• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

要求使用处方药物监测计划对急诊开阿片类药物的影响:单中心分析。

Effect of a Law Requiring Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Use on Emergency Department Opioid Prescribing: A Single-Center Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Services, Hartford Hospital, CT, USA.

University of Connecticut, School of Pharmacy, Storrs, CT, USA.

出版信息

J Pharm Pract. 2021 Oct;34(5):774-779. doi: 10.1177/0897190020918096. Epub 2020 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1177/0897190020918096
PMID:32295459
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare opioid prescribing behavior of emergency medicine providers following the enactment of Connecticut Public Act (PA) 15-198 at a large academic tertiary medical center.

METHODS

This study is a single-center pre and postlaw retrospective cohort of ED patients discharged with opioid prescriptions. Patients discharged from January 1, 2015, to June 30, 2015, were analyzed as the prelaw cohort, and patients discharged from January 1, 2016, to June 30, 2016, were analyzed as the postlaw cohort. The primary outcome was the cumulative dose of solid dosage forms of opioids per prescription, calculated in morphine milligram equivalents (MME).

RESULTS

A total of 10,307 prescriptions included in the final analysis. A statistically significant decrease in the primary outcome was seen in the postlaw cohort compared with the prelaw cohort, respectively (75 MME [interquartile range, IQR: 60-100) vs 80 MME [IQR: 75-150]; < .001). The postlaw cohort also saw 1289 (22.2%) fewer opioid prescriptions, primarily driven by a reduction in the number of schedule II opioids prescribed. In a posthoc analysis, the primary outcome remained statistically significant even when opioid prescriptions were only included if their prebuilt settings were unchanged between pre and postlaw cohorts, respectively (85.1%; 95.6 MME (±56.0); n = 5041 vs 86.7 MME (±39.6); n = 3713; < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The passage of PA 15-198 was associated with a decrease in the cumulative dose of opioids per prescription of solid dosage form products. This drop was precipitated by a transition from using opioids in schedule II to opioids in schedule IV and a modest decrease in prescribed opioid quantity.

摘要

目的

在一家大型学术三级医疗中心,比较康涅狄格州公共法案(PA)15-198 颁布后,急诊医学提供者开具阿片类药物的行为。

方法

本研究为单中心、法案前后回顾性队列研究,纳入从 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 6 月 30 日出院并开具阿片类药物处方的 ED 患者作为法案前队列,纳入从 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 6 月 30 日出院并开具阿片类药物处方的患者作为法案后队列。主要结局是计算每处方的固体剂型阿片类药物的累积剂量,以吗啡毫克当量(MME)表示。

结果

最终分析共纳入 10307 份处方。与法案前队列相比,法案后队列的主要结局明显下降,分别为(75 MME [四分位距,IQR:60-100] 比 80 MME [IQR:75-150];<0.001)。法案后队列的阿片类药物处方也减少了 1289 份(22.2%),主要原因是开具的 II 类阿片类药物数量减少。在事后分析中,即使仅包括前后两个队列中预先设定不变的阿片类药物处方,主要结局仍具有统计学意义(分别为 85.1%;95.6 MME(±56.0);n=5041 比 86.7 MME(±39.6);n=3713;<0.001)。

结论

PA 15-198 的通过与每处方固体剂型产品阿片类药物累积剂量的降低相关。这种下降是由从 II 类阿片类药物过渡到 IV 类阿片类药物以及规定的阿片类药物数量适度减少引起的。

相似文献

1
Effect of a Law Requiring Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Use on Emergency Department Opioid Prescribing: A Single-Center Analysis.要求使用处方药物监测计划对急诊开阿片类药物的影响:单中心分析。
J Pharm Pract. 2021 Oct;34(5):774-779. doi: 10.1177/0897190020918096. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
2
Change in Postoperative Opioid Prescribing Patterns for Oculoplastic and Orbital Procedures Associated With State Opioid Legislation.州级阿片类药物立法相关的眼整形和眼眶手术术后阿片类药物处方模式的变化。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb 1;139(2):157-162. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.5446.
3
Alternatives to Opioid Education and a Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Cumulatively Decreased Outpatient Opioid Prescriptions.替代阿片类药物教育和处方药物监测计划的累积作用降低了门诊阿片类药物处方量。
Pain Med. 2021 Feb 23;22(2):499-505. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa278.
4
A retrospective analysis of the impact of Michigan's opioid prescribing legislation on discharge opioid prescribing at a single institution.密歇根州阿片类药物处方立法对单一医疗机构出院阿片类药物处方影响的回顾性分析。
J Opioid Manag. 2022 Sep-Oct;18(5):467-474. doi: 10.5055/jom.2022.0740.
5
Changes in opioid prescribing after implementation of mandatory registration and proactive reports within California's prescription drug monitoring program.加利福尼亚州处方药物监测计划实施强制性登记和主动报告后,阿片类药物处方的变化。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Jan 1;218:108405. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108405. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
6
Effect of a legislative mandate on opioid prescribing for back pain in the emergency department.立法要求对急诊科治疗背痛的阿片类药物处方的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Nov;37(11):2035-2038. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.02.031. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
7
The Supply of Prescription Opioids: Contributions of Episodic-Care Prescribers and High-Quantity Prescribers.处方阿片类药物的供应:偶发性医疗保健开方者和高用量开方者的贡献。
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Jun;71(6):668-673.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.10.016. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
8
Assessing the impact of a restrictive opioid prescribing law in West Virginia.评估西弗吉尼亚州限制阿片类药物处方法律的影响。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2021 Feb 1;16(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13011-021-00349-y.
9
Effects of State Law Limiting Postoperative Opioid Prescription in Patients After Cesarean Delivery.州法律限制剖宫产术后患者术后阿片类药物处方的效果。
Anesth Analg. 2021 Mar 1;132(3):752-760. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004993.
10
Effect of Changing Electronic Health Record Opioid Analgesic Dispense Quantity Defaults on the Quantity Prescribed: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.改变电子健康记录阿片类镇痛药配给数量默认值对处方数量的影响:一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e217481. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.7481.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Interventions to Reduce Opioid Prescribing for Patients Discharged From the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.评价减少急诊科出院患者阿片类药物处方干预措施的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2143425. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.43425.