Ivey T D, Brady G H, Misbach G A, Greene H L
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985 Mar;89(3):369-77.
Most reports of operations for ventricular arrhythmia have dealt with patients with anterior myocardial infarction. Patients with previous remote inferior myocardial infarction and recurrent ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation are a difficult subset of patients to treat with surgical ablative procedures. Over a 2 year period, 11 patients with prior inferior myocardial infarction and drug-refractory ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation underwent elective operation to control the arrhythmia. Five patients had monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. Three of these five patients had localized endocardial resection and/or cryoablative procedures when the ventricular tachycardia was well localized intraoperatively. In the remaining two patients, ventricular tachycardia was noninducible intraoperatively, and the patients underwent extensive endocardial resection and mitral valve replacement because of sites suspected near the posterior papillary muscle from preoperative catheter mapping. None of these five patients had inducible ventricular tachycardia postoperatively, and all are clinically free of the arrhythmia over a 24 month follow-up period. One patient with two morphologies of ventricular tachycardia previously had an unsuccessful blind endocardial resection. She underwent map-directed cryoablation of both sites of ventricular tachycardia. Postoperatively, the patient was free of inducible arrhythmia and has been asymptomatic over 8 months. Five patients had pleomorphic ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation that could not be electrically localized. One patient with ventricular fibrillation underwent extensive endocardial resection, but the posterior papillary muscle was spared. Postoperative electrophysiological study was positive. The patient has had no clinical ventricular arrhythmias on a regimen of amiodarone, however. Two patients had extensive endocardial resection and mitral valve replacement. One died early in the postoperative course and the other is clinically well. The remaining two patients had an encircling endocardial ventriculotomy. Both are clinically stable although one had inducible ventricular fibrillation postoperatively. We conclude that well-defined monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in patients with a previous inferior myocardial infarction can be successfully treated with localized endocardial resection and/or cryoablation. However, patients with poorly localized monomorphic ventricular tachycardia or pleomorphic ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation may require more extensive procedures. The role of posterior papillary muscle sacrifice with mitral valve replacement remains undefined.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
大多数关于室性心律失常手术治疗的报道都涉及前壁心肌梗死患者。既往有陈旧性下壁心肌梗死且反复发生室性心动过速或心室颤动的患者是手术消融治疗的难治性亚组。在2年期间,11例既往有下壁心肌梗死且药物难治性室性心动过速或心室颤动的患者接受了择期手术以控制心律失常。5例患者为单形性室性心动过速。这5例患者中有3例在术中室性心动过速定位良好时进行了局限性心内膜切除和/或冷冻消融术。其余2例患者术中室性心动过速不能诱发,因术前导管标测怀疑在后乳头肌附近,故进行了广泛的心内膜切除和二尖瓣置换术。这5例患者术后均无诱发的室性心动过速,在24个月的随访期内所有患者临床上均无心律失常。1例有两种形态室性心动过速的患者先前进行的盲目心内膜切除未成功。她接受了针对两个室性心动过速部位的标测指导下的冷冻消融术。术后,患者无诱发的心律失常,8个月来一直无症状。5例患者有多形性室性心动过速或心室颤动,无法进行电定位。1例心室颤动患者接受了广泛的心内膜切除,但保留了后乳头肌。术后电生理检查呈阳性。然而,该患者在服用胺碘酮治疗期间无临床室性心律失常。2例患者进行了广泛的心内膜切除和二尖瓣置换术。1例在术后早期死亡,另1例临床情况良好。其余2例患者进行了心内膜环形心室切开术。尽管其中1例术后有诱发的心室颤动,但两者临床均稳定。我们得出结论,既往有下壁心肌梗死患者明确的单形性室性心动过速可用局限性心内膜切除和/或冷冻消融术成功治疗。然而,单形性室性心动过速定位不佳或多形性室性心动过速或心室颤动患者可能需要更广泛的手术。二尖瓣置换时牺牲后乳头肌的作用仍不明确。(摘要截短至400字)