MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Thorax. 2021 Mar;76(3):302-312. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-215518. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
The surge in cases of severe COVID-19 has resulted in clinicians triaging intensive care unit (ICU) admissions in places where demand has exceeded capacity. In order to assist difficult triage decisions, clinicians require clear guidelines on how to prioritise patients. Existing guidelines show significant variability in their development, interpretation, implementation and an urgent need for a robust synthesis of published guidance. To understand how to manage which patients are admitted to ICU, and receive mechanical ventilatory support, during periods of high demand during the COVID-19 pandemic, a systematic review was performed. Databases of indexed literature (Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Global Health) and grey literature (Google.com and MedRxiv), published from 1 January until 2 April 2020, were searched. Search terms included synonyms of COVID-19, ICU, ventilation, and triage. Only formal written guidelines were included. There were no exclusion criteria based on geographical location or publication language. Quality appraisal of the guidelines was performed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation Instrument II (AGREE II) and the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation Instrument Recommendation EXcellence (AGREE REX) appraisal tools, and key themes related to triage were extracted using narrative synthesis. Of 1902 unique records identified, nine relevant guidelines were included. Six guidelines were national or transnational level guidance (UK, Switzerland, Belgium, Australia and New Zealand, Italy, and Sri Lanka), with one state level (Kansas, USA), one international (Extracorporeal Life Support Organization) and one specific to military hospitals (Department of Defense, USA). The guidelines covered several broad themes: use of ethical frameworks, criteria for ICU admission and discharge, adaptation of criteria as demand changes, equality across health conditions and healthcare systems, decision-making processes, communication of decisions, and guideline development processes. We have synthesised the current guidelines and identified the different approaches taken globally to manage the triage of intensive care resources during the COVID-19 pandemic. There is limited consensus on how to allocate the finite resource of ICU beds and ventilators, and a lack of high-quality evidence and guidelines on resource allocation during the pandemic. We have developed a set of factors to consider when developing guidelines for managing intensive care admissions, and outlined implications for clinical leads and local implementation.
COVID-19 病例的激增导致临床医生在需求超过能力的地方对重症监护病房 (ICU) 入院进行分类。为了协助进行困难的分诊决策,临床医生需要明确的指南来确定患者的优先顺序。现有的指南在制定、解释、实施方面存在显著差异,迫切需要对已发表的指导意见进行强有力的综合分析。为了了解在 COVID-19 大流行期间需求高峰期如何管理哪些患者入住 ICU 并接受机械通气支持,进行了系统评价。从 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 4 月 2 日,检索了索引文献数据库(Medline、Embase、Web of Science 和 Global Health)和灰色文献数据库(Google.com 和 MedRxiv)。检索词包括 COVID-19、ICU、通气和分诊的同义词。仅纳入正式书面指南。不基于地理位置或出版语言排除标准。使用评估研究和评估工具 II(AGREE II)和评估研究和评估工具建议卓越性(AGREE REX)评估工具对指南进行质量评估,并使用叙述性综合法提取与分诊相关的关键主题。在 1902 条独特记录中,确定了 9 条相关指南。其中 6 条是国家或跨国层面的指南(英国、瑞士、比利时、澳大利亚和新西兰、意大利和斯里兰卡),1 条是州级(美国堪萨斯州),1 条是国际层面的(体外生命支持组织),1 条是专门针对军事医院的(美国国防部)。这些指南涵盖了几个广泛的主题:使用伦理框架、ICU 入院和出院标准、根据需求变化调整标准、平等对待各种健康状况和医疗保健系统、决策过程、决策沟通以及指南制定过程。我们综合了当前的指南,并确定了全球在管理 COVID-19 大流行期间 ICU 资源分类方面采取的不同方法。如何分配 ICU 床位和呼吸机等有限资源的共识有限,并且在大流行期间缺乏资源分配的高质量证据和指南。我们制定了一套在制定管理 ICU 入院指南时需要考虑的因素,并概述了对临床领导和当地实施的影响。