• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

惊恐障碍严重程度自评量表中文版在惊恐障碍患者中的信度、效度和截断值。

Reliability, validity and cut-off score of the Chinese version of the panic disorder severity scale self-report form in patients with panic disorder.

机构信息

Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No.600 South Wanping Road, Shanghai, 200030, China.

Department of Psychological Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No.180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 15;20(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02560-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12888-020-02560-w
PMID:32295552
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7160984/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Panic disorder (PD) is often undiagnosed, misdiagnosed, or untreated in non-psychiatric clinical settings. Therefore, a cost-effective, accurate and easy-to-administer instrument for PD assessment is still needed. For that reason, the self-report version of the Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS-SR) has been developed and suggested to be a reliable and useful tool in clinical and research settings. The current study aims to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the PDSS-SR and determine the cut-off score of the PDSS-SR.

METHODS

A total of 133 patients with PD in Shanghai were assessed by the PDSS-SR, PDSS and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA). Moreover, 117 patients with non-PD anxiety and 51 healthy subjects also completed the PDSS-SR to construct a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve with the scores of PD patients.

RESULTS

The internal consistency (Cronbach's α) of the PDSS-SR was 0.72-0.80, and the interrater correlation coefficient was 0.78. The results of principal component analysis and varimax rotation indicated that the PDSS-SR had a two-factor structure, with all seven items having salient loadings. The cut-off score was 4, which was associated with high sensitivity (96.03%) and specificity (61.31%).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings demonstrate that these items and the total score of the PDSS-SR have acceptable reliability and validity in patients with PD and that the PDSS-SR can be used by general doctors for clinical screening in China.

摘要

背景

惊恐障碍(PD)在非精神科临床环境中常常未被诊断、误诊或未得到治疗。因此,仍然需要一种经济有效、准确且易于管理的 PD 评估工具。出于这个原因,开发了惊恐障碍严重程度量表(PDSS-SR)的自评版本,并建议其在临床和研究环境中是一种可靠且有用的工具。本研究旨在评估 PDSS-SR 的中文版的信度和效度,并确定 PDSS-SR 的截断分数。

方法

共有 133 名来自上海的 PD 患者接受了 PDSS-SR、PDSS 和汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)的评估。此外,117 名非 PD 焦虑患者和 51 名健康受试者也完成了 PDSS-SR,以构建 PD 患者评分的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。

结果

PDSS-SR 的内部一致性(Cronbach's α)为 0.72-0.80,评分者间相关性系数为 0.78。主成分分析和方差极大旋转的结果表明,PDSS-SR 具有两因素结构,所有七个项目都具有明显的负荷。截断分数为 4,具有较高的灵敏度(96.03%)和特异性(61.31%)。

结论

这些项目和 PDSS-SR 的总分在 PD 患者中具有可接受的信度和效度,PDSS-SR 可由中国的普通医生用于临床筛查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35f1/7160984/8556ad490661/12888_2020_2560_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35f1/7160984/8556ad490661/12888_2020_2560_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35f1/7160984/8556ad490661/12888_2020_2560_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability, validity and cut-off score of the Chinese version of the panic disorder severity scale self-report form in patients with panic disorder.惊恐障碍严重程度自评量表中文版在惊恐障碍患者中的信度、效度和截断值。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 15;20(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02560-w.
2
Psychometric analysis of the Swedish panic disorder severity scale and its self-report version.瑞典惊恐障碍严重程度量表及其自我报告版本的心理测量分析。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2019 Jan;73(1):58-63. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2018.1554699. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
3
Reliability and validity of the self-report version of the Panic Disorder Severity Scale in Korea.韩国惊恐障碍严重程度量表自我报告版的信度和效度。
Depress Anxiety. 2009;26(8):E120-3. doi: 10.1002/da.20461.
4
Psychometric properties of the Spanish self-report version of the panic disorder severity scale.惊恐障碍严重程度自评量表西班牙语自评版本的心理测量学特性。
Compr Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;55(6):1467-72. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.04.007. Epub 2014 Apr 12.
5
Reliability of the self-report version of the panic disorder severity scale.惊恐障碍严重程度量表自我报告版本的信度
Depress Anxiety. 2002;15(4):183-5. doi: 10.1002/da.10049.
6
Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the Panic Disorder Severity Scale.惊恐障碍严重程度量表的西班牙语版本的心理测量特性。
Span J Psychol. 2018 Mar 25;21:E5. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2018.6.
7
Panic Disorder Severity Scale: reliability and validity of the Turkish version.惊恐障碍严重程度量表:土耳其语版本的信度和效度
Depress Anxiety. 2004;20(1):8-16. doi: 10.1002/da.20011.
8
French adaptation and validation of the Panic Disorder Severity Scale-self-report.惊恐障碍严重程度自评量表的法语改编和验证。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 27;22(1):434. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03989-x.
9
Reliability and validity of the Panic Disorder Severity Scale: replication and extension.惊恐障碍严重程度量表的信度与效度:重复研究与扩展
J Psychiatr Res. 2001 Sep-Oct;35(5):293-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3956(01)00028-0.
10
Cross-cultural evaluation of the Panic Disorder Severity Scale in Japan.日本惊恐障碍严重程度量表的跨文化评估
Depress Anxiety. 2004;20(1):17-22. doi: 10.1002/da.20029.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive impairment in Chinese adult patients with type III spinal muscular atrophy without disease-modifying treatment.未经疾病修正治疗的中国成年III型脊髓性肌萎缩症患者的认知障碍
Front Neurol. 2023 Nov 3;14:1226043. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1226043. eCollection 2023.
2
Enhancing panic disorder treatment with mobile-aided case management: an exploratory study based on a 3-year cohort analysis.通过移动辅助病例管理加强惊恐障碍治疗:一项基于3年队列分析的探索性研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 19;14:1203194. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1203194. eCollection 2023.
3
French adaptation and validation of the Panic Disorder Severity Scale-self-report.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the Panic Disorder Severity Scale.惊恐障碍严重程度量表的西班牙语版本的心理测量特性。
Span J Psychol. 2018 Mar 25;21:E5. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2018.6.
2
Meta-analysis of the prevalence of anxiety disorders in mainland China from 2000 to 2015.2000 年至 2015 年中国大陆焦虑障碍患病率的 Meta 分析。
Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 16;6:28033. doi: 10.1038/srep28033.
3
Impaired cognitive reappraisal in panic disorder revealed by the late positive potential.晚期正电位揭示惊恐障碍中认知重评受损。
惊恐障碍严重程度自评量表的法语改编和验证。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 27;22(1):434. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03989-x.
4
Panic Attack Prediction Using Wearable Devices and Machine Learning: Development and Cohort Study.使用可穿戴设备和机器学习进行惊恐发作预测:开发与队列研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Feb 15;10(2):e33063. doi: 10.2196/33063.
Neuroreport. 2016 Jan 20;27(2):99-103. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000504.
4
Panic disorder prevalence among patients referred for an electrocardiogram in a Nigerian teaching hospital.尼日利亚教学医院因心电图检查而转诊的患者中惊恐障碍的患病率。
Psychosomatics. 2013 Sep-Oct;54(5):472-8. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2013.02.010. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
5
The economic cost of brain disorders in Europe.欧洲脑部疾病的经济负担。
Eur J Neurol. 2012 Jan;19(1):155-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03590.x.
6
New treatment options for panic disorder: clinical trials from 2000 to 2010.惊恐障碍的新治疗选择:2000 年至 2010 年的临床试验。
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2011 Jun;12(9):1419-28. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2011.562200. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
7
Clinical and subthreshold panic disorder.临床和阈下惊恐障碍。
Depress Anxiety. 2010 Apr;27(4):381-9. doi: 10.1002/da.20622.
8
Reliability and validity of the self-report version of the Panic Disorder Severity Scale in Korea.韩国惊恐障碍严重程度量表自我报告版的信度和效度。
Depress Anxiety. 2009;26(8):E120-3. doi: 10.1002/da.20461.
9
Nonfearful panic disorder in chest-pain patients: status after nine-year follow-up.胸痛患者中的无恐惧惊恐障碍:九年随访后的状况
Psychosomatics. 2008 Sep-Oct;49(5):426-37. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.49.5.426.
10
Psychiatric comorbidity in patients with chest pain without a cardiac etiology.无心脏病因的胸痛患者的精神疾病共病情况。
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2008;45(1):49-54.