Odom J V, Chao G M, Weinstein G W
Department of Ophthalmology, West Virginia University, Morgantown 26506.
Doc Ophthalmol. 1988 Sep;70(1):5-17. doi: 10.1007/BF00154731.
Many tests of visual function have been proposed as means of preoperatively evaluating cataract patients' surgical outcomes. It is impractical to compare all of these tests simultaneously on the same group of patients. Quantitative reviews apply quantitative methods to comparisons across studies. We compared the results of 52 reports in which cataract patients' postoperative acuity was predicted by means of visually evoked potential, laser interferometry, or projection tests (potential acuity meters-pinhole). The results of each study were summarized in a 2 x 2 contingency table. Summary statistics were compared by means of analysis of variance and post hoc tests. Despite difficulties in metaanalysis, we found the visually evoked potential a better predictor with dense opacities. We recommend standardization in a quest for more precise predictions of postoperative visual acuity.
许多视觉功能测试已被提出作为术前评估白内障患者手术效果的手段。在同一组患者中同时比较所有这些测试是不切实际的。定量综述将定量方法应用于跨研究的比较。我们比较了52份报告的结果,这些报告通过视觉诱发电位、激光干涉测量法或投影测试(潜在视力计 - 针孔)预测白内障患者的术后视力。每项研究的结果汇总在一个2×2列联表中。通过方差分析和事后检验比较汇总统计数据。尽管荟萃分析存在困难,但我们发现视觉诱发电位在预测重度混浊时是更好的指标。我们建议进行标准化,以更精确地预测术后视力。