Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚和新西兰重症监护学会(ANZICS)关于 COVID-19 大流行期间复杂决策的指导原则。

ANZICS guiding principles for complex decision making during the COVID-19 pandemic.

作者信息

Warrillow Stephen, Austin Danielle, Cheung Winston, Close Eliana, Holley Anthony, Horgan Ben, Jansen Melanie, Joynt Gavin, Lister Paula, Moodie Stewart, Nichol Alistair, Nicholls Mark, Peake Sandra, Skowronski George, Streat Stephen, White Ben, Willmott Lindy

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Intensive Care Unit, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Crit Care Resusc. 2020 Apr 15;22(2):98-102. doi: 10.51893/2020.2.sa1.

Abstract

The global 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has led to major challenges in clinical decision making when the demand for intensive care exceeds local capacity. In order to promote consistent, transparent, objective and ethical decision making, the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) formed a committee to urgently develop guidelines outlining key principles that should be utilised during the pandemic. This guidance is intended to support the practice of intensive care specialists during the COVID-19 pandemic and to promote the development of local admission policies that should be endorsed by health care organisations and relevant local authorities.

摘要

全球2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行导致在重症监护需求超过当地能力时,临床决策面临重大挑战。为了促进一致、透明、客观和符合伦理的决策,澳大利亚和新西兰重症监护学会(ANZICS)成立了一个委员会,紧急制定指南,概述大流行期间应遵循的关键原则。本指南旨在支持COVID-19大流行期间重症监护专家的实践,并促进制定应由医疗保健组织和相关地方当局认可的当地收治政策。

相似文献

1
ANZICS guiding principles for complex decision making during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Crit Care Resusc. 2020 Apr 15;22(2):98-102. doi: 10.51893/2020.2.sa1.
2
Managing haematology and oncology patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: interim consensus guidance.
Med J Aust. 2020 Jun;212(10):481-489. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50607. Epub 2020 May 13.
3
Managing intensive care admissions when there are not enough beds during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.
Thorax. 2021 Mar;76(3):302-312. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-215518. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
4
Thirty years of ANZICS CORE: A clinical quality success story.
Crit Care Resusc. 2023 May 20;25(1):43-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.04.009. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
Ethical conflict during COVID-19 pandemic: the case of Spanish and Italian intensive care units.
Int Nurs Rev. 2021 Jun;68(2):181-188. doi: 10.1111/inr.12645. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
7
Principles Guiding Nonpandemic Critical Care Research During a Pandemic.
Crit Care Med. 2020 Oct;48(10):1403-1410. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004538.

引用本文的文献

1
Who gets the last bed in the intensive care unit: Nonmedical factors in delaying an operation.
JTCVS Open. 2025 Jun 20;26:329-333. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2025.06.008. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
A modular approach to forecasting COVID-19 hospital bed occupancy.
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 Aug 12;5(1):349. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-01086-0.
3
Moral Decision-Making in Healthcare and Medical Professions During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Trends Psychol. 2023;31(1):210-230. doi: 10.1007/s43076-021-00118-7. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
9
Negative pressure rooms in operating theatres in the midst of an airborne pandemic.
Indian J Anaesth. 2022 Aug;66(8):599-601. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_122_22. Epub 2022 Aug 22.

本文引用的文献

1
A Framework for Rationing Ventilators and Critical Care Beds During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1773-1774. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.5046.
3
Prioritising Healthcare Workers for Ebola Treatment: Treating Those at Greatest Risk to Confer Greatest Benefit.
Dev World Bioeth. 2015 Aug;15(2):59-67. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12079. Epub 2015 Feb 6.
5
Healthcare workers' attitudes to working during pandemic influenza: a qualitative study.
BMC Public Health. 2009 Feb 12;9:56. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-56.
6
Mortality predictions in the intensive care unit: comparing physicians with scoring systems.
Crit Care Med. 2006 Mar;34(3):878-85. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000201881.58644.41.
7
Fair allocation of intensive care unit resources. American Thoracic Society.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Oct;156(4 Pt 1):1282-301. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.156.4.ats7-97.
8
Prospective comparison of clinical judgment and APACHE II score in predicting the outcome in critically ill surgical patients.
J Trauma. 1992 Jun;32(6):747-53; discussion 753-4. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199206000-00013.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验