes of research conduct and a simple but robust verification system in academic publishing may reduce the risks of ED-based research from being published.

摘要

本文探讨了道德倾销(ED)的主题、其原因和潜在的补救措施。在 ED 中,高收入国家利用低收入国家的道德政策和制度的弱点或差距,通过在道德基础设施更为严格或复杂的情况下进行研究和发表,以获取智力或经济利益,而这些研究和发表实践在高收入国家是不被允许的。本文提供了几个例子。在开展研究之前,需要对可能存在的 ED 进行评估,并在作为学术论文发表之前进行检测,因为它可能导致具有限制性道德政策的富裕国家与具有更宽松政策的较不富裕国家之间进行合作。因此,如果这种合作最终导致学术论文发表,那么 ED 对学术交流就会产生伦理影响。机构审查委员会的批准是避免 ED 合作的核心。仅仅依靠盲目信任和善意不能消除对土著或“弱势”人群的智力和资源的剥削。通过使用明确的研究行为准则和学术出版中的简单但强大的验证系统,结合基于社区的参与式研究,可以降低基于 ED 的研究被发表的风险。

相似文献

1
Handling Ethics Dumping and Neo-Colonial Research: From the Laboratory to the Academic Literature.
J Bioeth Inq. 2022 Sep;19(3):433-443. doi: 10.1007/s11673-022-10191-x. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
The false academy: predatory publishing in science and bioethics.
Med Health Care Philos. 2017 Jun;20(2):163-170. doi: 10.1007/s11019-016-9740-3.
5
Ethical issues in publishing in predatory journals.
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2017 Jun 15;27(2):279-284. doi: 10.11613/BM.2017.030.
6
Predatory nursing journals: A case study of author prevalence and characteristics.
Nurs Ethics. 2021 Aug;28(5):823-833. doi: 10.1177/0969733020968215. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
7
Public sector reforms and their impact on the level of corruption: A systematic review.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 May 24;17(2):e1173. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1173. eCollection 2021 Jun.
8
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Health Sciences Faculty Towards Scholarly Open Access and Predatory Publishing.
Med Ref Serv Q. 2024 Jul-Sep;43(3):243-261. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2024.2373019. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
9
"Researchers' perceptions and awareness of predatory publishing: A survey".
Account Res. 2024 Jul;31(5):479-496. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2145470. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
10
Status bias in Chinese scholarly publishing: an exploratory study based on mixed methods.
Account Res. 2024 Dec;31(3):241-257. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2117621. Epub 2022 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Helicopter research: A persistent drawback to equitable collaborative research.
Ghana Med J. 2024 Jun;58(2):115-116. doi: 10.4314/gmj.v58i2.1.
4
Poor Representation of Developing Countries in Editorial Boards of Leading Obstetrics and Gynaecology Journals.
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2023 Feb 7;15(3):241-258. doi: 10.1007/s41649-023-00241-w. eCollection 2023 Jul.
5
Synthetic biology regulation in Europe: containment, release and beyond.
Synth Biol (Oxf). 2023 Apr 20;8(1):ysad009. doi: 10.1093/synbio/ysad009. eCollection 2023.
6
Despair of the Intellect, but Hope of the Heart?
J Bioeth Inq. 2022 Sep;19(3):353-356. doi: 10.1007/s11673-022-10205-8.

本文引用的文献

2
Streamlining ethics review for international health research.
Science. 2022 Feb 25;375(6583):825-826. doi: 10.1126/science.abn0675. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
3
A framework for the promotion of ethical benefit sharing in health research.
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Feb;7(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008096.
4
Commodification of biomaterials and data when funding is contingent to transfer in biobank research.
Med Health Care Philos. 2021 Dec;24(4):667-675. doi: 10.1007/s11019-021-10042-3. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
6
Ethics review of big data research: What should stay and what should be reformed?
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Apr 30;22(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00616-4.
7
Turning the tide of parachute science.
Curr Biol. 2021 Feb 22;31(4):R184-R185. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.029.
8
Research in forced displacement: guidance for a feminist and decolonial approach.
Lancet. 2021 Feb 13;397(10274):560-562. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00024-6.
10
Optimizing peer review to minimize the risk of retracting COVID-19-related literature.
Med Health Care Philos. 2021 Mar;24(1):21-26. doi: 10.1007/s11019-020-09990-z. Epub 2020 Nov 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验