Klock Ethan, Mwinnya George, Eller Leigh Anne, Fernandez Reinaldo E, Kibuuka Hannah, Nitayaphan Sorachai, Kosgei Josphat, Moore Richard D, Robb Merlin, Eshleman Susan H, Laeyendecker Oliver
The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2020 Jul;36(7):583-589. doi: 10.1089/AID.2019.0286. Epub 2020 May 27.
Antiretroviral therapy (ART) can impact assays used for cross-sectional HIV incidence testing, causing inaccurate HIV incidence estimates. We evaluated the relationship between the timing of ART initiation and the performance of two serologic HIV incidence assays. We analyzed 302 samples from 55 individuals from the RV217 cohort (Early Capture HIV Cohort Study). Participants were grouped by ART start time: ART started <1 year after infection ( = 9); ART started 1-3 years after infection ( = 12); and never received ART ( = 34). Samples were tested using the Sedia LAg-Avidity and Johns Hopkins modified Bio-Rad-Avidity assays. Results were compared with those from the Johns Hopkins HIV Cohort in which participants initiated ART an average of 10 years after infection ( = 17). Participants on ART were virally suppressed at the time of sample collection. The increase in normalized optical density (ODn) values was an average of 2.15 U/year lower in participants who started ART <1 year after infection than in those who did not start ART. Participants who started ART 1-3 years after infection had a decline in ODn values 0.90 U/year faster compared with those who started ART an average of 10 years after infection. Timing of ART initiation did not significantly impact results obtained with the Bio-Rad-Avidity assay. ART initiation <1 year after HIV infection was associated with persistently low limiting antigen (Lag)-Avidity values; this could lead to overestimation of HIV incidence. LAg-Avidity values declined more rapidly the earlier ART was initiated. Bio-Rad-Avidity values were not impacted by the timing of ART initiation.
抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)会影响用于横断面HIV发病率检测的检测方法,导致HIV发病率估计不准确。我们评估了开始ART的时间与两种血清学HIV发病率检测方法性能之间的关系。我们分析了来自RV217队列(早期捕获HIV队列研究)55名个体的302份样本。参与者按ART开始时间分组:感染后<1年开始ART(=9);感染后1 - 3年开始ART(=12);从未接受ART(=34)。使用Sedia LAg - 亲和力检测和约翰霍普金斯大学改良的Bio - Rad - 亲和力检测对样本进行检测。将结果与约翰霍普金斯HIV队列的结果进行比较,该队列中的参与者平均在感染后10年开始ART(=17)。样本采集时接受ART的参与者病毒得到抑制。感染后<1年开始ART的参与者,其标准化光密度(ODn)值的增加平均每年比未开始ART的参与者低2.15 U。与平均在感染后10年开始ART的参与者相比,感染后1 - 3年开始ART的参与者ODn值下降速度快0.90 U/年。开始ART的时间对Bio - Rad - 亲和力检测获得的结果没有显著影响。HIV感染后<1年开始ART与持续低的限制性抗原(Lag) - 亲和力值相关;这可能导致对HIV发病率的高估。ART开始得越早,Lag - 亲和力值下降得越快。Bio - Rad - 亲和力值不受ART开始时间的影响。