• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估西弗吉尼亚州限制阿片类药物处方法律的影响。

Assessing the impact of a restrictive opioid prescribing law in West Virginia.

机构信息

School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA.

West Virginia Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Morgantown, WV, USA.

出版信息

Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2021 Feb 1;16(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13011-021-00349-y.

DOI:10.1186/s13011-021-00349-y
PMID:33526045
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7852151/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Opioid Reduction Act (SB 273) took effect in West Virginia in June 2018. This legislation limited ongoing chronic opioid prescriptions to 30 days' supply, and first-time opioid prescriptions to 7 days' supply for surgeons and 3 days' for emergency rooms and dentists. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of this legislation on reducing opioid prescriptions in West Virginia, with the goal of informing future similar policy efforts.

METHODS

Data were requested from the state Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) including overall number of opioid prescriptions, number of first-time opioid prescriptions, average daily morphine milligram equivalents (MME) and prescription duration (expressed as "days' supply") given to adults during the 64 week time periods before and after legislation enactment. Statistical analysis was done utilizing an autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) interrupted time series analysis to assess impact of both legislation announcement and enactment while controlling secular trends and considering autocorrelation trends. Benzodiazepine prescriptions were utilized as a control.

RESULTS

Our analysis demonstrates a significant decrease in overall state opioid prescribing as well as a small change in average daily MME associated with the date of the legislation's enactment when considering serial correlation in the time series and accounting for pre-intervention trends. There was no such association found with benzodiazepine prescriptions.

CONCLUSION

Results of the current study suggest that SB 273 was associated with an average 22.1% decrease of overall opioid prescriptions and a small change in average daily MME relative to the date of legislative implementation in West Virginia. There was, however, no association of the legislation on first-time opioid prescriptions or days' supply of opioid medication, and all variables were trending downward prior to implementation of SB 273. The control demonstrated no relationship to the law.

摘要

背景

《阿片类药物减少法案》(SB 273)于 2018 年 6 月在西弗吉尼亚州生效。该法案将持续的慢性阿片类药物处方限制在 30 天供应量以内,首次开阿片类药物处方的外科医生为 7 天供应量,急诊室和牙医为 3 天供应量。本研究的目的是确定该立法对减少西弗吉尼亚州阿片类药物处方的影响,以期为未来类似的政策努力提供信息。

方法

从州处方药物监测计划(PDMP)中请求数据,包括在立法颁布前后的 64 周时间内,成年人的阿片类药物总处方数量、首次阿片类药物处方数量、平均每日吗啡毫克当量(MME)和处方持续时间(表示为“供应天数”)。利用自回归综合移动平均(ARIMA)中断时间序列分析进行统计分析,以评估立法公告和颁布对控制季节性趋势和考虑自相关趋势的影响。苯二氮䓬类药物处方被用作对照。

结果

我们的分析表明,在考虑时间序列中的序列相关性并考虑干预前趋势的情况下,整体州阿片类药物处方显著减少,与立法颁布日期相关的平均每日 MME 略有变化。然而,苯二氮䓬类药物处方没有发现这种关联。

结论

当前研究的结果表明,SB 273 与西弗吉尼亚州立法实施日期相关,整体阿片类药物处方平均减少 22.1%,平均每日 MME 略有变化。然而,立法对首次阿片类药物处方或阿片类药物供应天数没有影响,并且在实施 SB 273 之前,所有变量都呈下降趋势。控制变量与法律没有关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68ea/7852151/49e2d5b9dbe9/13011_2021_349_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68ea/7852151/bbf436080d92/13011_2021_349_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68ea/7852151/f0107eb7832a/13011_2021_349_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68ea/7852151/4535f3da7044/13011_2021_349_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68ea/7852151/af6f7111aee9/13011_2021_349_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68ea/7852151/87c50223dff7/13011_2021_349_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68ea/7852151/5526b80a7fe6/13011_2021_349_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68ea/7852151/e6999ffdfcc3/13011_2021_349_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68ea/7852151/49e2d5b9dbe9/13011_2021_349_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68ea/7852151/bbf436080d92/13011_2021_349_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68ea/7852151/f0107eb7832a/13011_2021_349_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68ea/7852151/4535f3da7044/13011_2021_349_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68ea/7852151/af6f7111aee9/13011_2021_349_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68ea/7852151/87c50223dff7/13011_2021_349_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68ea/7852151/5526b80a7fe6/13011_2021_349_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68ea/7852151/e6999ffdfcc3/13011_2021_349_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68ea/7852151/49e2d5b9dbe9/13011_2021_349_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the impact of a restrictive opioid prescribing law in West Virginia.评估西弗吉尼亚州限制阿片类药物处方法律的影响。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2021 Feb 1;16(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13011-021-00349-y.
2
The effect of targeted insurer-mandated prescription monitoring on opioid prescribing patterns.目标保险公司强制处方监测对阿片类药物处方模式的影响。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2020 Jul-Aug;60(4):559-564. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2019.12.019. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
3
Opioid days' supply limits: an interrupted time-series analysis of opioid prescribing before and following a Massachusetts law.阿片类药物日供应量限制:马萨诸塞州法律颁布前后阿片类药物处方的中断时间序列分析。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2021 May 4;47(3):350-359. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2020.1853140. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
4
The effect of an opioid prescription days' supply limit on patients receiving long-term opioid treatment.阿片类药物处方天数供应限制对接受长期阿片类药物治疗的患者的影响。
Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Mar;77:102662. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102662. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
5
Impact of Statewide Statute Limiting Days' Supply to Opioid-Naive Patients.全美范围内限制阿片类药物初治患者供应天数法规的影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2024 Jan;66(1):112-118. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.08.015. Epub 2023 Aug 20.
6
Association Between Statewide Opioid Prescribing Interventions and Opioid Prescribing Patterns in North Carolina, 2006-2018.2006-2018 年北卡罗来纳州全州范围阿片类药物处方干预措施与阿片类药物处方模式的关联。
Pain Med. 2021 Dec 11;22(12):2931-2940. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab181.
7
Effect of Florida's Prescription Drug Monitoring Program and Pill Mill Laws on Opioid Prescribing and Use.佛罗里达州的处方药监测计划和“药丸工厂”法对阿片类药物处方和使用的影响。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Oct;175(10):1642-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.3931.
8
Impact of Iowa's Prescription Monitoring Program on Opioid Pain Reliever Prescribing Patterns: An Interrupted Time Series Study 2003-2014.爱荷华州处方监测计划对阿片类止痛药处方模式的影响:2003-2014 年的中断时间序列研究。
Pain Med. 2019 Feb 1;20(2):290-300. doi: 10.1093/pm/pny029.
9
Trends in Use of Prescription Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Medications Before vs After Implementation of a Florida Law Restricting Opioid Prescribing for Acute Pain.佛罗里达州限制阿片类药物治疗急性疼痛的法规实施前后处方非甾体抗炎药使用趋势
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2113383. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13383.
10
Effect of a Law Requiring Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Use on Emergency Department Opioid Prescribing: A Single-Center Analysis.要求使用处方药物监测计划对急诊开阿片类药物的影响:单中心分析。
J Pharm Pract. 2021 Oct;34(5):774-779. doi: 10.1177/0897190020918096. Epub 2020 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Burden of Tracheal, Bronchus, and Lung Cancer Attributable to High Fasting Plasma Glucose.空腹血糖升高所致气管、支气管和肺癌负担
Arch Iran Med. 2025 May 1;28(5):286-295. doi: 10.34172/aim.33332.
2
An updated view on the influence of initial opioid prescription characteristics on long-term opioid use among opioid naïve patients.更新视角:初诊阿片类药物特征对阿片类药物初治患者长期使用阿片类药物的影响。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2024 Dec 1;265:112463. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.112463. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
3
Back Pain in the Era of Opioid Restriction and Implications for Neurosurgeons Based on Qualitative Findings From a Rural State.

本文引用的文献

1
How increasing medical access to opioids contributes to the opioid epidemic: Evidence from Medicare Part D.增加阿片类药物的医疗可及性如何导致阿片类药物流行:来自医疗保险处方药部分的证据。
J Health Econ. 2020 May;71:102286. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.102286. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
2
Changes in Opioid Use After Florida's Restriction Law for Acute Pain Prescriptions.佛罗里达州限制急性疼痛处方阿片类药物使用后阿片类药物使用的变化。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e200234. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0234.
3
The effect of an opioid prescription days' supply limit on patients receiving long-term opioid treatment.
阿片类药物限制时代的背痛及基于一个农村州定性研究结果对神经外科医生的启示
Cureus. 2024 Apr 1;16(4):e57389. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57389. eCollection 2024 Apr.
4
Prescription opioid dispensing patterns among patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.精神分裂症或双相情感障碍患者的处方阿片类药物配给模式。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Apr 2;24(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05676-5.
5
"They either leave you or they get involved in it": Familial factors influencing drug use amongst Appalachian people.“他们要么离开你,要么卷入其中”:影响阿巴拉契亚人群药物使用的家庭因素。
J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2024 Feb 22:1-14. doi: 10.1080/15332640.2024.2316650.
6
Opioid Prescribing Patterns After Imposition of Setting-Specific Limits on Prescription Duration.实施特定处方持续时间限制后阿片类药物的处方模式。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Jan 5;5(1):e234731. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.4731.
7
Comparing the effects of decreasing prescription opioid shipments and the release of an abuse deterrent OxyContin formulation on opioid overdose fatalities in WV: an interrupted time series study.比较减少处方类阿片药物发货量和发布一种滥用威慑型羟考酮配方对 WV 地区阿片类药物过量死亡的影响:一项中断时间序列研究。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2024 Jan 4;19(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13011-023-00587-2.
8
The Impact of Opioid Prescribing Limits on Drug Usage in South Carolina: A Novel Geospatial and Time Series Data Analysis.阿片类药物处方限制对南卡罗来纳州药物使用的影响:一项新型地理空间和时间序列数据分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 14;11(8):1132. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11081132.
9
Geographic variation in the frequency and potency of postoperative opioid prescriptions for extremity fracture surgery. A retrospective cohort study.四肢骨折手术术后阿片类药物处方频率和效力的地域差异。一项回顾性队列研究。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022 Jun 16;30:101921. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101921. eCollection 2022 Jul.
10
"The DEA would come in and destroy you": a qualitative study of fear and unintended consequences among opioid prescribers in WV.“DEA(美国缉毒局)会介入并摧毁你”:一项针对西弗吉尼亚州阿片类药物处方医生的恐惧和意外后果的定性研究。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2022 Mar 10;17(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13011-022-00447-5.
阿片类药物处方天数供应限制对接受长期阿片类药物治疗的患者的影响。
Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Mar;77:102662. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102662. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
4
Association of State Opioid Duration Limits With Postoperative Opioid Prescribing.州级阿片类药物持续时间限制与术后阿片类药物处方的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1918361. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18361.
5
Effects of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax on prices and affordability of soft drinks in Chile: A time series analysis.含糖饮料税对智利软饮料价格和可负担性的影响:一项时间序列分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Jan;245:112708. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112708. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
6
Association between National Treatment Guidelines for Upper Respiratory Tract Infections and Outpatient Pediatric Antibiotic Use in France: An Interrupted Time-Series Analysis.法国国家上呼吸道感染治疗指南与儿科门诊抗生素使用的关联:一项中断时间序列分析。
J Pediatr. 2020 Jan;216:88-94.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.09.017. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
7
Opioid prescriptions for acute pain after outpatient surgery at a large public university-affiliated hospital: Impact of state legislation in Florida.佛罗里达州州立法对大型公立大学附属医院门诊手术后急性疼痛的阿片类药物处方的影响。
Surgery. 2019 Sep;166(3):375-379. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.04.022. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
8
Mandatory Prescription Limits and Opioid Utilization Following Orthopaedic Surgery.强制性处方限制与骨科手术后阿片类药物的使用。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 May 15;101(10):e43. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00943.
9
Opioid Prescribing Limits for Acute Pain: Potential Problems With Design and Implementation.急性疼痛的阿片类药物处方限制:设计与实施中的潜在问题
JAMA. 2019 Feb 19;321(7):643-644. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.0010.
10
Laws limiting the prescribing or dispensing of opioids for acute pain in the United States: A national systematic legal review.美国限制阿片类药物用于急性疼痛处方或配药的法律:全国系统法律审查。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Jan 1;194:166-172. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.09.022. Epub 2018 Nov 3.