Suppr超能文献

心室性快速心律失常地图引导手术后程控心室刺激的价值——心外膜与心内膜刺激对比

Value of post-operative programmed ventricular stimulation after map-guided surgery for ventricular tachyarrhythmias--epicardial versus endocardial stimulation.

作者信息

Borggrefe M, Podczeck A, Ostermeyer J, Breithardt G

机构信息

Hospital of the University of Düsseldorf, Department of Cardiology, Pneumology, and Angiology, F.R.G.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 1988 Sep;9(9):969-78. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a062602.

Abstract

To assess the efficacy of map-guided antitachycardia surgery, induction of ventricular tachycardia has mostly been performed using endocardial stimulation. In addition, epicardial stimulation can be done using temporary epicardial wires, thus not requiring post-operative catheterization. However, the diagnostic value of epicardial versus endocardial stimulation for the post-operative evaluation of patients undergoing map-guided surgery for drug-refractory ventricular tachycardia is not known, especially with regard to the induction of non-clinical tachyarrhythmias. Therefore, we compared the results of epicardial and endocardial programmed ventricular stimulation in 58 consecutive patients in whom pairs of steel wires were placed over the right ventricle during surgery. The stimulation protocol consisted of single and/or double premature stimuli during sinus rhythm and paced ventricular drives of 500, 430, 370 and 330 ms. Pre-operatively, all patients had inducible monomorphic ventricular tachycardia by endocardial stimulation. Post-operatively, 36 patients were not inducible by either epicardial or endocardial programmed ventricular stimulation, whereas epicardial and endocardial stimulation induced the clinical ventricular tachycardia in six patients and non-clinical ventricular tachycardia in three patients (45/58 patients, 77% concordant). However, in two patients the clinical ventricular tachycardia was induced only by endocardial programmed ventricular stimulation. Non-clinical ventricular tachycardia was inducible in three patients by epicardial stimulation only, and in eight patients by endocardial stimulation only (13/58 patients, 23% discordant). Thus, in 77% of patients an identical result of programmed ventricular stimulation was obtained using epicardial and endocardial stimulation, whereas the results were discordant in 23%. Therefore, epicardial stimulation alone is not sufficient for the post-operative evaluation after map-guided surgery.

摘要

为评估标测引导下抗心动过速手术的疗效,大多采用心内膜刺激来诱发室性心动过速。此外,可使用临时心外膜电极进行心外膜刺激,这样术后无需进行导管检查。然而,心外膜刺激与心内膜刺激对于接受标测引导手术治疗药物难治性室性心动过速患者的术后评估的诊断价值尚不清楚,尤其是在诱发非临床性快速心律失常方面。因此,我们比较了58例连续患者的心外膜和心内膜程控心室刺激结果,这些患者在手术期间在右心室上方放置了成对的钢丝。刺激方案包括窦性心律时的单和/或双期前刺激以及500、430、370和330毫秒的心室起搏驱动。术前,所有患者通过心内膜刺激均可诱发单形性室性心动过速。术后,36例患者的心外膜或心内膜程控心室刺激均不能诱发室性心动过速,而心外膜和心内膜刺激在6例患者中诱发了临床室性心动过速,在3例患者中诱发了非临床室性心动过速(58例患者中的45例,77%一致)。然而,在2例患者中,仅心内膜程控心室刺激诱发了临床室性心动过速。仅心外膜刺激可在3例患者中诱发非临床室性心动过速,仅心内膜刺激可在8例患者中诱发非临床室性心动过速(58例患者中的13例,23%不一致)。因此,77%的患者使用心外膜和心内膜刺激获得了相同的程控心室刺激结果,而23%的结果不一致。所以,仅心外膜刺激不足以用于标测引导手术后的术后评估。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验